Web based scoring is useful for validation and harmonisation of scoring criteria within RENEB

  • Horst Romm
  • Elizabeth A Ainsbury
  • Joan Francesc Barquinero
  • Leonardo Barrios
  • Christina Beinke
  • Alexandra Cucu
  • Mercedes Moreno Domene
  • Silvia Filippi
  • Octávia Monteiro Gil
  • Eric Gregoire
  • Valeria Hadjidekova
  • Vasia Hatzi
  • Carita Lindholm
  • Radhia M Kacher
  • Alegria Montoro
  • Jayne Moquet
  • Mihaela Noditi
  • Ursula Oestreicher
  • Fabrizio Palitti
  • Gabriel Pantelias
  • María Jesús Prieto
  • Irina Popescu
  • Kai Rothkamm
  • Natividad Sebastià
  • Sylwester Sommer
  • Georgia Terzoudi
  • Antonella Testa
  • Andrzej Wojcik

Abstract

PURPOSE: To establish a training data set of digital images and to investigate the scoring criteria and dose assessment of the dicentric assay within the European network of biodosimetry (RENEB), a web based scoring inter-comparison was undertaken by 17 RENEB partners.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two sets of 50 high resolution images were uploaded onto the RENEB website. One set included metaphases after a moderate exposure (1.3 Gy) and the other set consisted of metaphases after a high dose exposure (3.5 Gy). The laboratories used their own calibration curves for estimating doses based on observed aberration frequencies.

RESULTS: The dose estimations and 95% confidence limits were compared to the actual doses and the corresponding z-values were satisfactory for the majority; only the dose estimations from two laboratories were too low or too high. The coefficients of variation were 17.6% for the moderate and 11.2% for the high dose. Metaphases with controversial results could be identified for training purposes.

CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the web based scoring of the two galleries by the 17 laboratories produced very good results. Application of web based scoring for the dicentric assay may therefore be a relevant strategy for an operational biodosimetry assistance network.

Bibliographical data

Original languageEnglish
ISSN0955-3002
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 22.08.2016
PubMed 27547893