Evaluating the Global Rating scale's psychometric properties to assess communication skills of undergraduate medical students in video-recorded simulated patient encounters

Standard

Evaluating the Global Rating scale's psychometric properties to assess communication skills of undergraduate medical students in video-recorded simulated patient encounters. / Bußenius, Lisa; Kadmon, Martina; Berberat, Pascal O; Harendza, Sigrid.

In: PATIENT EDUC COUNS, Vol. 105, No. 3, 01.03.2022, p. 750-755.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{8af0291bfe9f4567918708da1be71877,
title = "Evaluating the Global Rating scale's psychometric properties to assess communication skills of undergraduate medical students in video-recorded simulated patient encounters",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the psychometric properties of the Global Rating scale (GR) as an observer-based tool to assess communication skills of undergraduate medical students in video-recorded patient encounters.METHODS: Seventy advanced undergraduate medical students participated in a simulation-based assessment including patient consultations. Simulated patients rated these encounters with the Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) scale. Two independent, blinded raters assessed the videos of the encounters with the GR and another blinded rater with the Clinical Reasoning Indicators Scale (CRI-HT-S). To assess the GR's psychometric properties, we analysed reliability by means of a G-study, interrater reliability by ICC, convergent validity (correlation of GR and CARE), and divergent validity (correlation of GR and CRI-HT-S).RESULTS: We analysed 325 videos of 65 students (56.9% female, mean age 26.1 ± 2.2 years). The G-coefficient was.90. Interrater reliability of the GR was ICC = .95, 95% CI [.91,.97]. CARE and GR correlated moderately (ρ = .47, 95% CI [.25,.65]). GR and CRI-HT-S did not correlate (ρ = .09, 95% CI [-.16,.34]).CONCLUSIONS: With excellent reliability and adequate validity, the quality of the GR as assessment instrument for communication skills could be demonstrated.PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: The GR is a suitable instrument for video-based rating of communication skills.",
author = "Lisa Bu{\ss}enius and Martina Kadmon and Berberat, {Pascal O} and Sigrid Harendza",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.",
year = "2022",
month = mar,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.pec.2021.06.001",
language = "English",
volume = "105",
pages = "750--755",
journal = "PATIENT EDUC COUNS",
issn = "0738-3991",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluating the Global Rating scale's psychometric properties to assess communication skills of undergraduate medical students in video-recorded simulated patient encounters

AU - Bußenius, Lisa

AU - Kadmon, Martina

AU - Berberat, Pascal O

AU - Harendza, Sigrid

N1 - Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

PY - 2022/3/1

Y1 - 2022/3/1

N2 - OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the psychometric properties of the Global Rating scale (GR) as an observer-based tool to assess communication skills of undergraduate medical students in video-recorded patient encounters.METHODS: Seventy advanced undergraduate medical students participated in a simulation-based assessment including patient consultations. Simulated patients rated these encounters with the Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) scale. Two independent, blinded raters assessed the videos of the encounters with the GR and another blinded rater with the Clinical Reasoning Indicators Scale (CRI-HT-S). To assess the GR's psychometric properties, we analysed reliability by means of a G-study, interrater reliability by ICC, convergent validity (correlation of GR and CARE), and divergent validity (correlation of GR and CRI-HT-S).RESULTS: We analysed 325 videos of 65 students (56.9% female, mean age 26.1 ± 2.2 years). The G-coefficient was.90. Interrater reliability of the GR was ICC = .95, 95% CI [.91,.97]. CARE and GR correlated moderately (ρ = .47, 95% CI [.25,.65]). GR and CRI-HT-S did not correlate (ρ = .09, 95% CI [-.16,.34]).CONCLUSIONS: With excellent reliability and adequate validity, the quality of the GR as assessment instrument for communication skills could be demonstrated.PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: The GR is a suitable instrument for video-based rating of communication skills.

AB - OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the psychometric properties of the Global Rating scale (GR) as an observer-based tool to assess communication skills of undergraduate medical students in video-recorded patient encounters.METHODS: Seventy advanced undergraduate medical students participated in a simulation-based assessment including patient consultations. Simulated patients rated these encounters with the Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) scale. Two independent, blinded raters assessed the videos of the encounters with the GR and another blinded rater with the Clinical Reasoning Indicators Scale (CRI-HT-S). To assess the GR's psychometric properties, we analysed reliability by means of a G-study, interrater reliability by ICC, convergent validity (correlation of GR and CARE), and divergent validity (correlation of GR and CRI-HT-S).RESULTS: We analysed 325 videos of 65 students (56.9% female, mean age 26.1 ± 2.2 years). The G-coefficient was.90. Interrater reliability of the GR was ICC = .95, 95% CI [.91,.97]. CARE and GR correlated moderately (ρ = .47, 95% CI [.25,.65]). GR and CRI-HT-S did not correlate (ρ = .09, 95% CI [-.16,.34]).CONCLUSIONS: With excellent reliability and adequate validity, the quality of the GR as assessment instrument for communication skills could be demonstrated.PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: The GR is a suitable instrument for video-based rating of communication skills.

U2 - 10.1016/j.pec.2021.06.001

DO - 10.1016/j.pec.2021.06.001

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 34112546

VL - 105

SP - 750

EP - 755

JO - PATIENT EDUC COUNS

JF - PATIENT EDUC COUNS

SN - 0738-3991

IS - 3

ER -