Erfolgsfaktoren, Herausforderungen und Hemmnisse in der kollaborativen Versorgung depressiv erkrankter älterer Menschen: Ein qualitativ kontrastierender Fallvergleich der Patientenperspektive zur Evaluation der Studie GermanIMPACT (QualIMP)
Related Research units
Abstract
Question: Which patient- and intervention-specific moderators contribute to a successful intervention in the GermanIMPACT-study?
Methods: Problem-centered interviews with 26 patients from the intervention group were carried out. These were structured with a type-forming qualitative content analysis and ex-amined in a qualitative contrasting case comparison, regarding conducive and obstructive factors to the intervention and the symptom development.
Results: The telephone-intervention had a positive influence on the depressive symptoms, especially in individuals with late-onset depression, upbeat sense of activities, supportive contacts and limited comorbidity. In contrast, individuals with severe early onset depression could benefit subjectively in a variety of ways, but their depressive symptoms didn’t change.
Discussion: GermanIMPACT, in its current form as a conceptual low-threshold intervention, is suitable for moderately burdened individuals. Extending interventions could increase their effectiveness and improve the care situation of elderly depressed people.
Bibliographical data
Translated title of the contribution | Facilitators, challenges and barriers in the collaborative care management of late-life depression : a qualitative contrasting case comparison of the patient perspective to evaluate the study GermanIMPACT (QualIMP) |
---|---|
Original language | German |
REQUIRED books only: Number of pages | 261 |
---|---|
Publication status | Published - 20.02.2018 |
Publications
Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journal › SCORING: Journal article › Research › peer-review