Should the standard dimethyl sulfoxide concentration be reduced? Results of a European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation prospective noninterventional study on usage and side effects of dimethyl sulfoxide

Standard

Should the standard dimethyl sulfoxide concentration be reduced? Results of a European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation prospective noninterventional study on usage and side effects of dimethyl sulfoxide. / Morris, Curly; de Wreede, Liesbeth; Scholten, Marijke; Brand, Ronald; van Biezen, Anja; Sureda, Anna; Dickmeiss, Ebbe; Trneny, Marek; Apperley, Jane; Chiusolo, Patrizia; van Imhoff, Gustaaf W; Lenhoff, Stig; Martinelli, Giovanni; Hentrich, Marcus; Pabst, Thomas; Onida, Francesco; Quinn, Michael; Kröger, Nicolaus-Martin; de Witte, Theo; Ruutu, Tapani; Chronic Malignancies and Lymphoma Working Parties of the EBMT.

In: TRANSFUSION, Vol. 54, No. 10, 01.10.2014, p. 2514-22.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Morris, C, de Wreede, L, Scholten, M, Brand, R, van Biezen, A, Sureda, A, Dickmeiss, E, Trneny, M, Apperley, J, Chiusolo, P, van Imhoff, GW, Lenhoff, S, Martinelli, G, Hentrich, M, Pabst, T, Onida, F, Quinn, M, Kröger, N-M, de Witte, T, Ruutu, T & Chronic Malignancies and Lymphoma Working Parties of the EBMT 2014, 'Should the standard dimethyl sulfoxide concentration be reduced? Results of a European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation prospective noninterventional study on usage and side effects of dimethyl sulfoxide', TRANSFUSION, vol. 54, no. 10, pp. 2514-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.12759

APA

Morris, C., de Wreede, L., Scholten, M., Brand, R., van Biezen, A., Sureda, A., Dickmeiss, E., Trneny, M., Apperley, J., Chiusolo, P., van Imhoff, G. W., Lenhoff, S., Martinelli, G., Hentrich, M., Pabst, T., Onida, F., Quinn, M., Kröger, N-M., de Witte, T., ... Chronic Malignancies and Lymphoma Working Parties of the EBMT (2014). Should the standard dimethyl sulfoxide concentration be reduced? Results of a European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation prospective noninterventional study on usage and side effects of dimethyl sulfoxide. TRANSFUSION, 54(10), 2514-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.12759

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{7986a3942197490ea5b4a79a0545315b,
title = "Should the standard dimethyl sulfoxide concentration be reduced? Results of a European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation prospective noninterventional study on usage and side effects of dimethyl sulfoxide",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) is essential for the preservation of liquid nitrogen-frozen stem cells, but is associated with toxicity in the transplant recipient.STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: In this prospective noninterventional study, we describe the use of DMSO in 64 European Blood and Marrow Transplant Group centers undertaking autologous transplantation on patients with myeloma and lymphoma and analyze side effects after return of DMSO-preserved stem cells.RESULTS: While the majority of centers continue to use 10% DMSO, a significant proportion either use lower concentrations, mostly 5 or 7.5%, or wash cells before infusion (some for selected patients only). In contrast, the median dose of DMSO given (20 mL) was much less than the upper limit set by the same institutions (70 mL). In an accompanying statistical analysis of side effects noted after return of DMSO-preserved stem cells, we show that patients in the highest quartile receiving DMSO (mL and mL/kg body weight) had significantly more side effects attributed to DMSO, although this effect was not observed if DMSO was calculated as mL/min. Dividing the myeloma and lymphoma patients each into two equal groups by age we were able to confirm this result in all but young myeloma patients in whom an inversion of the odds ratio was seen, possibly related to the higher dose of melphalan received by young myeloma patients.CONCLUSION: We suggest better standardization of preservation method with reduced DMSO concentration and attention to the dose of DMSO received by patients could help reduce the toxicity and morbidity of the transplant procedure.",
author = "Curly Morris and {de Wreede}, Liesbeth and Marijke Scholten and Ronald Brand and {van Biezen}, Anja and Anna Sureda and Ebbe Dickmeiss and Marek Trneny and Jane Apperley and Patrizia Chiusolo and {van Imhoff}, {Gustaaf W} and Stig Lenhoff and Giovanni Martinelli and Marcus Hentrich and Thomas Pabst and Francesco Onida and Michael Quinn and Nicolaus-Martin Kr{\"o}ger and {de Witte}, Theo and Tapani Ruutu and {Chronic Malignancies and Lymphoma Working Parties of the EBMT}",
note = "{\textcopyright} 2014 AABB.",
year = "2014",
month = oct,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/trf.12759",
language = "English",
volume = "54",
pages = "2514--22",
journal = "TRANSFUSION",
issn = "0041-1132",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "10",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Should the standard dimethyl sulfoxide concentration be reduced? Results of a European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation prospective noninterventional study on usage and side effects of dimethyl sulfoxide

AU - Morris, Curly

AU - de Wreede, Liesbeth

AU - Scholten, Marijke

AU - Brand, Ronald

AU - van Biezen, Anja

AU - Sureda, Anna

AU - Dickmeiss, Ebbe

AU - Trneny, Marek

AU - Apperley, Jane

AU - Chiusolo, Patrizia

AU - van Imhoff, Gustaaf W

AU - Lenhoff, Stig

AU - Martinelli, Giovanni

AU - Hentrich, Marcus

AU - Pabst, Thomas

AU - Onida, Francesco

AU - Quinn, Michael

AU - Kröger, Nicolaus-Martin

AU - de Witte, Theo

AU - Ruutu, Tapani

AU - Chronic Malignancies and Lymphoma Working Parties of the EBMT

N1 - © 2014 AABB.

PY - 2014/10/1

Y1 - 2014/10/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) is essential for the preservation of liquid nitrogen-frozen stem cells, but is associated with toxicity in the transplant recipient.STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: In this prospective noninterventional study, we describe the use of DMSO in 64 European Blood and Marrow Transplant Group centers undertaking autologous transplantation on patients with myeloma and lymphoma and analyze side effects after return of DMSO-preserved stem cells.RESULTS: While the majority of centers continue to use 10% DMSO, a significant proportion either use lower concentrations, mostly 5 or 7.5%, or wash cells before infusion (some for selected patients only). In contrast, the median dose of DMSO given (20 mL) was much less than the upper limit set by the same institutions (70 mL). In an accompanying statistical analysis of side effects noted after return of DMSO-preserved stem cells, we show that patients in the highest quartile receiving DMSO (mL and mL/kg body weight) had significantly more side effects attributed to DMSO, although this effect was not observed if DMSO was calculated as mL/min. Dividing the myeloma and lymphoma patients each into two equal groups by age we were able to confirm this result in all but young myeloma patients in whom an inversion of the odds ratio was seen, possibly related to the higher dose of melphalan received by young myeloma patients.CONCLUSION: We suggest better standardization of preservation method with reduced DMSO concentration and attention to the dose of DMSO received by patients could help reduce the toxicity and morbidity of the transplant procedure.

AB - BACKGROUND: Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) is essential for the preservation of liquid nitrogen-frozen stem cells, but is associated with toxicity in the transplant recipient.STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: In this prospective noninterventional study, we describe the use of DMSO in 64 European Blood and Marrow Transplant Group centers undertaking autologous transplantation on patients with myeloma and lymphoma and analyze side effects after return of DMSO-preserved stem cells.RESULTS: While the majority of centers continue to use 10% DMSO, a significant proportion either use lower concentrations, mostly 5 or 7.5%, or wash cells before infusion (some for selected patients only). In contrast, the median dose of DMSO given (20 mL) was much less than the upper limit set by the same institutions (70 mL). In an accompanying statistical analysis of side effects noted after return of DMSO-preserved stem cells, we show that patients in the highest quartile receiving DMSO (mL and mL/kg body weight) had significantly more side effects attributed to DMSO, although this effect was not observed if DMSO was calculated as mL/min. Dividing the myeloma and lymphoma patients each into two equal groups by age we were able to confirm this result in all but young myeloma patients in whom an inversion of the odds ratio was seen, possibly related to the higher dose of melphalan received by young myeloma patients.CONCLUSION: We suggest better standardization of preservation method with reduced DMSO concentration and attention to the dose of DMSO received by patients could help reduce the toxicity and morbidity of the transplant procedure.

U2 - 10.1111/trf.12759

DO - 10.1111/trf.12759

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 24964911

VL - 54

SP - 2514

EP - 2522

JO - TRANSFUSION

JF - TRANSFUSION

SN - 0041-1132

IS - 10

ER -