Should the standard dimethyl sulfoxide concentration be reduced? Results of a European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation prospective noninterventional study on usage and side effects of dimethyl sulfoxide
Standard
Should the standard dimethyl sulfoxide concentration be reduced? Results of a European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation prospective noninterventional study on usage and side effects of dimethyl sulfoxide. / Morris, Curly; de Wreede, Liesbeth; Scholten, Marijke; Brand, Ronald; van Biezen, Anja; Sureda, Anna; Dickmeiss, Ebbe; Trneny, Marek; Apperley, Jane; Chiusolo, Patrizia; van Imhoff, Gustaaf W; Lenhoff, Stig; Martinelli, Giovanni; Hentrich, Marcus; Pabst, Thomas; Onida, Francesco; Quinn, Michael; Kröger, Nicolaus-Martin; de Witte, Theo; Ruutu, Tapani; Chronic Malignancies and Lymphoma Working Parties of the EBMT.
in: TRANSFUSION, Jahrgang 54, Nr. 10, 01.10.2014, S. 2514-22.Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/Zeitung › SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz › Forschung › Begutachtung
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Should the standard dimethyl sulfoxide concentration be reduced? Results of a European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation prospective noninterventional study on usage and side effects of dimethyl sulfoxide
AU - Morris, Curly
AU - de Wreede, Liesbeth
AU - Scholten, Marijke
AU - Brand, Ronald
AU - van Biezen, Anja
AU - Sureda, Anna
AU - Dickmeiss, Ebbe
AU - Trneny, Marek
AU - Apperley, Jane
AU - Chiusolo, Patrizia
AU - van Imhoff, Gustaaf W
AU - Lenhoff, Stig
AU - Martinelli, Giovanni
AU - Hentrich, Marcus
AU - Pabst, Thomas
AU - Onida, Francesco
AU - Quinn, Michael
AU - Kröger, Nicolaus-Martin
AU - de Witte, Theo
AU - Ruutu, Tapani
AU - Chronic Malignancies and Lymphoma Working Parties of the EBMT
N1 - © 2014 AABB.
PY - 2014/10/1
Y1 - 2014/10/1
N2 - BACKGROUND: Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) is essential for the preservation of liquid nitrogen-frozen stem cells, but is associated with toxicity in the transplant recipient.STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: In this prospective noninterventional study, we describe the use of DMSO in 64 European Blood and Marrow Transplant Group centers undertaking autologous transplantation on patients with myeloma and lymphoma and analyze side effects after return of DMSO-preserved stem cells.RESULTS: While the majority of centers continue to use 10% DMSO, a significant proportion either use lower concentrations, mostly 5 or 7.5%, or wash cells before infusion (some for selected patients only). In contrast, the median dose of DMSO given (20 mL) was much less than the upper limit set by the same institutions (70 mL). In an accompanying statistical analysis of side effects noted after return of DMSO-preserved stem cells, we show that patients in the highest quartile receiving DMSO (mL and mL/kg body weight) had significantly more side effects attributed to DMSO, although this effect was not observed if DMSO was calculated as mL/min. Dividing the myeloma and lymphoma patients each into two equal groups by age we were able to confirm this result in all but young myeloma patients in whom an inversion of the odds ratio was seen, possibly related to the higher dose of melphalan received by young myeloma patients.CONCLUSION: We suggest better standardization of preservation method with reduced DMSO concentration and attention to the dose of DMSO received by patients could help reduce the toxicity and morbidity of the transplant procedure.
AB - BACKGROUND: Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) is essential for the preservation of liquid nitrogen-frozen stem cells, but is associated with toxicity in the transplant recipient.STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: In this prospective noninterventional study, we describe the use of DMSO in 64 European Blood and Marrow Transplant Group centers undertaking autologous transplantation on patients with myeloma and lymphoma and analyze side effects after return of DMSO-preserved stem cells.RESULTS: While the majority of centers continue to use 10% DMSO, a significant proportion either use lower concentrations, mostly 5 or 7.5%, or wash cells before infusion (some for selected patients only). In contrast, the median dose of DMSO given (20 mL) was much less than the upper limit set by the same institutions (70 mL). In an accompanying statistical analysis of side effects noted after return of DMSO-preserved stem cells, we show that patients in the highest quartile receiving DMSO (mL and mL/kg body weight) had significantly more side effects attributed to DMSO, although this effect was not observed if DMSO was calculated as mL/min. Dividing the myeloma and lymphoma patients each into two equal groups by age we were able to confirm this result in all but young myeloma patients in whom an inversion of the odds ratio was seen, possibly related to the higher dose of melphalan received by young myeloma patients.CONCLUSION: We suggest better standardization of preservation method with reduced DMSO concentration and attention to the dose of DMSO received by patients could help reduce the toxicity and morbidity of the transplant procedure.
U2 - 10.1111/trf.12759
DO - 10.1111/trf.12759
M3 - SCORING: Journal article
C2 - 24964911
VL - 54
SP - 2514
EP - 2522
JO - TRANSFUSION
JF - TRANSFUSION
SN - 0041-1132
IS - 10
ER -