„Radikale“ vs. „funktionelle“ Chirurgie der Nasennebenhöhlen – ein Widerspruch?

  • Rainer K Weber
  • Tanja Hildenbrand
  • Thomas Kühnel
  • Thomas K Hoffmann
  • Christian Betz
  • Fabian Sommer

Related Research units

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The terms "functional" and "radical" paranasal sinus surgery were often considered to be different operations which were mutually exclusive. This overview aims to look at the basics of these terms and surgical procedures and to work out the resulting surgical concepts for clinically relevant indications.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: Selective literature analysis using the data base PubMed, corresponding textbooks and resulting secondary literature regarding functional and radical or extended paranasal sinus surgery. Similarly, the current literature regarding clinically relevant indications for sinus surgery were analyzed.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Modern pathophysiological knowledge, anatomically and pathophysiologically substantiated endoscopic surgical procedures and the usage of up to date technical possibilities have resulted in concepts which combine functional and so-called radical or extended surgery of the paranasal sinuses that complement each other and sometimes even overlap. The preoperative diagnosis and definition of underlying diseases are decisive and should be as precise as possible, as the extent and surgical details mainly depend on them: a sole creation of free drainage pathways, an additional creation of anatomical access for subsequent topical treatment or a complete (radical) removal of a pathological process.

Bibliographical data

Translated title of the contribution"Radical" versus "functional" surgery of the paranasal sinuses-A contradiction?
Original languageGerman
ISSN0017-6192
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 02.2024

Comment Deanary

© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.

PubMed 37880356