Prognostic impact of neoadjuvant chemoradiation in cT3 oesophageal cancer - A propensity score matched analysis
Standard
Prognostic impact of neoadjuvant chemoradiation in cT3 oesophageal cancer - A propensity score matched analysis. / Hölscher, Arnulf H; Bollschweiler, Elfriede; Bogoevski, Dean; Schmidt, Henner; Semrau, Robert; Izbicki, Jakob R.
In: EUR J CANCER, Vol. 50, No. 17, 11.2014, p. 2950-7.Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journal › SCORING: Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Prognostic impact of neoadjuvant chemoradiation in cT3 oesophageal cancer - A propensity score matched analysis
AU - Hölscher, Arnulf H
AU - Bollschweiler, Elfriede
AU - Bogoevski, Dean
AU - Schmidt, Henner
AU - Semrau, Robert
AU - Izbicki, Jakob R
N1 - Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
PY - 2014/11
Y1 - 2014/11
N2 - BACKGROUND: The prognostic effect of neoadjuvant treatment in advanced oesophageal cancer is still debated because most studies included undefined T-stages, different radio/chemotherapies or different types of surgery.OBJECTIVES: To analyse the prognostic impact of neoadjuvant chemoradiation in patients with clinical T3 oesophageal cancer and oesophagectomy.METHODS: In a retrospective study 768 patients from two centres with cT3/Nx/M0 oesophageal cancer and transthoracic en-bloc oesophagectomy were selected. Clinical staging was based on endoscopy, endosonography and spiral-CT scan. Propensity score matching using histology, location of tumour, age, gender and ASA-classification identified 648 patients (n=302 adenocarcinoma (AC), n=346 squamous cell carcinoma (SCC)) for the intention-to-treat analysis comparing group-I (n=324) patients with planned oesophagectomy and group-II (n=324) patients with planned neoadjuvant chemoradiation (40Gy, 5-FU, cisplatin) followed by oesophagectomy. The prognosis was analysed by univariate and multivariate analyses.RESULTS: In the intention-to-treat analysis group-I had a 17% and group-II a 28% 5-year survival rate (5-YSR) (p<0.001). After excluding patients without oesophagectomy the 5-YSR of group-II increased to 30%. The results were more favourable for patients with AC (5y-SR of 38%) compared to SCC (22%) (p=0.060). In group-II patients with major response (n=128) had a 41% 5-YSR compared to 20% for those with minor response (n=155, p<0,001). In multivariate analysis neoadjuvant chemoradiation was a favourable independent prognostic factor.CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by oesophagectomy results in 11% higher 5-YSR than surgery alone for patients with cT3/Nx/M0 oesophageal cancer. This effect is due to the substantial prognostic benefit of the major responders.
AB - BACKGROUND: The prognostic effect of neoadjuvant treatment in advanced oesophageal cancer is still debated because most studies included undefined T-stages, different radio/chemotherapies or different types of surgery.OBJECTIVES: To analyse the prognostic impact of neoadjuvant chemoradiation in patients with clinical T3 oesophageal cancer and oesophagectomy.METHODS: In a retrospective study 768 patients from two centres with cT3/Nx/M0 oesophageal cancer and transthoracic en-bloc oesophagectomy were selected. Clinical staging was based on endoscopy, endosonography and spiral-CT scan. Propensity score matching using histology, location of tumour, age, gender and ASA-classification identified 648 patients (n=302 adenocarcinoma (AC), n=346 squamous cell carcinoma (SCC)) for the intention-to-treat analysis comparing group-I (n=324) patients with planned oesophagectomy and group-II (n=324) patients with planned neoadjuvant chemoradiation (40Gy, 5-FU, cisplatin) followed by oesophagectomy. The prognosis was analysed by univariate and multivariate analyses.RESULTS: In the intention-to-treat analysis group-I had a 17% and group-II a 28% 5-year survival rate (5-YSR) (p<0.001). After excluding patients without oesophagectomy the 5-YSR of group-II increased to 30%. The results were more favourable for patients with AC (5y-SR of 38%) compared to SCC (22%) (p=0.060). In group-II patients with major response (n=128) had a 41% 5-YSR compared to 20% for those with minor response (n=155, p<0,001). In multivariate analysis neoadjuvant chemoradiation was a favourable independent prognostic factor.CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by oesophagectomy results in 11% higher 5-YSR than surgery alone for patients with cT3/Nx/M0 oesophageal cancer. This effect is due to the substantial prognostic benefit of the major responders.
KW - Adenocarcinoma
KW - Adult
KW - Aged
KW - Aged, 80 and over
KW - Carcinoma, Squamous Cell
KW - Chemoradiotherapy
KW - Epidemiologic Methods
KW - Esophageal Neoplasms
KW - Esophagectomy
KW - Female
KW - Humans
KW - Male
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Neoadjuvant Therapy
KW - Prognosis
KW - Journal Article
KW - Multicenter Study
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejca.2014.08.020
DO - 10.1016/j.ejca.2014.08.020
M3 - SCORING: Journal article
C2 - 25307749
VL - 50
SP - 2950
EP - 2957
JO - EUR J CANCER
JF - EUR J CANCER
SN - 0959-8049
IS - 17
ER -