Prognostic impact of neoadjuvant chemoradiation in cT3 oesophageal cancer - A propensity score matched analysis

Standard

Prognostic impact of neoadjuvant chemoradiation in cT3 oesophageal cancer - A propensity score matched analysis. / Hölscher, Arnulf H; Bollschweiler, Elfriede; Bogoevski, Dean; Schmidt, Henner; Semrau, Robert; Izbicki, Jakob R.

in: EUR J CANCER, Jahrgang 50, Nr. 17, 11.2014, S. 2950-7.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

Hölscher, AH, Bollschweiler, E, Bogoevski, D, Schmidt, H, Semrau, R & Izbicki, JR 2014, 'Prognostic impact of neoadjuvant chemoradiation in cT3 oesophageal cancer - A propensity score matched analysis', EUR J CANCER, Jg. 50, Nr. 17, S. 2950-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2014.08.020

APA

Hölscher, A. H., Bollschweiler, E., Bogoevski, D., Schmidt, H., Semrau, R., & Izbicki, J. R. (2014). Prognostic impact of neoadjuvant chemoradiation in cT3 oesophageal cancer - A propensity score matched analysis. EUR J CANCER, 50(17), 2950-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2014.08.020

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{8878d3a9b0e84d9592095f5ff29224d2,
title = "Prognostic impact of neoadjuvant chemoradiation in cT3 oesophageal cancer - A propensity score matched analysis",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: The prognostic effect of neoadjuvant treatment in advanced oesophageal cancer is still debated because most studies included undefined T-stages, different radio/chemotherapies or different types of surgery.OBJECTIVES: To analyse the prognostic impact of neoadjuvant chemoradiation in patients with clinical T3 oesophageal cancer and oesophagectomy.METHODS: In a retrospective study 768 patients from two centres with cT3/Nx/M0 oesophageal cancer and transthoracic en-bloc oesophagectomy were selected. Clinical staging was based on endoscopy, endosonography and spiral-CT scan. Propensity score matching using histology, location of tumour, age, gender and ASA-classification identified 648 patients (n=302 adenocarcinoma (AC), n=346 squamous cell carcinoma (SCC)) for the intention-to-treat analysis comparing group-I (n=324) patients with planned oesophagectomy and group-II (n=324) patients with planned neoadjuvant chemoradiation (40Gy, 5-FU, cisplatin) followed by oesophagectomy. The prognosis was analysed by univariate and multivariate analyses.RESULTS: In the intention-to-treat analysis group-I had a 17% and group-II a 28% 5-year survival rate (5-YSR) (p<0.001). After excluding patients without oesophagectomy the 5-YSR of group-II increased to 30%. The results were more favourable for patients with AC (5y-SR of 38%) compared to SCC (22%) (p=0.060). In group-II patients with major response (n=128) had a 41% 5-YSR compared to 20% for those with minor response (n=155, p<0,001). In multivariate analysis neoadjuvant chemoradiation was a favourable independent prognostic factor.CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by oesophagectomy results in 11% higher 5-YSR than surgery alone for patients with cT3/Nx/M0 oesophageal cancer. This effect is due to the substantial prognostic benefit of the major responders.",
keywords = "Adenocarcinoma, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell, Chemoradiotherapy, Epidemiologic Methods, Esophageal Neoplasms, Esophagectomy, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoadjuvant Therapy, Prognosis, Journal Article, Multicenter Study",
author = "H{\"o}lscher, {Arnulf H} and Elfriede Bollschweiler and Dean Bogoevski and Henner Schmidt and Robert Semrau and Izbicki, {Jakob R}",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.",
year = "2014",
month = nov,
doi = "10.1016/j.ejca.2014.08.020",
language = "English",
volume = "50",
pages = "2950--7",
journal = "EUR J CANCER",
issn = "0959-8049",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "17",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prognostic impact of neoadjuvant chemoradiation in cT3 oesophageal cancer - A propensity score matched analysis

AU - Hölscher, Arnulf H

AU - Bollschweiler, Elfriede

AU - Bogoevski, Dean

AU - Schmidt, Henner

AU - Semrau, Robert

AU - Izbicki, Jakob R

N1 - Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

PY - 2014/11

Y1 - 2014/11

N2 - BACKGROUND: The prognostic effect of neoadjuvant treatment in advanced oesophageal cancer is still debated because most studies included undefined T-stages, different radio/chemotherapies or different types of surgery.OBJECTIVES: To analyse the prognostic impact of neoadjuvant chemoradiation in patients with clinical T3 oesophageal cancer and oesophagectomy.METHODS: In a retrospective study 768 patients from two centres with cT3/Nx/M0 oesophageal cancer and transthoracic en-bloc oesophagectomy were selected. Clinical staging was based on endoscopy, endosonography and spiral-CT scan. Propensity score matching using histology, location of tumour, age, gender and ASA-classification identified 648 patients (n=302 adenocarcinoma (AC), n=346 squamous cell carcinoma (SCC)) for the intention-to-treat analysis comparing group-I (n=324) patients with planned oesophagectomy and group-II (n=324) patients with planned neoadjuvant chemoradiation (40Gy, 5-FU, cisplatin) followed by oesophagectomy. The prognosis was analysed by univariate and multivariate analyses.RESULTS: In the intention-to-treat analysis group-I had a 17% and group-II a 28% 5-year survival rate (5-YSR) (p<0.001). After excluding patients without oesophagectomy the 5-YSR of group-II increased to 30%. The results were more favourable for patients with AC (5y-SR of 38%) compared to SCC (22%) (p=0.060). In group-II patients with major response (n=128) had a 41% 5-YSR compared to 20% for those with minor response (n=155, p<0,001). In multivariate analysis neoadjuvant chemoradiation was a favourable independent prognostic factor.CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by oesophagectomy results in 11% higher 5-YSR than surgery alone for patients with cT3/Nx/M0 oesophageal cancer. This effect is due to the substantial prognostic benefit of the major responders.

AB - BACKGROUND: The prognostic effect of neoadjuvant treatment in advanced oesophageal cancer is still debated because most studies included undefined T-stages, different radio/chemotherapies or different types of surgery.OBJECTIVES: To analyse the prognostic impact of neoadjuvant chemoradiation in patients with clinical T3 oesophageal cancer and oesophagectomy.METHODS: In a retrospective study 768 patients from two centres with cT3/Nx/M0 oesophageal cancer and transthoracic en-bloc oesophagectomy were selected. Clinical staging was based on endoscopy, endosonography and spiral-CT scan. Propensity score matching using histology, location of tumour, age, gender and ASA-classification identified 648 patients (n=302 adenocarcinoma (AC), n=346 squamous cell carcinoma (SCC)) for the intention-to-treat analysis comparing group-I (n=324) patients with planned oesophagectomy and group-II (n=324) patients with planned neoadjuvant chemoradiation (40Gy, 5-FU, cisplatin) followed by oesophagectomy. The prognosis was analysed by univariate and multivariate analyses.RESULTS: In the intention-to-treat analysis group-I had a 17% and group-II a 28% 5-year survival rate (5-YSR) (p<0.001). After excluding patients without oesophagectomy the 5-YSR of group-II increased to 30%. The results were more favourable for patients with AC (5y-SR of 38%) compared to SCC (22%) (p=0.060). In group-II patients with major response (n=128) had a 41% 5-YSR compared to 20% for those with minor response (n=155, p<0,001). In multivariate analysis neoadjuvant chemoradiation was a favourable independent prognostic factor.CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by oesophagectomy results in 11% higher 5-YSR than surgery alone for patients with cT3/Nx/M0 oesophageal cancer. This effect is due to the substantial prognostic benefit of the major responders.

KW - Adenocarcinoma

KW - Adult

KW - Aged

KW - Aged, 80 and over

KW - Carcinoma, Squamous Cell

KW - Chemoradiotherapy

KW - Epidemiologic Methods

KW - Esophageal Neoplasms

KW - Esophagectomy

KW - Female

KW - Humans

KW - Male

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Neoadjuvant Therapy

KW - Prognosis

KW - Journal Article

KW - Multicenter Study

U2 - 10.1016/j.ejca.2014.08.020

DO - 10.1016/j.ejca.2014.08.020

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 25307749

VL - 50

SP - 2950

EP - 2957

JO - EUR J CANCER

JF - EUR J CANCER

SN - 0959-8049

IS - 17

ER -