Overestimation of Postpartum Depression Prevalence Based on a 5-item Version of the EPDS: Systematic Review and Individual Participant Data Meta-analysis

  • Brett D Thombs
  • Brooke Levis
  • Anita Lyubenova
  • Dipika Neupane
  • Zelalem Negeri
  • Yin Wu
  • Ying Sun
  • Chen He
  • Ankur Krishnan
  • Simone N Vigod
  • Parash Mani Bhandari
  • Mahrukh Imran
  • Danielle B Rice
  • Marleine Azar
  • Matthew J Chiovitti
  • Nazanin Saadat
  • Kira E Riehm
  • Jill T Boruff
  • Pim Cuijpers
  • Simon Gilbody
  • John P A Ioannidis
  • Lorie A Kloda
  • Scott B Patten
  • Ian Shrier
  • Roy C Ziegelstein
  • Liane Comeau
  • Nicholas D Mitchell
  • Marcello Tonelli
  • Jacqueline Barnes
  • Cheryl Tatano Beck
  • Carola Bindt
  • Barbara Figueiredo
  • Nadine Helle
  • Louise M Howard
  • Jane Kohlhoff
  • Zoltán Kozinszky
  • Angeliki A Leonardou
  • Sandra Nakić Radoš
  • Chantal Quispel
  • Tamsen J Rochat
  • Alan Stein
  • Robert C Stewart
  • Meri Tadinac
  • S Darius Tandon
  • Iva Tendais
  • Annamária Töreki
  • Thach D Tran
  • Kylee Trevillion
  • Katherine Turner
  • Johann M Vega-Dienstmaier
  • Andrea Benedetti

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The Maternal Mental Health in Canada, 2018/2019, survey reported that 18% of 7,085 mothers who recently gave birth reported "feelings consistent with postpartum depression" based on scores ≥7 on a 5-item version of the Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale (EPDS-5). The EPDS-5 was designed as a screening questionnaire, not to classify disorders or estimate prevalence; the extent to which EPDS-5 results reflect depression prevalence is unknown. We investigated EPDS-5 ≥7 performance relative to major depression prevalence based on a validated diagnostic interview, the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM (SCID).

METHODS: We searched Medline, Medline In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, PsycINFO, and the Web of Science Core Collection through June 2016 for studies with data sets with item response data to calculate EPDS-5 scores and that used the SCID to ascertain depression status. We conducted an individual participant data meta-analysis to estimate pooled percentage of EPDS-5 ≥7, pooled SCID major depression prevalence, and the pooled difference in prevalence.

RESULTS: A total of 3,958 participants from 19 primary studies were included. Pooled prevalence of SCID major depression was 9.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.0% to 13.7%), pooled percentage of participants with EPDS-5 ≥7 was 16.2% (95% CI 10.7% to 23.8%), and pooled difference was 8.0% (95% CI 2.9% to 13.2%). In the 19 included studies, mean and median ratios of EPDS-5 to SCID prevalence were 2.1 and 1.4 times.

CONCLUSIONS: Prevalence estimated based on EPDS-5 ≥7 appears to be substantially higher than the prevalence of major depression. Validated diagnostic interviews should be used to establish prevalence.

Bibliographical data

Original languageEnglish
ISSN0706-7437
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 12.2020
PubMed 33104415