Myoepitheliale Tumoren der Kopfspeicheldrüsen
Standard
Myoepitheliale Tumoren der Kopfspeicheldrüsen : Myoepithelial tumors of salivary glands. / Hungermann, D; Roeser, K; Buerger, H; Jäkel, T; Löning, T; Herbst, H.
In: PATHOLOGE, Vol. 26, No. 5, 09.2005, p. 339-44.Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journal › SCORING: Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Myoepitheliale Tumoren der Kopfspeicheldrüsen
T2 - Myoepithelial tumors of salivary glands
AU - Hungermann, D
AU - Roeser, K
AU - Buerger, H
AU - Jäkel, T
AU - Löning, T
AU - Herbst, H
PY - 2005/9
Y1 - 2005/9
N2 - This tutorial focuses on myoepithelial tumors of salivary glands, an entity with heterogeneous cytomorphology and inconsistent immunophenotype. Moreover, the clinical course cannot be predicted reliably from cytomorphological and immunophenotypic analysis. This heterogeneity causes problems in routine diagnostic, so that diagnosis ultimately rests on conventional histology. In a representative series of myoepitheliomas and malignant myoepitheliomas, antibodies against cytokeratins 5/6, S 100 protein and vimentin produced the most consistent reactivity profile. Staining for cytokeratins 5/6 is a useful addition to the established immunohistologic marker panel in the work-up of myoepitheliomas, because of its reliable expression in most cases and because it may underline the epithelial nature of the lesion. Comparative genomic hybridisation (CGH) profiles of myoepitheliomas and myoepithelial carcinomas showed no chromosomal aberration in less than 50% of myoepithelial carcinomas, so that CGH is of limited help in a given case. In a case that was represented in three separately localized manifestations of the disease that differed in their CGH profiles, gross genetic aberrations suggest to be acquired during tumor progression and should raise the suspicion of malignancy. Thus, diagnosis of myoepithelial tumors of salivary glands has to rest on morphological grounds with support of a restricted panel of immunohistologic markers.
AB - This tutorial focuses on myoepithelial tumors of salivary glands, an entity with heterogeneous cytomorphology and inconsistent immunophenotype. Moreover, the clinical course cannot be predicted reliably from cytomorphological and immunophenotypic analysis. This heterogeneity causes problems in routine diagnostic, so that diagnosis ultimately rests on conventional histology. In a representative series of myoepitheliomas and malignant myoepitheliomas, antibodies against cytokeratins 5/6, S 100 protein and vimentin produced the most consistent reactivity profile. Staining for cytokeratins 5/6 is a useful addition to the established immunohistologic marker panel in the work-up of myoepitheliomas, because of its reliable expression in most cases and because it may underline the epithelial nature of the lesion. Comparative genomic hybridisation (CGH) profiles of myoepitheliomas and myoepithelial carcinomas showed no chromosomal aberration in less than 50% of myoepithelial carcinomas, so that CGH is of limited help in a given case. In a case that was represented in three separately localized manifestations of the disease that differed in their CGH profiles, gross genetic aberrations suggest to be acquired during tumor progression and should raise the suspicion of malignancy. Thus, diagnosis of myoepithelial tumors of salivary glands has to rest on morphological grounds with support of a restricted panel of immunohistologic markers.
KW - Breast Neoplasms
KW - Carcinoma
KW - Diagnosis, Differential
KW - Female
KW - Humans
KW - Myoepithelioma
KW - Salivary Gland Neoplasms
KW - English Abstract
KW - Journal Article
KW - Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
KW - Review
U2 - 10.1007/s00292-005-0774-1
DO - 10.1007/s00292-005-0774-1
M3 - SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz
C2 - 16025256
VL - 26
SP - 339
EP - 344
JO - PATHOLOGE
JF - PATHOLOGE
SN - 0172-8113
IS - 5
ER -