Myoepitheliale Tumoren der Kopfspeicheldrüsen

Standard

Myoepitheliale Tumoren der Kopfspeicheldrüsen : Myoepithelial tumors of salivary glands. / Hungermann, D; Roeser, K; Buerger, H; Jäkel, T; Löning, T; Herbst, H.

in: PATHOLOGE, Jahrgang 26, Nr. 5, 09.2005, S. 339-44.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

Hungermann, D, Roeser, K, Buerger, H, Jäkel, T, Löning, T & Herbst, H 2005, 'Myoepitheliale Tumoren der Kopfspeicheldrüsen: Myoepithelial tumors of salivary glands', PATHOLOGE, Jg. 26, Nr. 5, S. 339-44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00292-005-0774-1

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{499902026a5c4070bffb17ac3e391db5,
title = "Myoepitheliale Tumoren der Kopfspeicheldr{\"u}sen: Myoepithelial tumors of salivary glands",
abstract = "This tutorial focuses on myoepithelial tumors of salivary glands, an entity with heterogeneous cytomorphology and inconsistent immunophenotype. Moreover, the clinical course cannot be predicted reliably from cytomorphological and immunophenotypic analysis. This heterogeneity causes problems in routine diagnostic, so that diagnosis ultimately rests on conventional histology. In a representative series of myoepitheliomas and malignant myoepitheliomas, antibodies against cytokeratins 5/6, S 100 protein and vimentin produced the most consistent reactivity profile. Staining for cytokeratins 5/6 is a useful addition to the established immunohistologic marker panel in the work-up of myoepitheliomas, because of its reliable expression in most cases and because it may underline the epithelial nature of the lesion. Comparative genomic hybridisation (CGH) profiles of myoepitheliomas and myoepithelial carcinomas showed no chromosomal aberration in less than 50% of myoepithelial carcinomas, so that CGH is of limited help in a given case. In a case that was represented in three separately localized manifestations of the disease that differed in their CGH profiles, gross genetic aberrations suggest to be acquired during tumor progression and should raise the suspicion of malignancy. Thus, diagnosis of myoepithelial tumors of salivary glands has to rest on morphological grounds with support of a restricted panel of immunohistologic markers.",
keywords = "Breast Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Diagnosis, Differential, Female, Humans, Myoepithelioma, Salivary Gland Neoplasms, English Abstract, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't, Review",
author = "D Hungermann and K Roeser and H Buerger and T J{\"a}kel and T L{\"o}ning and H Herbst",
year = "2005",
month = sep,
doi = "10.1007/s00292-005-0774-1",
language = "Deutsch",
volume = "26",
pages = "339--44",
journal = "PATHOLOGE",
issn = "0172-8113",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Myoepitheliale Tumoren der Kopfspeicheldrüsen

T2 - Myoepithelial tumors of salivary glands

AU - Hungermann, D

AU - Roeser, K

AU - Buerger, H

AU - Jäkel, T

AU - Löning, T

AU - Herbst, H

PY - 2005/9

Y1 - 2005/9

N2 - This tutorial focuses on myoepithelial tumors of salivary glands, an entity with heterogeneous cytomorphology and inconsistent immunophenotype. Moreover, the clinical course cannot be predicted reliably from cytomorphological and immunophenotypic analysis. This heterogeneity causes problems in routine diagnostic, so that diagnosis ultimately rests on conventional histology. In a representative series of myoepitheliomas and malignant myoepitheliomas, antibodies against cytokeratins 5/6, S 100 protein and vimentin produced the most consistent reactivity profile. Staining for cytokeratins 5/6 is a useful addition to the established immunohistologic marker panel in the work-up of myoepitheliomas, because of its reliable expression in most cases and because it may underline the epithelial nature of the lesion. Comparative genomic hybridisation (CGH) profiles of myoepitheliomas and myoepithelial carcinomas showed no chromosomal aberration in less than 50% of myoepithelial carcinomas, so that CGH is of limited help in a given case. In a case that was represented in three separately localized manifestations of the disease that differed in their CGH profiles, gross genetic aberrations suggest to be acquired during tumor progression and should raise the suspicion of malignancy. Thus, diagnosis of myoepithelial tumors of salivary glands has to rest on morphological grounds with support of a restricted panel of immunohistologic markers.

AB - This tutorial focuses on myoepithelial tumors of salivary glands, an entity with heterogeneous cytomorphology and inconsistent immunophenotype. Moreover, the clinical course cannot be predicted reliably from cytomorphological and immunophenotypic analysis. This heterogeneity causes problems in routine diagnostic, so that diagnosis ultimately rests on conventional histology. In a representative series of myoepitheliomas and malignant myoepitheliomas, antibodies against cytokeratins 5/6, S 100 protein and vimentin produced the most consistent reactivity profile. Staining for cytokeratins 5/6 is a useful addition to the established immunohistologic marker panel in the work-up of myoepitheliomas, because of its reliable expression in most cases and because it may underline the epithelial nature of the lesion. Comparative genomic hybridisation (CGH) profiles of myoepitheliomas and myoepithelial carcinomas showed no chromosomal aberration in less than 50% of myoepithelial carcinomas, so that CGH is of limited help in a given case. In a case that was represented in three separately localized manifestations of the disease that differed in their CGH profiles, gross genetic aberrations suggest to be acquired during tumor progression and should raise the suspicion of malignancy. Thus, diagnosis of myoepithelial tumors of salivary glands has to rest on morphological grounds with support of a restricted panel of immunohistologic markers.

KW - Breast Neoplasms

KW - Carcinoma

KW - Diagnosis, Differential

KW - Female

KW - Humans

KW - Myoepithelioma

KW - Salivary Gland Neoplasms

KW - English Abstract

KW - Journal Article

KW - Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

KW - Review

U2 - 10.1007/s00292-005-0774-1

DO - 10.1007/s00292-005-0774-1

M3 - SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz

C2 - 16025256

VL - 26

SP - 339

EP - 344

JO - PATHOLOGE

JF - PATHOLOGE

SN - 0172-8113

IS - 5

ER -