Metacognitive Training for Depression: Feasibility, safety and acceptability of two new treatment modules to reduce suicidality

Standard

Metacognitive Training for Depression: Feasibility, safety and acceptability of two new treatment modules to reduce suicidality. / Jelinek, Lena; Peth, Judith; Runde, Anne; Arlt, Sönke; Scheunemann, Jakob; Gallinat, Jürgen.

In: CLIN PSYCHOL PSYCHOT, Vol. 28, No. 3, 05.2021, p. 669-681.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{ea5dbab845104f6f9577071ea7d3eb3c,
title = "Metacognitive Training for Depression: Feasibility, safety and acceptability of two new treatment modules to reduce suicidality",
abstract = "Recent evidence favours psychological interventions explicitly targeting suicidality; however, group treatments on suicidality are rare and are assumed to have unfavourable effects. We developed two modules specifically addressing suicidality that replace two existing modules in the Metacognitive Training for Depression (D-MCT). The aim of the current study was to examine the feasibility, safety, and acceptability of this intervention (D-MCT/S). Forty-eight inpatients with depression received eight sessions of D-MCT/S over 4 weeks in addition to standard treatment. Patients were assessed before the training, 4 and 8 weeks later regarding suicidality (primary outcome: Beck Suicide Scale [BSS]), hopelessness, depression (e.g. Hamilton Depression Rating Scale [HDRS]), dysfunctional attitudes, and self-esteem. Negative effects of the modules and subjective appraisal were assessed. Suicidality, hopelessness, and depression decreased over time. Whereas the effects on the BSS only reached trend level, a large effect was observed when the suicide item of the HDRS was used. Two of the 46 patients (4%) reported a deterioration in their symptoms, but this was not associated with the D-MCT/S. Negative effects of the general training were rather low, and acceptability was high. In general, patients evaluated the two new modules on suicidality similarly to the established modules. However, both modules were assessed as distressing by 39% of the patients. When we addressed suicidality in the D-MCT/S, we did not observe any contagious effects. In fact, the pilot versions of the two modules on suicidality are promising in terms of feasibility, safety, and acceptability. The results will be used to improve current shortcomings. The trial was registered with the German Clinical Trials Register (#DRKS-ID: DRKS00010543) on 23 August 2016.",
author = "Lena Jelinek and Judith Peth and Anne Runde and S{\"o}nke Arlt and Jakob Scheunemann and J{\"u}rgen Gallinat",
note = "{\textcopyright} 2020 The Authors. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.",
year = "2021",
month = may,
doi = "10.1002/cpp.2529",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "669--681",
journal = "CLIN PSYCHOL PSYCHOT",
issn = "1063-3995",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Metacognitive Training for Depression: Feasibility, safety and acceptability of two new treatment modules to reduce suicidality

AU - Jelinek, Lena

AU - Peth, Judith

AU - Runde, Anne

AU - Arlt, Sönke

AU - Scheunemann, Jakob

AU - Gallinat, Jürgen

N1 - © 2020 The Authors. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

PY - 2021/5

Y1 - 2021/5

N2 - Recent evidence favours psychological interventions explicitly targeting suicidality; however, group treatments on suicidality are rare and are assumed to have unfavourable effects. We developed two modules specifically addressing suicidality that replace two existing modules in the Metacognitive Training for Depression (D-MCT). The aim of the current study was to examine the feasibility, safety, and acceptability of this intervention (D-MCT/S). Forty-eight inpatients with depression received eight sessions of D-MCT/S over 4 weeks in addition to standard treatment. Patients were assessed before the training, 4 and 8 weeks later regarding suicidality (primary outcome: Beck Suicide Scale [BSS]), hopelessness, depression (e.g. Hamilton Depression Rating Scale [HDRS]), dysfunctional attitudes, and self-esteem. Negative effects of the modules and subjective appraisal were assessed. Suicidality, hopelessness, and depression decreased over time. Whereas the effects on the BSS only reached trend level, a large effect was observed when the suicide item of the HDRS was used. Two of the 46 patients (4%) reported a deterioration in their symptoms, but this was not associated with the D-MCT/S. Negative effects of the general training were rather low, and acceptability was high. In general, patients evaluated the two new modules on suicidality similarly to the established modules. However, both modules were assessed as distressing by 39% of the patients. When we addressed suicidality in the D-MCT/S, we did not observe any contagious effects. In fact, the pilot versions of the two modules on suicidality are promising in terms of feasibility, safety, and acceptability. The results will be used to improve current shortcomings. The trial was registered with the German Clinical Trials Register (#DRKS-ID: DRKS00010543) on 23 August 2016.

AB - Recent evidence favours psychological interventions explicitly targeting suicidality; however, group treatments on suicidality are rare and are assumed to have unfavourable effects. We developed two modules specifically addressing suicidality that replace two existing modules in the Metacognitive Training for Depression (D-MCT). The aim of the current study was to examine the feasibility, safety, and acceptability of this intervention (D-MCT/S). Forty-eight inpatients with depression received eight sessions of D-MCT/S over 4 weeks in addition to standard treatment. Patients were assessed before the training, 4 and 8 weeks later regarding suicidality (primary outcome: Beck Suicide Scale [BSS]), hopelessness, depression (e.g. Hamilton Depression Rating Scale [HDRS]), dysfunctional attitudes, and self-esteem. Negative effects of the modules and subjective appraisal were assessed. Suicidality, hopelessness, and depression decreased over time. Whereas the effects on the BSS only reached trend level, a large effect was observed when the suicide item of the HDRS was used. Two of the 46 patients (4%) reported a deterioration in their symptoms, but this was not associated with the D-MCT/S. Negative effects of the general training were rather low, and acceptability was high. In general, patients evaluated the two new modules on suicidality similarly to the established modules. However, both modules were assessed as distressing by 39% of the patients. When we addressed suicidality in the D-MCT/S, we did not observe any contagious effects. In fact, the pilot versions of the two modules on suicidality are promising in terms of feasibility, safety, and acceptability. The results will be used to improve current shortcomings. The trial was registered with the German Clinical Trials Register (#DRKS-ID: DRKS00010543) on 23 August 2016.

U2 - 10.1002/cpp.2529

DO - 10.1002/cpp.2529

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 33169467

VL - 28

SP - 669

EP - 681

JO - CLIN PSYCHOL PSYCHOT

JF - CLIN PSYCHOL PSYCHOT

SN - 1063-3995

IS - 3

ER -