Research ExplorerPublicationsMedizinrechtliche Aspekte von Tumorboards

Medizinrechtliche Aspekte von Tumorboards

Standard

Medizinrechtliche Aspekte von Tumorboards. / Haier, J; Bergmann, K O.

In: CHIRURG, Vol. 84, No. 3, 03.2013, p. 225-30.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journal › SCORING: Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Haier, J & Bergmann, KO 2013, 'Medizinrechtliche Aspekte von Tumorboards', CHIRURG, vol. 84, no. 3, pp. 225-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-013-2481-4

APA

Haier, J., & Bergmann, K. O. (2013). Medizinrechtliche Aspekte von Tumorboards. CHIRURG, 84(3), 225-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-013-2481-4

Vancouver

Haier J, Bergmann KO. Medizinrechtliche Aspekte von Tumorboards. CHIRURG. 2013 Mar;84(3):225-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-013-2481-4

Bibtex

@article{4db94ece92e148d0b7176c3d28aba2e5,
title = "Medizinrechtliche Aspekte von Tumorboards",
abstract = "The presentation of tumor patients to tumor boards has widely developed into a medical standard. The necessary compliance to the medical standard can lead to obligatory presentation if the complexity of a case dictates that this cannot be comprehensively covered by a single treating physician. The organization of a tumor board must be so that the structure and specialist competence guarantees an adequate consultative function of the represented specialties. Tumor board members are not automatically promoted to become part of the treating team just by participation and therefore do not have a guarantor position but do have the obligation of care of a consulting physician. Tumor board decisions have a recommendation character, are not binding in the legal sense and do not relieve the treating physician from the obligation to critically scrutinize the recommendations before implementation. On the other hand the treating physician must be able to justify not following the recommendations on the basis of the medical obligation to care. The tumor board must fulfil the same requirements for documentation as any other consultative activity.",
keywords = "Clinical Competence, Cooperative Behavior, Documentation, Expert Testimony, Germany, Humans, Interdisciplinary Communication, Malpractice, National Health Programs, Neoplasms, Oncology Service, Hospital, Patient Care Team, Professional Staff Committees, Referral and Consultation",
author = "J Haier and Bergmann, {K O}",
year = "2013",
month = mar,
doi = "10.1007/s00104-013-2481-4",
language = "Deutsch",
volume = "84",
pages = "225--30",
journal = "CHIRURG",
issn = "0009-4722",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Medizinrechtliche Aspekte von Tumorboards

AU - Haier, J

AU - Bergmann, K O

PY - 2013/3

Y1 - 2013/3

N2 - The presentation of tumor patients to tumor boards has widely developed into a medical standard. The necessary compliance to the medical standard can lead to obligatory presentation if the complexity of a case dictates that this cannot be comprehensively covered by a single treating physician. The organization of a tumor board must be so that the structure and specialist competence guarantees an adequate consultative function of the represented specialties. Tumor board members are not automatically promoted to become part of the treating team just by participation and therefore do not have a guarantor position but do have the obligation of care of a consulting physician. Tumor board decisions have a recommendation character, are not binding in the legal sense and do not relieve the treating physician from the obligation to critically scrutinize the recommendations before implementation. On the other hand the treating physician must be able to justify not following the recommendations on the basis of the medical obligation to care. The tumor board must fulfil the same requirements for documentation as any other consultative activity.

AB - The presentation of tumor patients to tumor boards has widely developed into a medical standard. The necessary compliance to the medical standard can lead to obligatory presentation if the complexity of a case dictates that this cannot be comprehensively covered by a single treating physician. The organization of a tumor board must be so that the structure and specialist competence guarantees an adequate consultative function of the represented specialties. Tumor board members are not automatically promoted to become part of the treating team just by participation and therefore do not have a guarantor position but do have the obligation of care of a consulting physician. Tumor board decisions have a recommendation character, are not binding in the legal sense and do not relieve the treating physician from the obligation to critically scrutinize the recommendations before implementation. On the other hand the treating physician must be able to justify not following the recommendations on the basis of the medical obligation to care. The tumor board must fulfil the same requirements for documentation as any other consultative activity.

KW - Clinical Competence

KW - Cooperative Behavior

KW - Documentation

KW - Expert Testimony

KW - Germany

KW - Humans

KW - Interdisciplinary Communication

KW - Malpractice

KW - National Health Programs

KW - Neoplasms

KW - Oncology Service, Hospital

KW - Patient Care Team

KW - Professional Staff Committees

KW - Referral and Consultation

U2 - 10.1007/s00104-013-2481-4

DO - 10.1007/s00104-013-2481-4

M3 - SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz

C2 - 23455588

VL - 84

SP - 225

EP - 230

JO - CHIRURG

JF - CHIRURG

SN - 0009-4722

IS - 3

ER -