Medizinrechtliche Aspekte von Tumorboards
Standard
Medizinrechtliche Aspekte von Tumorboards. / Haier, J; Bergmann, K O.
in: CHIRURG, Jahrgang 84, Nr. 3, 03.2013, S. 225-30.Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/Zeitung › SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz › Forschung › Begutachtung
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Medizinrechtliche Aspekte von Tumorboards
AU - Haier, J
AU - Bergmann, K O
PY - 2013/3
Y1 - 2013/3
N2 - The presentation of tumor patients to tumor boards has widely developed into a medical standard. The necessary compliance to the medical standard can lead to obligatory presentation if the complexity of a case dictates that this cannot be comprehensively covered by a single treating physician. The organization of a tumor board must be so that the structure and specialist competence guarantees an adequate consultative function of the represented specialties. Tumor board members are not automatically promoted to become part of the treating team just by participation and therefore do not have a guarantor position but do have the obligation of care of a consulting physician. Tumor board decisions have a recommendation character, are not binding in the legal sense and do not relieve the treating physician from the obligation to critically scrutinize the recommendations before implementation. On the other hand the treating physician must be able to justify not following the recommendations on the basis of the medical obligation to care. The tumor board must fulfil the same requirements for documentation as any other consultative activity.
AB - The presentation of tumor patients to tumor boards has widely developed into a medical standard. The necessary compliance to the medical standard can lead to obligatory presentation if the complexity of a case dictates that this cannot be comprehensively covered by a single treating physician. The organization of a tumor board must be so that the structure and specialist competence guarantees an adequate consultative function of the represented specialties. Tumor board members are not automatically promoted to become part of the treating team just by participation and therefore do not have a guarantor position but do have the obligation of care of a consulting physician. Tumor board decisions have a recommendation character, are not binding in the legal sense and do not relieve the treating physician from the obligation to critically scrutinize the recommendations before implementation. On the other hand the treating physician must be able to justify not following the recommendations on the basis of the medical obligation to care. The tumor board must fulfil the same requirements for documentation as any other consultative activity.
KW - Clinical Competence
KW - Cooperative Behavior
KW - Documentation
KW - Expert Testimony
KW - Germany
KW - Humans
KW - Interdisciplinary Communication
KW - Malpractice
KW - National Health Programs
KW - Neoplasms
KW - Oncology Service, Hospital
KW - Patient Care Team
KW - Professional Staff Committees
KW - Referral and Consultation
U2 - 10.1007/s00104-013-2481-4
DO - 10.1007/s00104-013-2481-4
M3 - SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz
C2 - 23455588
VL - 84
SP - 225
EP - 230
JO - CHIRURG
JF - CHIRURG
SN - 0009-4722
IS - 3
ER -