Longitudinal Doppler Assessments in Late Preterm Fetal Growth Restriction

  • Bronacha Mylrea-Foley
  • Hans Wolf
  • Tamara Stampalija
  • Christoph Lees
  • B Arabin
  • A Berger
  • E Bergman
  • A Bhide
  • C M Bilardo
  • A C Breeze
  • J Brodszki
  • P Calda
  • I Cetin
  • E Cesari
  • J Derks
  • C Ebbing
  • E Ferrazzi
  • W Ganzevoort
  • T Frusca
  • S J Gordijn
  • W Gyselaers
  • K Hecher
  • P Klaritsch
  • L Krofta
  • P Lindgren
  • S M Lobmaier
  • N Marlow
  • G M Maruotti
  • F Mecacci
  • K Myklestad
  • R Napolitano
  • F Prefumo
  • L Raio
  • J Richter
  • R K Sande
  • J Thornton
  • H Valensise
  • G H A Visser
  • L Wee
  • Truffle-2 Group

Abstract

PURPOSE:  To assess the longitudinal variation of the ratio of umbilical and cerebral artery pulsatility index (UCR) in late preterm fetal growth restriction (FGR).

MATERIALS AND METHODS:  A prospective European multicenter observational study included women with a singleton pregnancy, 32+ 0-36+ 6, at risk of FGR (estimated fetal weight [EFW] or abdominal circumference [AC] < 10th percentile, abnormal arterial Doppler or fall in AC from 20-week scan of > 40 percentile points). The primary outcome was a composite of abnormal condition at birth or major neonatal morbidity. UCR was categorized as normal (< 0.9) or abnormal (≥ 0.9). UCR was assessed by gestational age at measurement interval to delivery, and by individual linear regression coefficient in women with two or more measurements.

RESULTS:  856 women had 2770 measurements; 696 (81 %) had more than one measurement (median 3 (IQR 2-4). At inclusion, 63 (7 %) a UCR ≥ 0.9. These delivered earlier and had a lower birth weight and higher incidence of adverse outcome (30 % vs. 9 %, relative risk 3.2; 95 %CI 2.1-5.0) than women with a normal UCR at inclusion. Repeated measurements after an abnormal UCR at inclusion were abnormal again in 67 % (95 %CI 55-80), but after a normal UCR the chance of finding an abnormal UCR was 6 % (95 %CI 5-7 %). The risk of composite adverse outcome was similar using the first or subsequent UCR values.

CONCLUSION:  An abnormal UCR is likely to be abnormal again at a later measurement, while after a normal UCR the chance of an abnormal UCR is 5-7 % when repeated weekly. Repeated measurements do not predict outcome better than the first measurement, most likely due to the most compromised fetuses being delivered after an abnormal UCR.

Bibliographical data

Translated title of the contributionLongitudinale Doppler-Bewertungen bei später fetaler Wachstumsrestriktion
Original languageEnglish
ISSN0172-4614
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 02.2023

Comment Deanary

Thieme. All rights reserved.

PubMed 34768305