Improvement of ureteroileal anastomosis in continent urinary diversion with modified Le Duc procedure.
Standard
Improvement of ureteroileal anastomosis in continent urinary diversion with modified Le Duc procedure. / Schwaibold, H; Friedrich, Martin; Fernandez, S; Conrad, S; Huland, H.
In: J UROLOGY, Vol. 160(3 Pt 1), 1998, p. 718-720.Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journal › SCORING: Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Improvement of ureteroileal anastomosis in continent urinary diversion with modified Le Duc procedure.
AU - Schwaibold, H
AU - Friedrich, Martin
AU - Fernandez, S
AU - Conrad, S
AU - Huland, H
PY - 1998
Y1 - 1998
N2 - PURPOSE: Ureteroileal stricture after urinary diversion often has deleterious effects on the upper ureteral tract. A common ureteral implantation technique described by Le Duc et al has recently been criticized for a high rate of ureteral stricture. We assessed the rate of upper urinary tract dilatation and deterioration in 60 consecutive patients who underwent continent urinary diversion and ureteroileal anastomosis with a modified Le Duc procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 60 patients underwent continent urinary diversion with an ileal neobladder (Hautmann). Ureteroileal implantation was performed using a modified Le Duc technique. Followup was performed prospectively for a median of 32 months. The clinical end point was postoperative development of upper urinary tract dilatation, or an increase in preoperative dilatation confirmed by excretory urography or furosemide isotope nephrography. RESULTS: Nonneoplastic deterioration of the upper urinary tract was noted in 4 of 117 renoureteral units (3.4%). No permanent decrease in renal function or increase in pyelonephritic episodes was noted. CONCLUSIONS: The modified Le Duc technique is simple and safe for ureteroileal anastomosis and has a low complication rate.
AB - PURPOSE: Ureteroileal stricture after urinary diversion often has deleterious effects on the upper ureteral tract. A common ureteral implantation technique described by Le Duc et al has recently been criticized for a high rate of ureteral stricture. We assessed the rate of upper urinary tract dilatation and deterioration in 60 consecutive patients who underwent continent urinary diversion and ureteroileal anastomosis with a modified Le Duc procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 60 patients underwent continent urinary diversion with an ileal neobladder (Hautmann). Ureteroileal implantation was performed using a modified Le Duc technique. Followup was performed prospectively for a median of 32 months. The clinical end point was postoperative development of upper urinary tract dilatation, or an increase in preoperative dilatation confirmed by excretory urography or furosemide isotope nephrography. RESULTS: Nonneoplastic deterioration of the upper urinary tract was noted in 4 of 117 renoureteral units (3.4%). No permanent decrease in renal function or increase in pyelonephritic episodes was noted. CONCLUSIONS: The modified Le Duc technique is simple and safe for ureteroileal anastomosis and has a low complication rate.
M3 - SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz
VL - 160(3 Pt 1)
SP - 718
EP - 720
JO - J UROLOGY
JF - J UROLOGY
SN - 0022-5347
ER -