Improvement of ureteroileal anastomosis in continent urinary diversion with modified Le Duc procedure.

Standard

Improvement of ureteroileal anastomosis in continent urinary diversion with modified Le Duc procedure. / Schwaibold, H; Friedrich, Martin; Fernandez, S; Conrad, S; Huland, H.

in: J UROLOGY, Jahrgang 160(3 Pt 1), 1998, S. 718-720.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Schwaibold H, Friedrich M, Fernandez S, Conrad S, Huland H. Improvement of ureteroileal anastomosis in continent urinary diversion with modified Le Duc procedure. J UROLOGY. 1998;160(3 Pt 1):718-720.

Bibtex

@article{3d49ef3f25b84b738f8f097d401e9220,
title = "Improvement of ureteroileal anastomosis in continent urinary diversion with modified Le Duc procedure.",
abstract = "PURPOSE: Ureteroileal stricture after urinary diversion often has deleterious effects on the upper ureteral tract. A common ureteral implantation technique described by Le Duc et al has recently been criticized for a high rate of ureteral stricture. We assessed the rate of upper urinary tract dilatation and deterioration in 60 consecutive patients who underwent continent urinary diversion and ureteroileal anastomosis with a modified Le Duc procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 60 patients underwent continent urinary diversion with an ileal neobladder (Hautmann). Ureteroileal implantation was performed using a modified Le Duc technique. Followup was performed prospectively for a median of 32 months. The clinical end point was postoperative development of upper urinary tract dilatation, or an increase in preoperative dilatation confirmed by excretory urography or furosemide isotope nephrography. RESULTS: Nonneoplastic deterioration of the upper urinary tract was noted in 4 of 117 renoureteral units (3.4%). No permanent decrease in renal function or increase in pyelonephritic episodes was noted. CONCLUSIONS: The modified Le Duc technique is simple and safe for ureteroileal anastomosis and has a low complication rate.",
author = "H Schwaibold and Martin Friedrich and S Fernandez and S Conrad and H Huland",
year = "1998",
language = "Deutsch",
volume = "160(3 Pt 1)",
pages = "718--720",
journal = "J UROLOGY",
issn = "0022-5347",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Improvement of ureteroileal anastomosis in continent urinary diversion with modified Le Duc procedure.

AU - Schwaibold, H

AU - Friedrich, Martin

AU - Fernandez, S

AU - Conrad, S

AU - Huland, H

PY - 1998

Y1 - 1998

N2 - PURPOSE: Ureteroileal stricture after urinary diversion often has deleterious effects on the upper ureteral tract. A common ureteral implantation technique described by Le Duc et al has recently been criticized for a high rate of ureteral stricture. We assessed the rate of upper urinary tract dilatation and deterioration in 60 consecutive patients who underwent continent urinary diversion and ureteroileal anastomosis with a modified Le Duc procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 60 patients underwent continent urinary diversion with an ileal neobladder (Hautmann). Ureteroileal implantation was performed using a modified Le Duc technique. Followup was performed prospectively for a median of 32 months. The clinical end point was postoperative development of upper urinary tract dilatation, or an increase in preoperative dilatation confirmed by excretory urography or furosemide isotope nephrography. RESULTS: Nonneoplastic deterioration of the upper urinary tract was noted in 4 of 117 renoureteral units (3.4%). No permanent decrease in renal function or increase in pyelonephritic episodes was noted. CONCLUSIONS: The modified Le Duc technique is simple and safe for ureteroileal anastomosis and has a low complication rate.

AB - PURPOSE: Ureteroileal stricture after urinary diversion often has deleterious effects on the upper ureteral tract. A common ureteral implantation technique described by Le Duc et al has recently been criticized for a high rate of ureteral stricture. We assessed the rate of upper urinary tract dilatation and deterioration in 60 consecutive patients who underwent continent urinary diversion and ureteroileal anastomosis with a modified Le Duc procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 60 patients underwent continent urinary diversion with an ileal neobladder (Hautmann). Ureteroileal implantation was performed using a modified Le Duc technique. Followup was performed prospectively for a median of 32 months. The clinical end point was postoperative development of upper urinary tract dilatation, or an increase in preoperative dilatation confirmed by excretory urography or furosemide isotope nephrography. RESULTS: Nonneoplastic deterioration of the upper urinary tract was noted in 4 of 117 renoureteral units (3.4%). No permanent decrease in renal function or increase in pyelonephritic episodes was noted. CONCLUSIONS: The modified Le Duc technique is simple and safe for ureteroileal anastomosis and has a low complication rate.

M3 - SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz

VL - 160(3 Pt 1)

SP - 718

EP - 720

JO - J UROLOGY

JF - J UROLOGY

SN - 0022-5347

ER -