Impact of Donor Epstein-Barr Virus Serostatus on the Incidence of Graft-Versus-Host Disease in Patients With Acute Leukemia After Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplantation: A Study From the Acute Leukemia and Infectious Diseases Working Parties of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation

  • Jan Styczynski
  • Gloria Tridello
  • Lidia Gil
  • Per Ljungman
  • Jennifer Hoek
  • Simona Iacobelli
  • Katherine N Ward
  • Catherine Cordonnier
  • Hermann Einsele
  • Gerard Socie
  • Noel Milpied
  • Hendrik Veelken
  • Patrice Chevallier
  • Ibrahim Yakoub-Agha
  • Johan Maertens
  • Didier Blaise
  • Jan Cornelissen
  • Mauricette Michallet
  • Etienne Daguindau
  • Eefke Petersen
  • Jakob Passweg
  • Hildegard Greinix
  • Rafael F Duarte
  • Nicolaus Kröger
  • Peter Dreger
  • Mohamad Mohty
  • Arnon Nagler
  • Simone Cesaro

Abstract

PURPOSE: We investigated the effect of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) serostatus on the overall outcome of allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (allo-HSCT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included 11,364 patients who underwent allogeneic peripheral-blood or bone marrow transplantation for acute leukemia between 1997 and 2012. We analyzed the impact of donor and recipient EBV serologic status on overall survival, relapse-free survival, relapse incidence, nonrelapse mortality, and incidence of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after allo-HSCT.

RESULTS: Patients receiving grafts from EBV-seropositive donors had the same overall survival as patients who received grafts from EBV-seronegative donors (hazard ratio [HR], 1.05; 95% CI, 0.97 to 1.12; P = .23). Seropositive donors also had no influence on relapse-free survival (HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.97 to 1.11; P = 0.31), relapse incidence (HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.94 to 1.12; P = .58), and nonrelapse mortality (HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.94 to 1.17; P = .37). However, in univariate analysis, recipients receiving grafts from seropositive donors had a higher risk of chronic GVHD than those with seronegative donors (40.8% v 31.0%, respectively; P < .001; HR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.30 to 1.56). When adjusting for confounders, higher risk was identified for both acute and chronic GVHD. In seronegative patients with seropositive donors, the HR for chronic GVHD was 1.30 (95% CI, 1.06 to 1.59; P = .039). In seropositive patients with seropositive donors, the HR was 1.24 (95% CI, 1.07 to 1.45; P = .016) for acute GVHD and 1.43 (95% CI, 1.23 to 1.67; P < .001) for chronic GVHD. Seropositive patients with seronegative donors did not have an increased risk of GVHD.

CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that donor EBV status significantly influences development of acute and chronic GVHD after allo-HSCT.

Bibliographical data

Original languageEnglish
ISSN0732-183X
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01.07.2016
PubMed 27091716