Essential facets of competence that enable trust in graduates: a delphi study among physician educators in the Netherlands

Standard

Essential facets of competence that enable trust in graduates: a delphi study among physician educators in the Netherlands. / Wijnen-Meijer, Marjo; van der Schaaf, Marieke; Nillesen, Kirstin; Harendza, Sigrid; Ten Cate, Olle.

In: J Graduate Med Educ, Vol. 5, No. 1, 01.03.2013, p. 46-53.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{05b4859c4d4b401eb8baf3dabe800ae7,
title = "Essential facets of competence that enable trust in graduates: a delphi study among physician educators in the Netherlands",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: There is a need for valid methods to assess the readiness for clinical practice of recently graduated physicians. To develop these methods, it is relevant to know the general features of trainees' performance that facilitate supervisors' trust in their ability to perform critical clinical tasks.OBJECTIVE: To discover such essential facets of competence (FOCs), based on the opinion of experienced physician educators.METHODS: We conducted a Delphi study, consisting of 2 rounds, among 18 experienced physician educators in the Netherlands. Mean, standard deviation, level of agreement, and skewness were calculated for the importance of FOCs for making entrustment decisions. The study yielded a list of 25 FOCs.RESULTS: In the first round, means were between 6.50 and 7.00 on a 7-point Likert scale (SD, 0.42-2.18); in the second round, means ranged from 5.45 to 6.90 (SD, 0.3-2.02). The level of agreement was high for 92% of the FOCs in the first round and 100% of the FOCs in the second round.CONCLUSIONS: Our Delphi study found consensus among experts about FOCs that are important for clinical entrustment decisions.",
author = "Marjo Wijnen-Meijer and {van der Schaaf}, Marieke and Kirstin Nillesen and Sigrid Harendza and {Ten Cate}, Olle",
year = "2013",
month = mar,
day = "1",
doi = "10.4300/JGME-D-11-00324.1",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "46--53",
journal = "J Graduate Med Educ",
issn = "1949-8349",
publisher = "University of Finance and Management",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Essential facets of competence that enable trust in graduates: a delphi study among physician educators in the Netherlands

AU - Wijnen-Meijer, Marjo

AU - van der Schaaf, Marieke

AU - Nillesen, Kirstin

AU - Harendza, Sigrid

AU - Ten Cate, Olle

PY - 2013/3/1

Y1 - 2013/3/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: There is a need for valid methods to assess the readiness for clinical practice of recently graduated physicians. To develop these methods, it is relevant to know the general features of trainees' performance that facilitate supervisors' trust in their ability to perform critical clinical tasks.OBJECTIVE: To discover such essential facets of competence (FOCs), based on the opinion of experienced physician educators.METHODS: We conducted a Delphi study, consisting of 2 rounds, among 18 experienced physician educators in the Netherlands. Mean, standard deviation, level of agreement, and skewness were calculated for the importance of FOCs for making entrustment decisions. The study yielded a list of 25 FOCs.RESULTS: In the first round, means were between 6.50 and 7.00 on a 7-point Likert scale (SD, 0.42-2.18); in the second round, means ranged from 5.45 to 6.90 (SD, 0.3-2.02). The level of agreement was high for 92% of the FOCs in the first round and 100% of the FOCs in the second round.CONCLUSIONS: Our Delphi study found consensus among experts about FOCs that are important for clinical entrustment decisions.

AB - BACKGROUND: There is a need for valid methods to assess the readiness for clinical practice of recently graduated physicians. To develop these methods, it is relevant to know the general features of trainees' performance that facilitate supervisors' trust in their ability to perform critical clinical tasks.OBJECTIVE: To discover such essential facets of competence (FOCs), based on the opinion of experienced physician educators.METHODS: We conducted a Delphi study, consisting of 2 rounds, among 18 experienced physician educators in the Netherlands. Mean, standard deviation, level of agreement, and skewness were calculated for the importance of FOCs for making entrustment decisions. The study yielded a list of 25 FOCs.RESULTS: In the first round, means were between 6.50 and 7.00 on a 7-point Likert scale (SD, 0.42-2.18); in the second round, means ranged from 5.45 to 6.90 (SD, 0.3-2.02). The level of agreement was high for 92% of the FOCs in the first round and 100% of the FOCs in the second round.CONCLUSIONS: Our Delphi study found consensus among experts about FOCs that are important for clinical entrustment decisions.

U2 - 10.4300/JGME-D-11-00324.1

DO - 10.4300/JGME-D-11-00324.1

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 24404226

VL - 5

SP - 46

EP - 53

JO - J Graduate Med Educ

JF - J Graduate Med Educ

SN - 1949-8349

IS - 1

ER -