Endovaskuläre vs. konventionelle Gefäßchirurgie – antiquiertes Denken?: Teil 2: Karotisstenose und periphere arterielle Verschlusskrankheit

E. S. Debus; D. Manzoni; C. A. Behrendt; F. Heidemann; R. T. Grundmann

doi:10.1007/s00104-015-0149-y

Endovaskuläre vs. konventionelle Gefäßchirurgie – antiquiertes Denken?

Standard

Endovaskuläre vs. konventionelle Gefäßchirurgie – antiquiertes Denken? Teil 2: Karotisstenose und periphere arterielle Verschlusskrankheit. / Debus, E. S.; Manzoni, D.; Behrendt, C. A.; Heidemann, F.; Grundmann, R. T.

In: CHIRURG, Vol. 87, No. 4, 01.04.2016, p. 308-315.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journal › SCORING: Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Debus, ES, Manzoni, D, Behrendt, CA, Heidemann, F & Grundmann, RT 2016, 'Endovaskuläre vs. konventionelle Gefäßchirurgie – antiquiertes Denken? Teil 2: Karotisstenose und periphere arterielle Verschlusskrankheit', CHIRURG, vol. 87, no. 4, pp. 308-315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-015-0149-y

APA

Debus, E. S., Manzoni, D., Behrendt, C. A., Heidemann, F., & Grundmann, R. T. (2016). Endovaskuläre vs. konventionelle Gefäßchirurgie – antiquiertes Denken? Teil 2: Karotisstenose und periphere arterielle Verschlusskrankheit. CHIRURG, 87(4), 308-315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-015-0149-y

Vancouver

Debus ES, Manzoni D, Behrendt CA, Heidemann F, Grundmann RT. Endovaskuläre vs. konventionelle Gefäßchirurgie – antiquiertes Denken? Teil 2: Karotisstenose und periphere arterielle Verschlusskrankheit. CHIRURG. 2016 Apr 1;87(4):308-315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-015-0149-y

Bibtex

@article{311bce415f194832aba5056309a8baed,

title = "Endovaskul{\"a}re vs. konventionelle Gef{\"a}{\ss}chirurgie – antiquiertes Denken?: Teil 2: Karotisstenose und periphere arterielle Verschlusskrankheit",

abstract = "Endovascular therapy has widely replaced conventional open vascular surgical reconstruction. For this reason, both techniques were widely considered to be competing approaches. Evidence-based data from randomized prospective trials, meta-analyses and clinical registries, however, demonstrated that both techniques should be used to complement each other. It became increasingly more evident that the use of either procedure depends on the underlying disease and the anatomical conditions, whereby a combination of both (hybrid approach) may be the preferred option in certain situations. This review focuses on the treatment of patients with carotid artery stenosis, intermittent claudication, critical limb ischemia and acute limb ischemia.",

keywords = "Acute limb ischemia, Carotid artery stenosis, Critical limb ischemia, Endovascular, Intermittent claudication",

author = "Debus, {E. S.} and D. Manzoni and Behrendt, {C. A.} and F. Heidemann and Grundmann, {R. T.}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2016, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.",

year = "2016",

month = apr,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1007/s00104-015-0149-y",

language = "Deutsch",

volume = "87",

pages = "308--315",

journal = "CHIRURG",

issn = "0009-4722",

publisher = "Springer",

number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Endovaskuläre vs. konventionelle Gefäßchirurgie – antiquiertes Denken?

T2 - Teil 2: Karotisstenose und periphere arterielle Verschlusskrankheit

AU - Debus, E. S.

AU - Manzoni, D.

AU - Behrendt, C. A.

AU - Heidemann, F.

AU - Grundmann, R. T.

PY - 2016/4/1

Y1 - 2016/4/1

N2 - Endovascular therapy has widely replaced conventional open vascular surgical reconstruction. For this reason, both techniques were widely considered to be competing approaches. Evidence-based data from randomized prospective trials, meta-analyses and clinical registries, however, demonstrated that both techniques should be used to complement each other. It became increasingly more evident that the use of either procedure depends on the underlying disease and the anatomical conditions, whereby a combination of both (hybrid approach) may be the preferred option in certain situations. This review focuses on the treatment of patients with carotid artery stenosis, intermittent claudication, critical limb ischemia and acute limb ischemia.

AB - Endovascular therapy has widely replaced conventional open vascular surgical reconstruction. For this reason, both techniques were widely considered to be competing approaches. Evidence-based data from randomized prospective trials, meta-analyses and clinical registries, however, demonstrated that both techniques should be used to complement each other. It became increasingly more evident that the use of either procedure depends on the underlying disease and the anatomical conditions, whereby a combination of both (hybrid approach) may be the preferred option in certain situations. This review focuses on the treatment of patients with carotid artery stenosis, intermittent claudication, critical limb ischemia and acute limb ischemia.

KW - Acute limb ischemia

KW - Carotid artery stenosis

KW - Critical limb ischemia

KW - Endovascular

KW - Intermittent claudication

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84955285062&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00104-015-0149-y

DO - 10.1007/s00104-015-0149-y

M3 - SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz

C2 - 26801751

AN - SCOPUS:84955285062

VL - 87

SP - 308

EP - 315

JO - CHIRURG

JF - CHIRURG

SN - 0009-4722

IS - 4

ER -