Endovaskuläre vs. konventionelle Gefäßchirurgie – antiquiertes Denken?
Standard
Endovaskuläre vs. konventionelle Gefäßchirurgie – antiquiertes Denken? Teil 2: Karotisstenose und periphere arterielle Verschlusskrankheit. / Debus, E. S.; Manzoni, D.; Behrendt, C. A.; Heidemann, F.; Grundmann, R. T.
in: CHIRURG, Jahrgang 87, Nr. 4, 01.04.2016, S. 308-315.Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/Zeitung › SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz › Forschung › Begutachtung
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Endovaskuläre vs. konventionelle Gefäßchirurgie – antiquiertes Denken?
T2 - Teil 2: Karotisstenose und periphere arterielle Verschlusskrankheit
AU - Debus, E. S.
AU - Manzoni, D.
AU - Behrendt, C. A.
AU - Heidemann, F.
AU - Grundmann, R. T.
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2016, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
PY - 2016/4/1
Y1 - 2016/4/1
N2 - Endovascular therapy has widely replaced conventional open vascular surgical reconstruction. For this reason, both techniques were widely considered to be competing approaches. Evidence-based data from randomized prospective trials, meta-analyses and clinical registries, however, demonstrated that both techniques should be used to complement each other. It became increasingly more evident that the use of either procedure depends on the underlying disease and the anatomical conditions, whereby a combination of both (hybrid approach) may be the preferred option in certain situations. This review focuses on the treatment of patients with carotid artery stenosis, intermittent claudication, critical limb ischemia and acute limb ischemia.
AB - Endovascular therapy has widely replaced conventional open vascular surgical reconstruction. For this reason, both techniques were widely considered to be competing approaches. Evidence-based data from randomized prospective trials, meta-analyses and clinical registries, however, demonstrated that both techniques should be used to complement each other. It became increasingly more evident that the use of either procedure depends on the underlying disease and the anatomical conditions, whereby a combination of both (hybrid approach) may be the preferred option in certain situations. This review focuses on the treatment of patients with carotid artery stenosis, intermittent claudication, critical limb ischemia and acute limb ischemia.
KW - Acute limb ischemia
KW - Carotid artery stenosis
KW - Critical limb ischemia
KW - Endovascular
KW - Intermittent claudication
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84955285062&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00104-015-0149-y
DO - 10.1007/s00104-015-0149-y
M3 - SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz
C2 - 26801751
AN - SCOPUS:84955285062
VL - 87
SP - 308
EP - 315
JO - CHIRURG
JF - CHIRURG
SN - 0009-4722
IS - 4
ER -