Efficacy and safety of gadodiamide (Gd-DTPA-BMA) in renal 3D-magnetic resonance angiography (MRA): a phase II study.

  • Thomas Kittner
  • Jens Rudolf
  • Joan Falco Fages
  • Paul Legmann
  • Manuela Aschauer
  • Imre Repa
  • Marta Rodriguez Alvares
  • Ibone Savalegui
  • Harald Ittrich
  • Kjell Geterud
  • Eric de Kevviler
  • Juan Ayuso
  • Mark E Lockhart
  • Alain Blum
  • Herbert Iliasch
  • Gerda Leisinger
  • E J R van Beek
  • Allan W Reid
  • Jeffrey J Brown
  • Thomas C Yu
  • Scott D Flamm
  • Christoph Düber
  • Werner Judmaier
  • Peter Reimer
  • Michael Stiskal
  • Bernhard Kramann
  • Steve Wolff
  • Christiane Blankenstein

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the most efficacious dose of gadodiamide for three-dimensional (3D) contrast-enhanced (CE) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) of the renal arteries on a patient level based on the sensitivity in detecting the main hemodynamically relevant (> or =50% or occlusion) renal artery stenosis (RAS) using intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography (IA DSA) as the gold standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multicenter study included 273 patients referred to IA DSA for suspected RAS. Patients underwent 3D CE MRA after injection of 0.01, 0.05, 0.1, or 0.2mmol/kg of body weight gadodiamide (0.5mmol/ml). The images were assessed for location and degree of RAS by independent blinded readers (MRA: three readers, IA DSA: one reader). Hypothesis testing for a significant trend in sensitivity across dose groups was based on the one-sided Cochran-Armitage style trend test for each independent MRA reader. RESULTS: The lowest dose group (0.01mmol/kg) proved non-efficacious in detecting hemodynamically relevant (i.e., > or =50% or occlusion) RAS. A statistically significant dose trend (p

Bibliographical data

Original languageEnglish
Article number3
ISSN0720-048X
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01.12.2007