Donor Cornea Harvest Techniques: Comparison Between Globe Enucleation and In Situ Corneoscleral Disc Excision
Standard
Donor Cornea Harvest Techniques: Comparison Between Globe Enucleation and In Situ Corneoscleral Disc Excision. / Filev, Filip; Bigdon, Eileen; Steinhorst, Nils Alexander; Kammal, A; Schröder, Carolin; Wulff, Birgit; Linke, Stephan; Feuerstacke, Jana; Hellwinkel, Olaf.
In: CORNEA, Vol. 37, No. 8, 05.2018, p. 957-963.Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journal › SCORING: Journal article › Research
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Donor Cornea Harvest Techniques: Comparison Between Globe Enucleation and In Situ Corneoscleral Disc Excision
AU - Filev, Filip
AU - Bigdon, Eileen
AU - Steinhorst, Nils Alexander
AU - Kammal, A
AU - Schröder, Carolin
AU - Wulff, Birgit
AU - Linke, Stephan
AU - Feuerstacke, Jana
AU - Hellwinkel, Olaf
PY - 2018/5
Y1 - 2018/5
N2 - PURPOSE: To compare whole eye enucleation and corneoscleral disc (CD) excision as donor cornea harvesting techniques for possible effects on corneal cultivation and the clinical outcome of the corneal grafts after transplantation in 2929 cases.METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on the Hamburg Eye Bank database using comparative statistics. The standard method for donor cornea recovery at the Hamburg Eye Bank changed from enucleation of the whole eye to CD in situ excision in 2008. Corneas recovered between 2003 and 2013 were included in this study. We compared the contamination rate, the endothelial density after retrieval, endothelial cell loss during cultivation, and the clinical outcome (visual acuity, astigmatism, and refraction) of transplanted corneas.RESULTS: Once the retrieval method was changed from whole globe enucleation to in situ CD excision, the donation numbers increased (after several years of constant decrease). Furthermore, we observed slightly lower endothelial cell density after retrieval in corneas obtained by in situ CD excision compared with those from enucleated eyes, whereas endothelial cell loss during cultivation was similar. After changing the recovery procedure to in situ excision, initially a higher rate of contamination was observed, but but it eventually decreased. Finally, the corneas of both groups had a similar clinical outcome.CONCLUSIONS: After a transient technical learning period, in situ CD excision proved to be a method of donor cornea recovery with similar cultivation performance and clinical results compared with whole eye enucleation. It also may have led to higher willingness to donate, possibly because of better acceptance by the relatives of the deceased.
AB - PURPOSE: To compare whole eye enucleation and corneoscleral disc (CD) excision as donor cornea harvesting techniques for possible effects on corneal cultivation and the clinical outcome of the corneal grafts after transplantation in 2929 cases.METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on the Hamburg Eye Bank database using comparative statistics. The standard method for donor cornea recovery at the Hamburg Eye Bank changed from enucleation of the whole eye to CD in situ excision in 2008. Corneas recovered between 2003 and 2013 were included in this study. We compared the contamination rate, the endothelial density after retrieval, endothelial cell loss during cultivation, and the clinical outcome (visual acuity, astigmatism, and refraction) of transplanted corneas.RESULTS: Once the retrieval method was changed from whole globe enucleation to in situ CD excision, the donation numbers increased (after several years of constant decrease). Furthermore, we observed slightly lower endothelial cell density after retrieval in corneas obtained by in situ CD excision compared with those from enucleated eyes, whereas endothelial cell loss during cultivation was similar. After changing the recovery procedure to in situ excision, initially a higher rate of contamination was observed, but but it eventually decreased. Finally, the corneas of both groups had a similar clinical outcome.CONCLUSIONS: After a transient technical learning period, in situ CD excision proved to be a method of donor cornea recovery with similar cultivation performance and clinical results compared with whole eye enucleation. It also may have led to higher willingness to donate, possibly because of better acceptance by the relatives of the deceased.
KW - Cell Count
KW - Corneal Transplantation
KW - Endothelium, Corneal
KW - Eye Banks
KW - Eye Enucleation
KW - Humans
KW - Organ Preservation
KW - Retrospective Studies
KW - Tissue Donors
KW - Tissue and Organ Harvesting
KW - Tissue and Organ Procurement
KW - Comparative Study
KW - Journal Article
U2 - 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001622
DO - 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001622
M3 - SCORING: Journal article
C2 - 29746326
VL - 37
SP - 957
EP - 963
JO - CORNEA
JF - CORNEA
SN - 0277-3740
IS - 8
ER -