Donor Cornea Harvest Techniques: Comparison Between Globe Enucleation and In Situ Corneoscleral Disc Excision

Standard

Donor Cornea Harvest Techniques: Comparison Between Globe Enucleation and In Situ Corneoscleral Disc Excision. / Filev, Filip; Bigdon, Eileen; Steinhorst, Nils Alexander; Kammal, A; Schröder, Carolin; Wulff, Birgit; Linke, Stephan; Feuerstacke, Jana; Hellwinkel, Olaf.

in: CORNEA, Jahrgang 37, Nr. 8, 05.2018, S. 957-963.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschung

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{14502ebb446d42afafe839c44d310102,
title = "Donor Cornea Harvest Techniques: Comparison Between Globe Enucleation and In Situ Corneoscleral Disc Excision",
abstract = "PURPOSE: To compare whole eye enucleation and corneoscleral disc (CD) excision as donor cornea harvesting techniques for possible effects on corneal cultivation and the clinical outcome of the corneal grafts after transplantation in 2929 cases.METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on the Hamburg Eye Bank database using comparative statistics. The standard method for donor cornea recovery at the Hamburg Eye Bank changed from enucleation of the whole eye to CD in situ excision in 2008. Corneas recovered between 2003 and 2013 were included in this study. We compared the contamination rate, the endothelial density after retrieval, endothelial cell loss during cultivation, and the clinical outcome (visual acuity, astigmatism, and refraction) of transplanted corneas.RESULTS: Once the retrieval method was changed from whole globe enucleation to in situ CD excision, the donation numbers increased (after several years of constant decrease). Furthermore, we observed slightly lower endothelial cell density after retrieval in corneas obtained by in situ CD excision compared with those from enucleated eyes, whereas endothelial cell loss during cultivation was similar. After changing the recovery procedure to in situ excision, initially a higher rate of contamination was observed, but but it eventually decreased. Finally, the corneas of both groups had a similar clinical outcome.CONCLUSIONS: After a transient technical learning period, in situ CD excision proved to be a method of donor cornea recovery with similar cultivation performance and clinical results compared with whole eye enucleation. It also may have led to higher willingness to donate, possibly because of better acceptance by the relatives of the deceased.",
keywords = "Cell Count, Corneal Transplantation, Endothelium, Corneal, Eye Banks, Eye Enucleation, Humans, Organ Preservation, Retrospective Studies, Tissue Donors, Tissue and Organ Harvesting, Tissue and Organ Procurement, Comparative Study, Journal Article",
author = "Filip Filev and Eileen Bigdon and Steinhorst, {Nils Alexander} and A Kammal and Carolin Schr{\"o}der and Birgit Wulff and Stephan Linke and Jana Feuerstacke and Olaf Hellwinkel",
year = "2018",
month = may,
doi = "10.1097/ICO.0000000000001622",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "957--963",
journal = "CORNEA",
issn = "0277-3740",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "8",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Donor Cornea Harvest Techniques: Comparison Between Globe Enucleation and In Situ Corneoscleral Disc Excision

AU - Filev, Filip

AU - Bigdon, Eileen

AU - Steinhorst, Nils Alexander

AU - Kammal, A

AU - Schröder, Carolin

AU - Wulff, Birgit

AU - Linke, Stephan

AU - Feuerstacke, Jana

AU - Hellwinkel, Olaf

PY - 2018/5

Y1 - 2018/5

N2 - PURPOSE: To compare whole eye enucleation and corneoscleral disc (CD) excision as donor cornea harvesting techniques for possible effects on corneal cultivation and the clinical outcome of the corneal grafts after transplantation in 2929 cases.METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on the Hamburg Eye Bank database using comparative statistics. The standard method for donor cornea recovery at the Hamburg Eye Bank changed from enucleation of the whole eye to CD in situ excision in 2008. Corneas recovered between 2003 and 2013 were included in this study. We compared the contamination rate, the endothelial density after retrieval, endothelial cell loss during cultivation, and the clinical outcome (visual acuity, astigmatism, and refraction) of transplanted corneas.RESULTS: Once the retrieval method was changed from whole globe enucleation to in situ CD excision, the donation numbers increased (after several years of constant decrease). Furthermore, we observed slightly lower endothelial cell density after retrieval in corneas obtained by in situ CD excision compared with those from enucleated eyes, whereas endothelial cell loss during cultivation was similar. After changing the recovery procedure to in situ excision, initially a higher rate of contamination was observed, but but it eventually decreased. Finally, the corneas of both groups had a similar clinical outcome.CONCLUSIONS: After a transient technical learning period, in situ CD excision proved to be a method of donor cornea recovery with similar cultivation performance and clinical results compared with whole eye enucleation. It also may have led to higher willingness to donate, possibly because of better acceptance by the relatives of the deceased.

AB - PURPOSE: To compare whole eye enucleation and corneoscleral disc (CD) excision as donor cornea harvesting techniques for possible effects on corneal cultivation and the clinical outcome of the corneal grafts after transplantation in 2929 cases.METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on the Hamburg Eye Bank database using comparative statistics. The standard method for donor cornea recovery at the Hamburg Eye Bank changed from enucleation of the whole eye to CD in situ excision in 2008. Corneas recovered between 2003 and 2013 were included in this study. We compared the contamination rate, the endothelial density after retrieval, endothelial cell loss during cultivation, and the clinical outcome (visual acuity, astigmatism, and refraction) of transplanted corneas.RESULTS: Once the retrieval method was changed from whole globe enucleation to in situ CD excision, the donation numbers increased (after several years of constant decrease). Furthermore, we observed slightly lower endothelial cell density after retrieval in corneas obtained by in situ CD excision compared with those from enucleated eyes, whereas endothelial cell loss during cultivation was similar. After changing the recovery procedure to in situ excision, initially a higher rate of contamination was observed, but but it eventually decreased. Finally, the corneas of both groups had a similar clinical outcome.CONCLUSIONS: After a transient technical learning period, in situ CD excision proved to be a method of donor cornea recovery with similar cultivation performance and clinical results compared with whole eye enucleation. It also may have led to higher willingness to donate, possibly because of better acceptance by the relatives of the deceased.

KW - Cell Count

KW - Corneal Transplantation

KW - Endothelium, Corneal

KW - Eye Banks

KW - Eye Enucleation

KW - Humans

KW - Organ Preservation

KW - Retrospective Studies

KW - Tissue Donors

KW - Tissue and Organ Harvesting

KW - Tissue and Organ Procurement

KW - Comparative Study

KW - Journal Article

U2 - 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001622

DO - 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001622

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 29746326

VL - 37

SP - 957

EP - 963

JO - CORNEA

JF - CORNEA

SN - 0277-3740

IS - 8

ER -