CO₂ versus air insufflation for private practice routine colonoscopy: results of a randomized double blind trial

Standard

CO₂ versus air insufflation for private practice routine colonoscopy: results of a randomized double blind trial. / Mayr, M; Miller, A; Gauger, U; Rösch, Thomas.

In: Z GASTROENTEROL, Vol. 50, No. 5, 5, 01.05.2012, p. 445-448.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{cdf8b158c8fc4c87a986446f5ed10155,
title = "CO₂ versus air insufflation for private practice routine colonoscopy: results of a randomized double blind trial",
abstract = "Pain and bloating following colonoscopy are an underestimated problem, with 30 - 60 % of patients complaining of such symptoms. The use of CO? has been shown to significantly decrease pain after colonoscopy in academic hospital-based studies. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether such an effect can also be seen during private practice routine colonoscopy.",
keywords = "Adult, Humans, Male, Aged, Female, Middle Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Young Adult, Treatment Outcome, Double-Blind Method, Abdominal Pain/diagnosis/*etiology/*prevention & control, *Air, Carbon Dioxide/*administration & dosage, Colonoscopy/*adverse effects, Insufflation/*methods, Adult, Humans, Male, Aged, Female, Middle Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Young Adult, Treatment Outcome, Double-Blind Method, Abdominal Pain/diagnosis/*etiology/*prevention & control, *Air, Carbon Dioxide/*administration & dosage, Colonoscopy/*adverse effects, Insufflation/*methods",
author = "M Mayr and A Miller and U Gauger and Thomas R{\"o}sch",
note = "{\textcopyright} Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.",
year = "2012",
month = may,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1055/s-0031-1299076",
language = "English",
volume = "50",
pages = "445--448",
journal = "Z GASTROENTEROL",
issn = "0044-2771",
publisher = "Karl Demeter Verlag GmbH",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - CO₂ versus air insufflation for private practice routine colonoscopy: results of a randomized double blind trial

AU - Mayr, M

AU - Miller, A

AU - Gauger, U

AU - Rösch, Thomas

N1 - © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

PY - 2012/5/1

Y1 - 2012/5/1

N2 - Pain and bloating following colonoscopy are an underestimated problem, with 30 - 60 % of patients complaining of such symptoms. The use of CO? has been shown to significantly decrease pain after colonoscopy in academic hospital-based studies. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether such an effect can also be seen during private practice routine colonoscopy.

AB - Pain and bloating following colonoscopy are an underestimated problem, with 30 - 60 % of patients complaining of such symptoms. The use of CO? has been shown to significantly decrease pain after colonoscopy in academic hospital-based studies. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether such an effect can also be seen during private practice routine colonoscopy.

KW - Adult

KW - Humans

KW - Male

KW - Aged

KW - Female

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Aged, 80 and over

KW - Young Adult

KW - Treatment Outcome

KW - Double-Blind Method

KW - Abdominal Pain/diagnosis/etiology/prevention & control

KW - Air

KW - Carbon Dioxide/administration & dosage

KW - Colonoscopy/adverse effects

KW - Insufflation/methods

KW - Adult

KW - Humans

KW - Male

KW - Aged

KW - Female

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Aged, 80 and over

KW - Young Adult

KW - Treatment Outcome

KW - Double-Blind Method

KW - Abdominal Pain/diagnosis/etiology/prevention & control

KW - Air

KW - Carbon Dioxide/administration & dosage

KW - Colonoscopy/adverse effects

KW - Insufflation/methods

U2 - 10.1055/s-0031-1299076

DO - 10.1055/s-0031-1299076

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 22581698

VL - 50

SP - 445

EP - 448

JO - Z GASTROENTEROL

JF - Z GASTROENTEROL

SN - 0044-2771

IS - 5

M1 - 5

ER -