Attitudes of patients with schizophrenia and depression to psychiatric research: a study in seven European countries.

Standard

Attitudes of patients with schizophrenia and depression to psychiatric research: a study in seven European countries. / Schäfer, Ingo; Burns, Tom; Fleischhacker, W Wolfgang; Galderisi, Silvana; Rybakowski, Janusz K; Libiger, Jan; Rössler, Wulf; Molodynski, Andrew; Edlinger, Monika; Piegari, Giuseppe; Jela, Hrn Iarova; Gorna, Krystyna; Jaeger, Matthias; Fett, Anne-Kathrin; Hissbach, Johanna; Naber, Dieter.

In: SOC PSYCH PSYCH EPID, Vol. 46, No. 2, 2, 2011, p. 159-165.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Schäfer, I, Burns, T, Fleischhacker, WW, Galderisi, S, Rybakowski, JK, Libiger, J, Rössler, W, Molodynski, A, Edlinger, M, Piegari, G, Jela, HI, Gorna, K, Jaeger, M, Fett, A-K, Hissbach, J & Naber, D 2011, 'Attitudes of patients with schizophrenia and depression to psychiatric research: a study in seven European countries.', SOC PSYCH PSYCH EPID, vol. 46, no. 2, 2, pp. 159-165. <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20119828?dopt=Citation>

APA

Schäfer, I., Burns, T., Fleischhacker, W. W., Galderisi, S., Rybakowski, J. K., Libiger, J., Rössler, W., Molodynski, A., Edlinger, M., Piegari, G., Jela, H. I., Gorna, K., Jaeger, M., Fett, A-K., Hissbach, J., & Naber, D. (2011). Attitudes of patients with schizophrenia and depression to psychiatric research: a study in seven European countries. SOC PSYCH PSYCH EPID, 46(2), 159-165. [2]. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20119828?dopt=Citation

Vancouver

Schäfer I, Burns T, Fleischhacker WW, Galderisi S, Rybakowski JK, Libiger J et al. Attitudes of patients with schizophrenia and depression to psychiatric research: a study in seven European countries. SOC PSYCH PSYCH EPID. 2011;46(2):159-165. 2.

Bibtex

@article{d2dbaca40b104c57a6885ed6c8107945,
title = "Attitudes of patients with schizophrenia and depression to psychiatric research: a study in seven European countries.",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Relatively few studies have examined how patients with schizophrenia and depression view psychiatric research and what influences their readiness to participate. METHODS: A total of 763 patients (48% schizophrenia, 52% depression) from 7 European countries were examined using a specifically designed self-report questionnaire [{"}Hamburg Attitudes to Psychiatric Research Questionnaire{"} (HAPRQ)]. RESULTS: Most patients (98%) approved of psychiatric research, in general, at least {"}a little{"}. There was a tendency to approve psychosocial rather than biological research topics (e.g. research on the role of the family by 91% of patients compared to 79% in genetics). Reasons to participate were mainly altruistic. Only a minority (28%) considered monetary incentives important. Patients wanted extensive background information and a feedback of the results; both were significantly more expressed by schizophrenia as compared to depressive patients, although these findings need to be interpreted with care because of age and gender differences between the diagnostic groups. CONCLUSION: While patients expressed discerning views of psychiatric research, only few differences were apparent between the two diagnostic groups. Patients' research priorities are not the same as those of many professionals and funding bodies. Their demonstrated critical appraisal should inform future research ensuring an increased patient role in the research process.",
author = "Ingo Sch{\"a}fer and Tom Burns and Fleischhacker, {W Wolfgang} and Silvana Galderisi and Rybakowski, {Janusz K} and Jan Libiger and Wulf R{\"o}ssler and Andrew Molodynski and Monika Edlinger and Giuseppe Piegari and Jela, {Hrn Iarova} and Krystyna Gorna and Matthias Jaeger and Anne-Kathrin Fett and Johanna Hissbach and Dieter Naber",
year = "2011",
language = "Deutsch",
volume = "46",
pages = "159--165",
journal = "SOC PSYCH PSYCH EPID",
issn = "0933-7954",
publisher = "D. Steinkopff-Verlag",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Attitudes of patients with schizophrenia and depression to psychiatric research: a study in seven European countries.

AU - Schäfer, Ingo

AU - Burns, Tom

AU - Fleischhacker, W Wolfgang

AU - Galderisi, Silvana

AU - Rybakowski, Janusz K

AU - Libiger, Jan

AU - Rössler, Wulf

AU - Molodynski, Andrew

AU - Edlinger, Monika

AU - Piegari, Giuseppe

AU - Jela, Hrn Iarova

AU - Gorna, Krystyna

AU - Jaeger, Matthias

AU - Fett, Anne-Kathrin

AU - Hissbach, Johanna

AU - Naber, Dieter

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - BACKGROUND: Relatively few studies have examined how patients with schizophrenia and depression view psychiatric research and what influences their readiness to participate. METHODS: A total of 763 patients (48% schizophrenia, 52% depression) from 7 European countries were examined using a specifically designed self-report questionnaire ["Hamburg Attitudes to Psychiatric Research Questionnaire" (HAPRQ)]. RESULTS: Most patients (98%) approved of psychiatric research, in general, at least "a little". There was a tendency to approve psychosocial rather than biological research topics (e.g. research on the role of the family by 91% of patients compared to 79% in genetics). Reasons to participate were mainly altruistic. Only a minority (28%) considered monetary incentives important. Patients wanted extensive background information and a feedback of the results; both were significantly more expressed by schizophrenia as compared to depressive patients, although these findings need to be interpreted with care because of age and gender differences between the diagnostic groups. CONCLUSION: While patients expressed discerning views of psychiatric research, only few differences were apparent between the two diagnostic groups. Patients' research priorities are not the same as those of many professionals and funding bodies. Their demonstrated critical appraisal should inform future research ensuring an increased patient role in the research process.

AB - BACKGROUND: Relatively few studies have examined how patients with schizophrenia and depression view psychiatric research and what influences their readiness to participate. METHODS: A total of 763 patients (48% schizophrenia, 52% depression) from 7 European countries were examined using a specifically designed self-report questionnaire ["Hamburg Attitudes to Psychiatric Research Questionnaire" (HAPRQ)]. RESULTS: Most patients (98%) approved of psychiatric research, in general, at least "a little". There was a tendency to approve psychosocial rather than biological research topics (e.g. research on the role of the family by 91% of patients compared to 79% in genetics). Reasons to participate were mainly altruistic. Only a minority (28%) considered monetary incentives important. Patients wanted extensive background information and a feedback of the results; both were significantly more expressed by schizophrenia as compared to depressive patients, although these findings need to be interpreted with care because of age and gender differences between the diagnostic groups. CONCLUSION: While patients expressed discerning views of psychiatric research, only few differences were apparent between the two diagnostic groups. Patients' research priorities are not the same as those of many professionals and funding bodies. Their demonstrated critical appraisal should inform future research ensuring an increased patient role in the research process.

M3 - SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz

VL - 46

SP - 159

EP - 165

JO - SOC PSYCH PSYCH EPID

JF - SOC PSYCH PSYCH EPID

SN - 0933-7954

IS - 2

M1 - 2

ER -