Response of radiation protection dosemeters in mixed high-energy photon and electron radiation fields.
Standard
Response of radiation protection dosemeters in mixed high-energy photon and electron radiation fields. / Büermann, L; Gargioni, Elisabetta; Kramer, H M.
in: RADIAT PROT DOSIM, Jahrgang 96, Nr. 1-3, 1-3, 2001, S. 223-226.Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/Zeitung › SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz › Forschung › Begutachtung
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Response of radiation protection dosemeters in mixed high-energy photon and electron radiation fields.
AU - Büermann, L
AU - Gargioni, Elisabetta
AU - Kramer, H M
PY - 2001
Y1 - 2001
N2 - The response of radiation protection dosemeters in terms of the phantom-related operational quantities Hp(10) and H'(10.0 degrees) was measured for personal and area monitoring systems in mixed high-energy electron and photon radiation fields with energies up to 7 MeV. Using mixed radiation fields composed of different fractions of charged particle and photon fluence, three conditions were produced at the point of measurement: charged particle equilibrium (CPE) (a), a lack (b) and an excess (c) of charged particles relative to the conditions of CPE. Personal and area dosemeters of different types were investigated under conditions (a)-(c). A large variability of the response of the different dosemeter types was observed. The results are presented and discussed.
AB - The response of radiation protection dosemeters in terms of the phantom-related operational quantities Hp(10) and H'(10.0 degrees) was measured for personal and area monitoring systems in mixed high-energy electron and photon radiation fields with energies up to 7 MeV. Using mixed radiation fields composed of different fractions of charged particle and photon fluence, three conditions were produced at the point of measurement: charged particle equilibrium (CPE) (a), a lack (b) and an excess (c) of charged particles relative to the conditions of CPE. Personal and area dosemeters of different types were investigated under conditions (a)-(c). A large variability of the response of the different dosemeter types was observed. The results are presented and discussed.
M3 - SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz
VL - 96
SP - 223
EP - 226
JO - RADIAT PROT DOSIM
JF - RADIAT PROT DOSIM
SN - 0144-8420
IS - 1-3
M1 - 1-3
ER -