Prognosis of multifactorial outcome in lumbar discectomy: a prospective longitudinal study investigating patients with disc prolapse

Standard

Prognosis of multifactorial outcome in lumbar discectomy: a prospective longitudinal study investigating patients with disc prolapse. / Kohlboeck, Gabriele; Greimel, Karoline Verena; Piotrowski, Wolfgang Peter; Leibetseder, Max; Krombholz-Reindl, Martin; Neuhofer, Reinhold; Schmid, Alois; Klinger, Regine.

in: CLIN J PAIN, Jahrgang 20, Nr. 6, 27.10.2004, S. 455-61.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

Kohlboeck, G, Greimel, KV, Piotrowski, WP, Leibetseder, M, Krombholz-Reindl, M, Neuhofer, R, Schmid, A & Klinger, R 2004, 'Prognosis of multifactorial outcome in lumbar discectomy: a prospective longitudinal study investigating patients with disc prolapse', CLIN J PAIN, Jg. 20, Nr. 6, S. 455-61.

APA

Kohlboeck, G., Greimel, K. V., Piotrowski, W. P., Leibetseder, M., Krombholz-Reindl, M., Neuhofer, R., Schmid, A., & Klinger, R. (2004). Prognosis of multifactorial outcome in lumbar discectomy: a prospective longitudinal study investigating patients with disc prolapse. CLIN J PAIN, 20(6), 455-61.

Vancouver

Kohlboeck G, Greimel KV, Piotrowski WP, Leibetseder M, Krombholz-Reindl M, Neuhofer R et al. Prognosis of multifactorial outcome in lumbar discectomy: a prospective longitudinal study investigating patients with disc prolapse. CLIN J PAIN. 2004 Okt 27;20(6):455-61.

Bibtex

@article{3d92cc581eac4dcaaaf38739ab83b9a1,
title = "Prognosis of multifactorial outcome in lumbar discectomy: a prospective longitudinal study investigating patients with disc prolapse",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: Although previous research has shown that certain medical data and psychosocial factors predict postoperative pain, it remains unclear whether they also contribute to a more distinct outcome measure that is based on classification of self-reported outcome criteria. To assess the prognostic power of somatic, psychologic, and social predictors when evident outcome criteria of surgical treatment are investigated, this study used a prospective longitudinal design examining preoperative factors associated with outcome six months after lumbar discectomy.METHODS: Forty-eight out of 58 consecutive patients were included (60% male, 40% female, mean age 47 years). Preoperative data comprised of Lasegue sign (straight leg raising test), pain duration, paresis and radicular distribution, depression, pain disability, pain coping strategies, and qualitative descriptions of pain. Additionally, sociodemographic and occupational characteristics were observed. Six months' postoperative classification of outcome included pain intensity, pain locations, functional capacity, return to work, and health-related quality of life.RESULTS: From a surgical point of view, lumbar discectomy was successfully carried out on all patients. But, when subjective criteria of outcome were investigated, 56% of patients benefited from lumbar discectomy, whereas 44% of patients had poor results. Lasegue sign, depression, and sensory pain descriptions proved to be significant predictors, whereas pain cognition and pain coping strategies had no significant influence on evident outcome classification.DISCUSSION: Classification of patients regarding their individual outcome profiles showed that patients responded differently to lumbar disc-surgery. High risk factors for poor outcome of surgery are Laseque-sign and depression.",
keywords = "Adult, Aged, Cluster Analysis, Disability Evaluation, Diskectomy, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Health Status Indicators, Humans, Intervertebral Disc Displacement, Low Back Pain, Lumbar Vertebrae, Male, Middle Aged, Outcome Assessment (Health Care), Pain Measurement, Predictive Value of Tests, Prognosis, Prospective Studies, Quality of Life, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Clinical Trial, Comparative Study, Journal Article",
author = "Gabriele Kohlboeck and Greimel, {Karoline Verena} and Piotrowski, {Wolfgang Peter} and Max Leibetseder and Martin Krombholz-Reindl and Reinhold Neuhofer and Alois Schmid and Regine Klinger",
year = "2004",
month = oct,
day = "27",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "455--61",
journal = "CLIN J PAIN",
issn = "0749-8047",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prognosis of multifactorial outcome in lumbar discectomy: a prospective longitudinal study investigating patients with disc prolapse

AU - Kohlboeck, Gabriele

AU - Greimel, Karoline Verena

AU - Piotrowski, Wolfgang Peter

AU - Leibetseder, Max

AU - Krombholz-Reindl, Martin

AU - Neuhofer, Reinhold

AU - Schmid, Alois

AU - Klinger, Regine

PY - 2004/10/27

Y1 - 2004/10/27

N2 - OBJECTIVES: Although previous research has shown that certain medical data and psychosocial factors predict postoperative pain, it remains unclear whether they also contribute to a more distinct outcome measure that is based on classification of self-reported outcome criteria. To assess the prognostic power of somatic, psychologic, and social predictors when evident outcome criteria of surgical treatment are investigated, this study used a prospective longitudinal design examining preoperative factors associated with outcome six months after lumbar discectomy.METHODS: Forty-eight out of 58 consecutive patients were included (60% male, 40% female, mean age 47 years). Preoperative data comprised of Lasegue sign (straight leg raising test), pain duration, paresis and radicular distribution, depression, pain disability, pain coping strategies, and qualitative descriptions of pain. Additionally, sociodemographic and occupational characteristics were observed. Six months' postoperative classification of outcome included pain intensity, pain locations, functional capacity, return to work, and health-related quality of life.RESULTS: From a surgical point of view, lumbar discectomy was successfully carried out on all patients. But, when subjective criteria of outcome were investigated, 56% of patients benefited from lumbar discectomy, whereas 44% of patients had poor results. Lasegue sign, depression, and sensory pain descriptions proved to be significant predictors, whereas pain cognition and pain coping strategies had no significant influence on evident outcome classification.DISCUSSION: Classification of patients regarding their individual outcome profiles showed that patients responded differently to lumbar disc-surgery. High risk factors for poor outcome of surgery are Laseque-sign and depression.

AB - OBJECTIVES: Although previous research has shown that certain medical data and psychosocial factors predict postoperative pain, it remains unclear whether they also contribute to a more distinct outcome measure that is based on classification of self-reported outcome criteria. To assess the prognostic power of somatic, psychologic, and social predictors when evident outcome criteria of surgical treatment are investigated, this study used a prospective longitudinal design examining preoperative factors associated with outcome six months after lumbar discectomy.METHODS: Forty-eight out of 58 consecutive patients were included (60% male, 40% female, mean age 47 years). Preoperative data comprised of Lasegue sign (straight leg raising test), pain duration, paresis and radicular distribution, depression, pain disability, pain coping strategies, and qualitative descriptions of pain. Additionally, sociodemographic and occupational characteristics were observed. Six months' postoperative classification of outcome included pain intensity, pain locations, functional capacity, return to work, and health-related quality of life.RESULTS: From a surgical point of view, lumbar discectomy was successfully carried out on all patients. But, when subjective criteria of outcome were investigated, 56% of patients benefited from lumbar discectomy, whereas 44% of patients had poor results. Lasegue sign, depression, and sensory pain descriptions proved to be significant predictors, whereas pain cognition and pain coping strategies had no significant influence on evident outcome classification.DISCUSSION: Classification of patients regarding their individual outcome profiles showed that patients responded differently to lumbar disc-surgery. High risk factors for poor outcome of surgery are Laseque-sign and depression.

KW - Adult

KW - Aged

KW - Cluster Analysis

KW - Disability Evaluation

KW - Diskectomy

KW - Female

KW - Follow-Up Studies

KW - Health Status Indicators

KW - Humans

KW - Intervertebral Disc Displacement

KW - Low Back Pain

KW - Lumbar Vertebrae

KW - Male

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

KW - Pain Measurement

KW - Predictive Value of Tests

KW - Prognosis

KW - Prospective Studies

KW - Quality of Life

KW - Retrospective Studies

KW - Risk Factors

KW - Clinical Trial

KW - Comparative Study

KW - Journal Article

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 15502690

VL - 20

SP - 455

EP - 461

JO - CLIN J PAIN

JF - CLIN J PAIN

SN - 0749-8047

IS - 6

ER -