Standard
Placing patient-reported outcomes at the centre of cardiovascular clinical practice: implications for quality of care and management : A statement of the ESC Association of Cardiovascular Nursing and Allied Professions (ACNAP), the Association for Acute CardioVascular Care (ACVC), European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI), European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC), Heart Failure Association (HFA), European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI), ESC Regulatory Affairs Committee, ESC Advocacy Committee, ESC Digital Health Committee, ESC Education Committee, and the ESC Patient Forum. / Moons, Philip; Norekvål, Tone M; Arbelo, Elena; Borregaard, Britt; Casadei, Barbara; Cosyns, Bernard; Cowie, Martin R; Fitzsimons, Donna; Fraser, Alan G; Jaarsma, Tiny; Kirchhof, Paulus; Mauri, Josepa; Mindham, Richard; Sanders, Julie; Schiele, Francois; Torbica, Aleksandra; Zwisler, Ann Dorthe.
in:
EUR HEART J, Jahrgang 44, Nr. 36, 21.09.2023, S. 3405-3422.
Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/Zeitung › SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz › Forschung › Begutachtung
Harvard
Moons, P, Norekvål, TM, Arbelo, E, Borregaard, B, Casadei, B, Cosyns, B, Cowie, MR, Fitzsimons, D, Fraser, AG, Jaarsma, T
, Kirchhof, P, Mauri, J, Mindham, R, Sanders, J, Schiele, F, Torbica, A & Zwisler, AD 2023, '
Placing patient-reported outcomes at the centre of cardiovascular clinical practice: implications for quality of care and management: A statement of the ESC Association of Cardiovascular Nursing and Allied Professions (ACNAP), the Association for Acute CardioVascular Care (ACVC), European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI), European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC), Heart Failure Association (HFA), European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI), ESC Regulatory Affairs Committee, ESC Advocacy Committee, ESC Digital Health Committee, ESC Education Committee, and the ESC Patient Forum',
EUR HEART J, Jg. 44, Nr. 36, S. 3405-3422.
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehad514
APA
Moons, P., Norekvål, T. M., Arbelo, E., Borregaard, B., Casadei, B., Cosyns, B., Cowie, M. R., Fitzsimons, D., Fraser, A. G., Jaarsma, T.
, Kirchhof, P., Mauri, J., Mindham, R., Sanders, J., Schiele, F., Torbica, A., & Zwisler, A. D. (2023).
Placing patient-reported outcomes at the centre of cardiovascular clinical practice: implications for quality of care and management: A statement of the ESC Association of Cardiovascular Nursing and Allied Professions (ACNAP), the Association for Acute CardioVascular Care (ACVC), European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI), European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC), Heart Failure Association (HFA), European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI), ESC Regulatory Affairs Committee, ESC Advocacy Committee, ESC Digital Health Committee, ESC Education Committee, and the ESC Patient Forum.
EUR HEART J,
44(36), 3405-3422.
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehad514
Vancouver
Moons P, Norekvål TM, Arbelo E, Borregaard B, Casadei B, Cosyns B et al.
Placing patient-reported outcomes at the centre of cardiovascular clinical practice: implications for quality of care and management: A statement of the ESC Association of Cardiovascular Nursing and Allied Professions (ACNAP), the Association for Acute CardioVascular Care (ACVC), European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI), European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC), Heart Failure Association (HFA), European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI), ESC Regulatory Affairs Committee, ESC Advocacy Committee, ESC Digital Health Committee, ESC Education Committee, and the ESC Patient Forum.
EUR HEART J. 2023 Sep 21;44(36):3405-3422.
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehad514
Bibtex
@article{459b06a05b5d496aa13ac930333c9be7,
title = "Placing patient-reported outcomes at the centre of cardiovascular clinical practice: implications for quality of care and management: A statement of the ESC Association of Cardiovascular Nursing and Allied Professions (ACNAP), the Association for Acute CardioVascular Care (ACVC), European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI), European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC), Heart Failure Association (HFA), European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI), ESC Regulatory Affairs Committee, ESC Advocacy Committee, ESC Digital Health Committee, ESC Education Committee, and the ESC Patient Forum",
abstract = "Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) provide important insights into patients' own perspectives about their health and medical condition, and there is evidence that their use can lead to improvements in the quality of care and to better-informed clinical decisions. Their application in cardiovascular populations has grown over the past decades. This statement describes what PROs are, and it provides an inventory of disease-specific and domain-specific PROs that have been developed for cardiovascular populations. International standards and quality indices have been published, which can guide the selection of PROs for clinical practice and in clinical trials and research; patients as well as experts in psychometrics should be involved in choosing which are most appropriate. Collaborations are needed to define criteria for using PROs to guide regulatory decisions, and the utility of PROs for comparing and monitoring the quality of care and for allocating resources should be evaluated. New sources for recording PROs include wearable digital health devices, medical registries, and electronic health record. Advice is given for the optimal use of PROs in shared clinical decision-making in cardiovascular medicine, and concerning future directions for their wider application.",
keywords = "Humans, Patient Reported Outcome Measures, Quality of Life",
author = "Philip Moons and Norekv{\aa}l, {Tone M} and Elena Arbelo and Britt Borregaard and Barbara Casadei and Bernard Cosyns and Cowie, {Martin R} and Donna Fitzsimons and Fraser, {Alan G} and Tiny Jaarsma and Paulus Kirchhof and Josepa Mauri and Richard Mindham and Julie Sanders and Francois Schiele and Aleksandra Torbica and Zwisler, {Ann Dorthe}",
note = "{\textcopyright} The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.",
year = "2023",
month = sep,
day = "21",
doi = "10.1093/eurheartj/ehad514",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "3405--3422",
journal = "EUR HEART J",
issn = "0195-668X",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "36",
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Placing patient-reported outcomes at the centre of cardiovascular clinical practice: implications for quality of care and management
T2 - A statement of the ESC Association of Cardiovascular Nursing and Allied Professions (ACNAP), the Association for Acute CardioVascular Care (ACVC), European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI), European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC), Heart Failure Association (HFA), European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI), ESC Regulatory Affairs Committee, ESC Advocacy Committee, ESC Digital Health Committee, ESC Education Committee, and the ESC Patient Forum
AU - Moons, Philip
AU - Norekvål, Tone M
AU - Arbelo, Elena
AU - Borregaard, Britt
AU - Casadei, Barbara
AU - Cosyns, Bernard
AU - Cowie, Martin R
AU - Fitzsimons, Donna
AU - Fraser, Alan G
AU - Jaarsma, Tiny
AU - Kirchhof, Paulus
AU - Mauri, Josepa
AU - Mindham, Richard
AU - Sanders, Julie
AU - Schiele, Francois
AU - Torbica, Aleksandra
AU - Zwisler, Ann Dorthe
N1 - © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
PY - 2023/9/21
Y1 - 2023/9/21
N2 - Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) provide important insights into patients' own perspectives about their health and medical condition, and there is evidence that their use can lead to improvements in the quality of care and to better-informed clinical decisions. Their application in cardiovascular populations has grown over the past decades. This statement describes what PROs are, and it provides an inventory of disease-specific and domain-specific PROs that have been developed for cardiovascular populations. International standards and quality indices have been published, which can guide the selection of PROs for clinical practice and in clinical trials and research; patients as well as experts in psychometrics should be involved in choosing which are most appropriate. Collaborations are needed to define criteria for using PROs to guide regulatory decisions, and the utility of PROs for comparing and monitoring the quality of care and for allocating resources should be evaluated. New sources for recording PROs include wearable digital health devices, medical registries, and electronic health record. Advice is given for the optimal use of PROs in shared clinical decision-making in cardiovascular medicine, and concerning future directions for their wider application.
AB - Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) provide important insights into patients' own perspectives about their health and medical condition, and there is evidence that their use can lead to improvements in the quality of care and to better-informed clinical decisions. Their application in cardiovascular populations has grown over the past decades. This statement describes what PROs are, and it provides an inventory of disease-specific and domain-specific PROs that have been developed for cardiovascular populations. International standards and quality indices have been published, which can guide the selection of PROs for clinical practice and in clinical trials and research; patients as well as experts in psychometrics should be involved in choosing which are most appropriate. Collaborations are needed to define criteria for using PROs to guide regulatory decisions, and the utility of PROs for comparing and monitoring the quality of care and for allocating resources should be evaluated. New sources for recording PROs include wearable digital health devices, medical registries, and electronic health record. Advice is given for the optimal use of PROs in shared clinical decision-making in cardiovascular medicine, and concerning future directions for their wider application.
KW - Humans
KW - Patient Reported Outcome Measures
KW - Quality of Life
U2 - 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad514
DO - 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad514
M3 - SCORING: Journal article
C2 - 37606064
VL - 44
SP - 3405
EP - 3422
JO - EUR HEART J
JF - EUR HEART J
SN - 0195-668X
IS - 36
ER -