Impact of Introducing a PACU24 Concept on the Perioperative Outcome of Patients with Advanced Ovarian Cancer Treated with Cytoreductive Surgery

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impact of Introducing a PACU24 Concept on the Perioperative Outcome of Patients with Advanced Ovarian Cancer Treated with Cytoreductive Surgery

AU - Reuter, Susanne

AU - Schmalfeldt, Barbara

AU - Haas, Sebastian A

AU - Zapf, Antonia

AU - Cevirme, Sinan

AU - Prieske, Katharina

AU - Wölber, Linn

AU - Müller, Volkmar

AU - Zöllner, Christian

AU - Jaeger, Anna

N1 - The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

PY - 2023/8

Y1 - 2023/8

N2 - INTRODUCTION: Patients with ovarian cancer who undergo multivisceral surgery usually require intensive care monitoring postoperatively. In view of the ever-fewer numbers of high-care/intensive care beds and the introduction of fast-track treatment concepts, it is increasingly being suggested that these patients should be cared for postoperatively in 24-h Post Anesthesia Care Units (PACU24). No analyses have been carried out to date to investigate whether such a postoperative care concept might be associated with a potential increase in postoperative complications in this patient cohort.METHODS: A PACU24 unit was set up in our institution in 2015 and it has become the primary postoperative care pathway for patients with ovarian cancer who have undergone cytoreductive (debulking) surgery. A structured, retrospective analysis of data from patients treated before (control group) and after (PACU group) the introduction of this care concept was carried out, with a particular focus on postoperative complications and secondary admission to an intensive care unit where necessary.RESULTS: The data of 42 patients were analyzed for the PACU group and 45 patients for the control group. According to the analysis, the preoperative and surgical data of both groups were comparable (age, ASA, BMI, FIGO stage, duration of surgery, blood loss). The Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity (POSSUM score) as a measure for the risk of postoperative complications was higher in the PACU group (11.1% vs. 9.7%, p = 0.001). Patients in the PACU group underwent bowel resection with anastomosis significantly more often (76.3% vs. 33.3%, p < 0.001), although the extent of surgery was otherwise comparable. The total number, type and severity of postoperative complications and the duration of the overall stay in hospital did not differ between the two groups. None of the patients required secondary transfer from the PACU or normal ward to an intensive care unit (ICU).SUMMARY: Our data support the assumption that the care concept of transferring patients to a PACU24 represents a safe and cost-saving care pathway for the postoperative care of patients even after complex gynecological-oncological procedures.

AB - INTRODUCTION: Patients with ovarian cancer who undergo multivisceral surgery usually require intensive care monitoring postoperatively. In view of the ever-fewer numbers of high-care/intensive care beds and the introduction of fast-track treatment concepts, it is increasingly being suggested that these patients should be cared for postoperatively in 24-h Post Anesthesia Care Units (PACU24). No analyses have been carried out to date to investigate whether such a postoperative care concept might be associated with a potential increase in postoperative complications in this patient cohort.METHODS: A PACU24 unit was set up in our institution in 2015 and it has become the primary postoperative care pathway for patients with ovarian cancer who have undergone cytoreductive (debulking) surgery. A structured, retrospective analysis of data from patients treated before (control group) and after (PACU group) the introduction of this care concept was carried out, with a particular focus on postoperative complications and secondary admission to an intensive care unit where necessary.RESULTS: The data of 42 patients were analyzed for the PACU group and 45 patients for the control group. According to the analysis, the preoperative and surgical data of both groups were comparable (age, ASA, BMI, FIGO stage, duration of surgery, blood loss). The Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity (POSSUM score) as a measure for the risk of postoperative complications was higher in the PACU group (11.1% vs. 9.7%, p = 0.001). Patients in the PACU group underwent bowel resection with anastomosis significantly more often (76.3% vs. 33.3%, p < 0.001), although the extent of surgery was otherwise comparable. The total number, type and severity of postoperative complications and the duration of the overall stay in hospital did not differ between the two groups. None of the patients required secondary transfer from the PACU or normal ward to an intensive care unit (ICU).SUMMARY: Our data support the assumption that the care concept of transferring patients to a PACU24 represents a safe and cost-saving care pathway for the postoperative care of patients even after complex gynecological-oncological procedures.

U2 - 10.1055/a-2055-9349

DO - 10.1055/a-2055-9349

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 37588253

VL - 83

SP - 1022

EP - 1030

JO - GEBURTSH FRAUENHEILK

JF - GEBURTSH FRAUENHEILK

SN - 0016-5751

IS - 8

ER -