Gender differences in clinicopathological features and survival in surgically treated patients with renal cell carcinoma

  • Matthias May
  • Atiqullah Aziz
  • Richard Zigeuner
  • Thomas Chromecki
  • Luca Cindolo
  • Luigi Schips
  • Ottavio De Cobelli
  • Bernardo Rocco
  • Cosimo De Nunzio
  • Andrea Tubaro
  • Ioman Coman
  • Michael Truss
  • Orietta Dalpiaz
  • Bernd Hoschke
  • Christian Gilfrich
  • Bogdan Feciche
  • Anette Stoltze
  • Fabian Fenske
  • Hans-Martin Fritsche
  • Robert S Figenshau
  • Kerry Madison
  • Manuel Sánchez-Chapado
  • Maria Del Carmen Santiago Martin
  • Luigi Salzano
  • Giuseppe Lotrecchiano
  • Steven Joniau
  • Raphaela Waidelich
  • Christian Stief
  • Sabine Brookman-May
  • Members of the CORONA Project and the Young Academic Urologists Renal Cancer Group

Beteiligte Einrichtungen

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate gender differences in clinicopathological features and to analyze the prognostic impact of gender in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients undergoing surgery.

METHODS: A total of 6,234 patients (eleven centers; Europe and USA) treated by radical or partial nephrectomy were included in this retrospective study (median follow-up 59 months; IQR 30-106). Gender differences in clinicopathological parameters were assessed. Multivariable Cox regression models were applied to determine the influence of parameters on disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS: A total of 3,751 patients of the study group were male patients (60.2 %), who were significantly younger at diagnosis and received more frequently NSS than women. Significantly, more often high-grade tumors and simultaneous metastasis were present in men. Whereas tumor size and pTN stages did not differ between genders, clear-cell and chromophobe RCC was diagnosed less frequently, but papillary RCC more often in men. Gender also independently influenced DSS (HR 0.75, p < 0.001) and OS (HR 0.80, p < 0.001) with a benefit for women. However, inclusion of gender in multivariable models did not significantly gain predictive accuracies (PA) for DSS (0.868-0.870, p = 0.628) and OS (0.775-0.777, p = 0.522). Furthermore, no significantly different DSS and OS rates were found in patients undergoing NSS.

CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates important gender differences in clinicopathological features and outcome of RCC patients with improved DSS and OS for women compared to men, even if solely patients with clear-cell RCC or M0-stage are taken into evaluation. However, inclusion of gender in multivariable models does not significantly gain PA of multivariable models.

Bibliografische Daten

OriginalspracheEnglisch
ISSN0724-4983
DOIs
StatusVeröffentlicht - 01.10.2013
PubMed 23568445