DSM-5 and ICD-11 definitions of posttraumatic stress disorder: investigating "narrow" and "broad" approaches

Standard

DSM-5 and ICD-11 definitions of posttraumatic stress disorder: investigating "narrow" and "broad" approaches. / Stein, Dan J; McLaughlin, Katie A; Koenen, Karestan C; Atwoli, Lukoye; Friedman, Matthew J; Hill, Eric D; Maercker, Andreas; Petukhova, Maria; Shahly, Victoria; van Ommeren, Mark; Alonso, Jordi; Borges, Guilherme; de Girolamo, Giovanni; de Jonge, Peter; Demyttenaere, Koen; Florescu, Silvia; Karam, Elie G; Kawakami, Norito; Matschinger, Herbert; Okoliyski, Michail; Posada-Villa, Jose; Scott, Kate M; Viana, Maria Carmen; Kessler, Ronald C.

in: DEPRESS ANXIETY, Jahrgang 31, Nr. 6, 01.06.2014, S. 494-505.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

Stein, DJ, McLaughlin, KA, Koenen, KC, Atwoli, L, Friedman, MJ, Hill, ED, Maercker, A, Petukhova, M, Shahly, V, van Ommeren, M, Alonso, J, Borges, G, de Girolamo, G, de Jonge, P, Demyttenaere, K, Florescu, S, Karam, EG, Kawakami, N, Matschinger, H, Okoliyski, M, Posada-Villa, J, Scott, KM, Viana, MC & Kessler, RC 2014, 'DSM-5 and ICD-11 definitions of posttraumatic stress disorder: investigating "narrow" and "broad" approaches', DEPRESS ANXIETY, Jg. 31, Nr. 6, S. 494-505. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.22279

APA

Stein, D. J., McLaughlin, K. A., Koenen, K. C., Atwoli, L., Friedman, M. J., Hill, E. D., Maercker, A., Petukhova, M., Shahly, V., van Ommeren, M., Alonso, J., Borges, G., de Girolamo, G., de Jonge, P., Demyttenaere, K., Florescu, S., Karam, E. G., Kawakami, N., Matschinger, H., ... Kessler, R. C. (2014). DSM-5 and ICD-11 definitions of posttraumatic stress disorder: investigating "narrow" and "broad" approaches. DEPRESS ANXIETY, 31(6), 494-505. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.22279

Vancouver

Stein DJ, McLaughlin KA, Koenen KC, Atwoli L, Friedman MJ, Hill ED et al. DSM-5 and ICD-11 definitions of posttraumatic stress disorder: investigating "narrow" and "broad" approaches. DEPRESS ANXIETY. 2014 Jun 1;31(6):494-505. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.22279

Bibtex

@article{c0154089304748be9dc1cc80f866a733,
title = "DSM-5 and ICD-11 definitions of posttraumatic stress disorder: investigating {"}narrow{"} and {"}broad{"} approaches",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: The development of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 5th edition (DSM-5) and ICD-11 has led to reconsideration of diagnostic criteria for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The World Mental Health (WMH) Surveys allow investigation of the implications of the changing criteria compared to DSM-IV and ICD-10.METHODS: WMH Surveys in 13 countries asked respondents to enumerate all their lifetime traumatic events (TEs) and randomly selected one TE per respondent for PTSD assessment. DSM-IV and ICD-10 PTSD were assessed for the 23,936 respondents who reported lifetime TEs in these surveys with the fully structured Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI). DSM-5 and proposed ICD-11 criteria were approximated. Associations of the different criteria sets with indicators of clinical severity (distress-impairment, suicidality, comorbid fear-distress disorders, PTSD symptom duration) were examined to investigate the implications of using the different systems.RESULTS: A total of 5.6% of respondents met criteria for {"}broadly defined{"} PTSD (i.e., full criteria in at least one diagnostic system), with prevalence ranging from 3.0% with DSM-5 to 4.4% with ICD-10. Only one-third of broadly defined cases met criteria in all four systems and another one third in only one system (narrowly defined cases). Between-system differences in indicators of clinical severity suggest that ICD-10 criteria are least strict and DSM-IV criteria most strict. The more striking result, though, is that significantly elevated indicators of clinical significance were found even for narrowly defined cases for each of the four diagnostic systems.CONCLUSIONS: These results argue for a broad definition of PTSD defined by any one of the different systems to capture all clinically significant cases of PTSD in future studies.",
keywords = "Americas, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Europe, Global Health, Humans, International Classification of Diseases, Japan, Life Change Events, New Zealand, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic",
author = "Stein, {Dan J} and McLaughlin, {Katie A} and Koenen, {Karestan C} and Lukoye Atwoli and Friedman, {Matthew J} and Hill, {Eric D} and Andreas Maercker and Maria Petukhova and Victoria Shahly and {van Ommeren}, Mark and Jordi Alonso and Guilherme Borges and {de Girolamo}, Giovanni and {de Jonge}, Peter and Koen Demyttenaere and Silvia Florescu and Karam, {Elie G} and Norito Kawakami and Herbert Matschinger and Michail Okoliyski and Jose Posada-Villa and Scott, {Kate M} and Viana, {Maria Carmen} and Kessler, {Ronald C}",
note = "{\textcopyright} 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.",
year = "2014",
month = jun,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/da.22279",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "494--505",
journal = "DEPRESS ANXIETY",
issn = "1091-4269",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - DSM-5 and ICD-11 definitions of posttraumatic stress disorder: investigating "narrow" and "broad" approaches

AU - Stein, Dan J

AU - McLaughlin, Katie A

AU - Koenen, Karestan C

AU - Atwoli, Lukoye

AU - Friedman, Matthew J

AU - Hill, Eric D

AU - Maercker, Andreas

AU - Petukhova, Maria

AU - Shahly, Victoria

AU - van Ommeren, Mark

AU - Alonso, Jordi

AU - Borges, Guilherme

AU - de Girolamo, Giovanni

AU - de Jonge, Peter

AU - Demyttenaere, Koen

AU - Florescu, Silvia

AU - Karam, Elie G

AU - Kawakami, Norito

AU - Matschinger, Herbert

AU - Okoliyski, Michail

AU - Posada-Villa, Jose

AU - Scott, Kate M

AU - Viana, Maria Carmen

AU - Kessler, Ronald C

N1 - © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

PY - 2014/6/1

Y1 - 2014/6/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: The development of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 5th edition (DSM-5) and ICD-11 has led to reconsideration of diagnostic criteria for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The World Mental Health (WMH) Surveys allow investigation of the implications of the changing criteria compared to DSM-IV and ICD-10.METHODS: WMH Surveys in 13 countries asked respondents to enumerate all their lifetime traumatic events (TEs) and randomly selected one TE per respondent for PTSD assessment. DSM-IV and ICD-10 PTSD were assessed for the 23,936 respondents who reported lifetime TEs in these surveys with the fully structured Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI). DSM-5 and proposed ICD-11 criteria were approximated. Associations of the different criteria sets with indicators of clinical severity (distress-impairment, suicidality, comorbid fear-distress disorders, PTSD symptom duration) were examined to investigate the implications of using the different systems.RESULTS: A total of 5.6% of respondents met criteria for "broadly defined" PTSD (i.e., full criteria in at least one diagnostic system), with prevalence ranging from 3.0% with DSM-5 to 4.4% with ICD-10. Only one-third of broadly defined cases met criteria in all four systems and another one third in only one system (narrowly defined cases). Between-system differences in indicators of clinical severity suggest that ICD-10 criteria are least strict and DSM-IV criteria most strict. The more striking result, though, is that significantly elevated indicators of clinical significance were found even for narrowly defined cases for each of the four diagnostic systems.CONCLUSIONS: These results argue for a broad definition of PTSD defined by any one of the different systems to capture all clinically significant cases of PTSD in future studies.

AB - BACKGROUND: The development of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 5th edition (DSM-5) and ICD-11 has led to reconsideration of diagnostic criteria for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The World Mental Health (WMH) Surveys allow investigation of the implications of the changing criteria compared to DSM-IV and ICD-10.METHODS: WMH Surveys in 13 countries asked respondents to enumerate all their lifetime traumatic events (TEs) and randomly selected one TE per respondent for PTSD assessment. DSM-IV and ICD-10 PTSD were assessed for the 23,936 respondents who reported lifetime TEs in these surveys with the fully structured Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI). DSM-5 and proposed ICD-11 criteria were approximated. Associations of the different criteria sets with indicators of clinical severity (distress-impairment, suicidality, comorbid fear-distress disorders, PTSD symptom duration) were examined to investigate the implications of using the different systems.RESULTS: A total of 5.6% of respondents met criteria for "broadly defined" PTSD (i.e., full criteria in at least one diagnostic system), with prevalence ranging from 3.0% with DSM-5 to 4.4% with ICD-10. Only one-third of broadly defined cases met criteria in all four systems and another one third in only one system (narrowly defined cases). Between-system differences in indicators of clinical severity suggest that ICD-10 criteria are least strict and DSM-IV criteria most strict. The more striking result, though, is that significantly elevated indicators of clinical significance were found even for narrowly defined cases for each of the four diagnostic systems.CONCLUSIONS: These results argue for a broad definition of PTSD defined by any one of the different systems to capture all clinically significant cases of PTSD in future studies.

KW - Americas

KW - Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

KW - Europe

KW - Global Health

KW - Humans

KW - International Classification of Diseases

KW - Japan

KW - Life Change Events

KW - New Zealand

KW - Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic

U2 - 10.1002/da.22279

DO - 10.1002/da.22279

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 24894802

VL - 31

SP - 494

EP - 505

JO - DEPRESS ANXIETY

JF - DEPRESS ANXIETY

SN - 1091-4269

IS - 6

ER -