Development of a short version of the Neck Pain and Disability Scale

Standard

Development of a short version of the Neck Pain and Disability Scale. / Blozik, Eva; Kochen, Michael M; Herrmann-Lingen, Christoph; Scherer, Martin.

in: EUR J PAIN, Jahrgang 14, Nr. 8, 09.2010, S. 864.e1-7.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{f893c25c4944491689d6b0cca4f57bfa,
title = "Development of a short version of the Neck Pain and Disability Scale",
abstract = "Previous evaluations of the 20-item Neck Pain and Disability Scale (NPAD) were indicative of excessive redundancy of the measure. The aim of this study was to develop a shortened version of the NPAD (sf-NPAD) based on results of item-to-total-score correlations and factor analysis as published by the developers of the original NPAD. Two items with the highest item-to-total score correlation were selected per factor subscale with the exception of one factor consisting of only one item. This resulted in the selection of 9 items for the sf-NPAD. The sf-NPAD was validated in a separate sample of 448 neck pain patients from 15 general practices in the area of G{\"o}ttingen/Germany. Participants completed the 20-item NPAD German version and gave additional sociodemographic and clinical information. Psychometric properties of the sf-NPAD were evaluated using Cronbach's alpha, item-to-total-score correlation, and unrestricted principal factor analysis. Construct validity was evaluated by Pearson's r with clinical characteristics. Discriminative validity was examined by comparing differences between subgroups stratified by psychosocial characteristics using t-tests for mean scores. Cronbach's alpha of the sf-NPAD was 0.88. Item-to-total-scale correlations ranged between 0.628 and 0.815, and sf-NPAD items homogeneously loaded on a single factor. Correlation analysis showed high correlations with criterion variables. The sf-NPAD scores of patient subgroups were significantly different showing good discriminative validity. In conclusion, the sf-NPAD demonstrated good validity and internal consistency in this general practice setting. The abbreviated version may facilitate applicability of the scale in clinical and research settings.",
keywords = "Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Disability Evaluation, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neck Pain, Pain Measurement, Psychometrics, Reproducibility of Results, Surveys and Questionnaires",
author = "Eva Blozik and Kochen, {Michael M} and Christoph Herrmann-Lingen and Martin Scherer",
note = "Copyright 2010 European Federation of International Association for the Study of Pain Chapters. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.",
year = "2010",
month = sep,
doi = "10.1016/j.ejpain.2009.12.006",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "864.e1--7",
journal = "EUR J PAIN",
issn = "1090-3801",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "8",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Development of a short version of the Neck Pain and Disability Scale

AU - Blozik, Eva

AU - Kochen, Michael M

AU - Herrmann-Lingen, Christoph

AU - Scherer, Martin

N1 - Copyright 2010 European Federation of International Association for the Study of Pain Chapters. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

PY - 2010/9

Y1 - 2010/9

N2 - Previous evaluations of the 20-item Neck Pain and Disability Scale (NPAD) were indicative of excessive redundancy of the measure. The aim of this study was to develop a shortened version of the NPAD (sf-NPAD) based on results of item-to-total-score correlations and factor analysis as published by the developers of the original NPAD. Two items with the highest item-to-total score correlation were selected per factor subscale with the exception of one factor consisting of only one item. This resulted in the selection of 9 items for the sf-NPAD. The sf-NPAD was validated in a separate sample of 448 neck pain patients from 15 general practices in the area of Göttingen/Germany. Participants completed the 20-item NPAD German version and gave additional sociodemographic and clinical information. Psychometric properties of the sf-NPAD were evaluated using Cronbach's alpha, item-to-total-score correlation, and unrestricted principal factor analysis. Construct validity was evaluated by Pearson's r with clinical characteristics. Discriminative validity was examined by comparing differences between subgroups stratified by psychosocial characteristics using t-tests for mean scores. Cronbach's alpha of the sf-NPAD was 0.88. Item-to-total-scale correlations ranged between 0.628 and 0.815, and sf-NPAD items homogeneously loaded on a single factor. Correlation analysis showed high correlations with criterion variables. The sf-NPAD scores of patient subgroups were significantly different showing good discriminative validity. In conclusion, the sf-NPAD demonstrated good validity and internal consistency in this general practice setting. The abbreviated version may facilitate applicability of the scale in clinical and research settings.

AB - Previous evaluations of the 20-item Neck Pain and Disability Scale (NPAD) were indicative of excessive redundancy of the measure. The aim of this study was to develop a shortened version of the NPAD (sf-NPAD) based on results of item-to-total-score correlations and factor analysis as published by the developers of the original NPAD. Two items with the highest item-to-total score correlation were selected per factor subscale with the exception of one factor consisting of only one item. This resulted in the selection of 9 items for the sf-NPAD. The sf-NPAD was validated in a separate sample of 448 neck pain patients from 15 general practices in the area of Göttingen/Germany. Participants completed the 20-item NPAD German version and gave additional sociodemographic and clinical information. Psychometric properties of the sf-NPAD were evaluated using Cronbach's alpha, item-to-total-score correlation, and unrestricted principal factor analysis. Construct validity was evaluated by Pearson's r with clinical characteristics. Discriminative validity was examined by comparing differences between subgroups stratified by psychosocial characteristics using t-tests for mean scores. Cronbach's alpha of the sf-NPAD was 0.88. Item-to-total-scale correlations ranged between 0.628 and 0.815, and sf-NPAD items homogeneously loaded on a single factor. Correlation analysis showed high correlations with criterion variables. The sf-NPAD scores of patient subgroups were significantly different showing good discriminative validity. In conclusion, the sf-NPAD demonstrated good validity and internal consistency in this general practice setting. The abbreviated version may facilitate applicability of the scale in clinical and research settings.

KW - Adult

KW - Aged

KW - Aged, 80 and over

KW - Disability Evaluation

KW - Factor Analysis, Statistical

KW - Female

KW - Humans

KW - Male

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Neck Pain

KW - Pain Measurement

KW - Psychometrics

KW - Reproducibility of Results

KW - Surveys and Questionnaires

U2 - 10.1016/j.ejpain.2009.12.006

DO - 10.1016/j.ejpain.2009.12.006

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 20096613

VL - 14

SP - 864.e1-7

JO - EUR J PAIN

JF - EUR J PAIN

SN - 1090-3801

IS - 8

ER -