Current Imaging Strategies in Patients with Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

TY - JOUR

T1 - Current Imaging Strategies in Patients with Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

AU - Ristow, Inka

AU - Riedel, Christoph

AU - Lenz, Alexander

AU - Well, Lennart

AU - Adam, Gerhard

AU - Panuccio, Giuseppe

AU - Kölbel, Tilo

AU - Bannas, Peter

N1 - Thieme. All rights reserved.

PY - 2024/1

Y1 - 2024/1

N2 - BACKGROUND:  An abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is defined as a localized dilatation of the abdominal aorta of ≥ 3 cm. With a prevalence of 4-8 %, AAA is one of the most common vascular diseases in Western society. Radiological imaging is an elementary component in the diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment planning of AAA patients.METHOD:  This is a narrative review article on preoperative imaging strategies of AAA, incorporating expert opinions based on the current literature and standard-of-care practices from our own center. Examples are provided to illustrate clinical cases from our institution.RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:  Radiological imaging plays a pivotal role in the initial diagnosis and monitoring of patients with AAA. Ultrasound is the mainstay imaging modality for AAA screening and surveillance. Contrast-enhanced CT angiography is currently considered the gold standard for preoperative imaging and image-based treatment planning in AAA repair. New non-contrast MR angiography techniques are robustly applicable and allow precise determination of aortic diameters, which is of critical importance, particularly with regard to current diameter-based surgical treatment guidelines. 3D imaging with multiplanar reformation and automatic centerline positioning enables more accurate assessment of the maximum aortic diameter. Modern imaging techniques such as 4D flow MRI have the potential to further improve individualized risk stratification in patients with AAA.KEY POINTS:   · Ultrasound is the mainstay imaging modality for AAA screening and monitoring. · Contrast-enhanced CT angiography is the gold standard for preoperative imaging in AAA repair. · Non-contrast MR angiography allows for accurate monitoring of aortic diameters in AAA patients. · Measurement of aortic diameters is more accurate with 3D-CT/MRI compared to ultrasound. · Research seeks new quantitative imaging biomarkers for AAA risk stratification, e. g., using 4D flow MRI.

AB - BACKGROUND:  An abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is defined as a localized dilatation of the abdominal aorta of ≥ 3 cm. With a prevalence of 4-8 %, AAA is one of the most common vascular diseases in Western society. Radiological imaging is an elementary component in the diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment planning of AAA patients.METHOD:  This is a narrative review article on preoperative imaging strategies of AAA, incorporating expert opinions based on the current literature and standard-of-care practices from our own center. Examples are provided to illustrate clinical cases from our institution.RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:  Radiological imaging plays a pivotal role in the initial diagnosis and monitoring of patients with AAA. Ultrasound is the mainstay imaging modality for AAA screening and surveillance. Contrast-enhanced CT angiography is currently considered the gold standard for preoperative imaging and image-based treatment planning in AAA repair. New non-contrast MR angiography techniques are robustly applicable and allow precise determination of aortic diameters, which is of critical importance, particularly with regard to current diameter-based surgical treatment guidelines. 3D imaging with multiplanar reformation and automatic centerline positioning enables more accurate assessment of the maximum aortic diameter. Modern imaging techniques such as 4D flow MRI have the potential to further improve individualized risk stratification in patients with AAA.KEY POINTS:   · Ultrasound is the mainstay imaging modality for AAA screening and monitoring. · Contrast-enhanced CT angiography is the gold standard for preoperative imaging in AAA repair. · Non-contrast MR angiography allows for accurate monitoring of aortic diameters in AAA patients. · Measurement of aortic diameters is more accurate with 3D-CT/MRI compared to ultrasound. · Research seeks new quantitative imaging biomarkers for AAA risk stratification, e. g., using 4D flow MRI.

U2 - 10.1055/a-2119-6448

DO - 10.1055/a-2119-6448

M3 - SCORING: Review article

C2 - 37699431

VL - 196

SP - 52

EP - 61

JO - ROFO-FORTSCHR RONTG

JF - ROFO-FORTSCHR RONTG

SN - 1438-9029

IS - 1

ER -