Compatibility of scientific research and specialty training in general practice. A cross-sectional study

Standard

Compatibility of scientific research and specialty training in general practice. A cross-sectional study. / Kötter, Thomas; Carmienke, Solveig; Herrmann, Wolfram J.

in: GMS Z Med Ausbild, Jahrgang 31, Nr. 3, 01.01.2014, S. Doc31.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{3cf20c4785564436b1c2122406405766,
title = "Compatibility of scientific research and specialty training in general practice. A cross-sectional study",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: In many departments of General Practice (GP) in Germany, young doctors who are trainees also work as researchers. Often these trainees work part time at the university and part time as a trainee in clinical practice. However, little is known about the situation of the actors involved. The aim of the study was to investigate the perspectives of GP trainees, heads of departments and GP trainers regarding the combination of research and GP training.METHODS: We conducted a web-based survey with the heads of all German departments of General Practice, GP trainees who also conduct research and their GP trainers. The questionnaires consisted of open and closed questions. The results were analyzed using descriptive statistics and qualitative methods.RESULTS: 28 heads of GP departments and 20 GP trainees responded. The trainees were mostly very satisfied with their situation as a trainee. However, the trainees considered the combination of research and GP training as difficult. The respondents name as problems the coordination of multiple jobs and the lack of credibility given to research in General Practice. They name as solutions research-enabling training programs and uniform requirements in training regarding research.CONCLUSION: The combination of GP training and scientific research activity is perceived as difficult. However, well-organized and designed programs can improve the quality of the combination.",
author = "Thomas K{\"o}tter and Solveig Carmienke and Herrmann, {Wolfram J}",
year = "2014",
month = jan,
day = "1",
doi = "10.3205/zma000923",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "Doc31",
journal = "GMS J MED EDU",
issn = "2366-5017",
publisher = "German Medical Science",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Compatibility of scientific research and specialty training in general practice. A cross-sectional study

AU - Kötter, Thomas

AU - Carmienke, Solveig

AU - Herrmann, Wolfram J

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - OBJECTIVE: In many departments of General Practice (GP) in Germany, young doctors who are trainees also work as researchers. Often these trainees work part time at the university and part time as a trainee in clinical practice. However, little is known about the situation of the actors involved. The aim of the study was to investigate the perspectives of GP trainees, heads of departments and GP trainers regarding the combination of research and GP training.METHODS: We conducted a web-based survey with the heads of all German departments of General Practice, GP trainees who also conduct research and their GP trainers. The questionnaires consisted of open and closed questions. The results were analyzed using descriptive statistics and qualitative methods.RESULTS: 28 heads of GP departments and 20 GP trainees responded. The trainees were mostly very satisfied with their situation as a trainee. However, the trainees considered the combination of research and GP training as difficult. The respondents name as problems the coordination of multiple jobs and the lack of credibility given to research in General Practice. They name as solutions research-enabling training programs and uniform requirements in training regarding research.CONCLUSION: The combination of GP training and scientific research activity is perceived as difficult. However, well-organized and designed programs can improve the quality of the combination.

AB - OBJECTIVE: In many departments of General Practice (GP) in Germany, young doctors who are trainees also work as researchers. Often these trainees work part time at the university and part time as a trainee in clinical practice. However, little is known about the situation of the actors involved. The aim of the study was to investigate the perspectives of GP trainees, heads of departments and GP trainers regarding the combination of research and GP training.METHODS: We conducted a web-based survey with the heads of all German departments of General Practice, GP trainees who also conduct research and their GP trainers. The questionnaires consisted of open and closed questions. The results were analyzed using descriptive statistics and qualitative methods.RESULTS: 28 heads of GP departments and 20 GP trainees responded. The trainees were mostly very satisfied with their situation as a trainee. However, the trainees considered the combination of research and GP training as difficult. The respondents name as problems the coordination of multiple jobs and the lack of credibility given to research in General Practice. They name as solutions research-enabling training programs and uniform requirements in training regarding research.CONCLUSION: The combination of GP training and scientific research activity is perceived as difficult. However, well-organized and designed programs can improve the quality of the combination.

U2 - 10.3205/zma000923

DO - 10.3205/zma000923

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 25228933

VL - 31

SP - Doc31

JO - GMS J MED EDU

JF - GMS J MED EDU

SN - 2366-5017

IS - 3

ER -