Comparison of three different serum-free light-chain assays-implications on diagnostic and therapeutic monitoring of multiple myeloma

Standard

Comparison of three different serum-free light-chain assays-implications on diagnostic and therapeutic monitoring of multiple myeloma. / Schieferdecker, Aneta; Hörber, Sebastian; Ums, Monika; Besemer, Britta; Bokemeyer, Carsten; Peter, Andreas; Weisel, Katja.

in: BLOOD CANCER J, Jahrgang 10, Nr. 1, 09.01.2020, S. 2.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{61d4bcbb949c45ffb85141053180d939,
title = "Comparison of three different serum-free light-chain assays-implications on diagnostic and therapeutic monitoring of multiple myeloma",
abstract = "The measurement of serum-free light chains (FLC) is standard of care in the diagnosis and management of multiple myeloma (MM). The revised international myeloma working group (IMWG) implemented the involved FLC/noninvolved FLC (iFLC/niFLC) ratio as a biomarker for MM requiring treatment. Recently, a new definition of high-risk smoldering MM (SMM) including iFLC/niFLC ratio was published. These recommendations were solely based on a single assay method (Freelite assay). Today, two additional assays, N Latex FLC and ELISA-based Sebia FLC, are available. Here, we report on a single-center-study comparing results of all three different assays for FLC correlation and its potential implications for diagnostic and clinical use. In total, 187 samples from 47 MM patients were examined, and determination of FLC was performed. Comparison analyses showed similar FLC results for Sebia FLC and N Latex FLC assay with markedly lower absolute values for κ/λ ratio compared with Freelite. Values of λ FLC exhibited high variability. The ratio of iFLC/niFLC showed significant discrepancies among these assays. Our data demonstrate that the three available assays may result in markedly discrepant results, and should not be used interchangeably to monitor patients. Furthermore, modifications of the assay-specific diagnostic (iFLC/niFLC) thresholds for SMM and MM are recommended.",
author = "Aneta Schieferdecker and Sebastian H{\"o}rber and Monika Ums and Britta Besemer and Carsten Bokemeyer and Andreas Peter and Katja Weisel",
year = "2020",
month = jan,
day = "9",
doi = "10.1038/s41408-019-0267-8",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "2",
journal = "BLOOD CANCER J",
issn = "2044-5385",
publisher = "NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of three different serum-free light-chain assays-implications on diagnostic and therapeutic monitoring of multiple myeloma

AU - Schieferdecker, Aneta

AU - Hörber, Sebastian

AU - Ums, Monika

AU - Besemer, Britta

AU - Bokemeyer, Carsten

AU - Peter, Andreas

AU - Weisel, Katja

PY - 2020/1/9

Y1 - 2020/1/9

N2 - The measurement of serum-free light chains (FLC) is standard of care in the diagnosis and management of multiple myeloma (MM). The revised international myeloma working group (IMWG) implemented the involved FLC/noninvolved FLC (iFLC/niFLC) ratio as a biomarker for MM requiring treatment. Recently, a new definition of high-risk smoldering MM (SMM) including iFLC/niFLC ratio was published. These recommendations were solely based on a single assay method (Freelite assay). Today, two additional assays, N Latex FLC and ELISA-based Sebia FLC, are available. Here, we report on a single-center-study comparing results of all three different assays for FLC correlation and its potential implications for diagnostic and clinical use. In total, 187 samples from 47 MM patients were examined, and determination of FLC was performed. Comparison analyses showed similar FLC results for Sebia FLC and N Latex FLC assay with markedly lower absolute values for κ/λ ratio compared with Freelite. Values of λ FLC exhibited high variability. The ratio of iFLC/niFLC showed significant discrepancies among these assays. Our data demonstrate that the three available assays may result in markedly discrepant results, and should not be used interchangeably to monitor patients. Furthermore, modifications of the assay-specific diagnostic (iFLC/niFLC) thresholds for SMM and MM are recommended.

AB - The measurement of serum-free light chains (FLC) is standard of care in the diagnosis and management of multiple myeloma (MM). The revised international myeloma working group (IMWG) implemented the involved FLC/noninvolved FLC (iFLC/niFLC) ratio as a biomarker for MM requiring treatment. Recently, a new definition of high-risk smoldering MM (SMM) including iFLC/niFLC ratio was published. These recommendations were solely based on a single assay method (Freelite assay). Today, two additional assays, N Latex FLC and ELISA-based Sebia FLC, are available. Here, we report on a single-center-study comparing results of all three different assays for FLC correlation and its potential implications for diagnostic and clinical use. In total, 187 samples from 47 MM patients were examined, and determination of FLC was performed. Comparison analyses showed similar FLC results for Sebia FLC and N Latex FLC assay with markedly lower absolute values for κ/λ ratio compared with Freelite. Values of λ FLC exhibited high variability. The ratio of iFLC/niFLC showed significant discrepancies among these assays. Our data demonstrate that the three available assays may result in markedly discrepant results, and should not be used interchangeably to monitor patients. Furthermore, modifications of the assay-specific diagnostic (iFLC/niFLC) thresholds for SMM and MM are recommended.

U2 - 10.1038/s41408-019-0267-8

DO - 10.1038/s41408-019-0267-8

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 31915365

VL - 10

SP - 2

JO - BLOOD CANCER J

JF - BLOOD CANCER J

SN - 2044-5385

IS - 1

ER -