Comparison of Cytomegalovirus-Specific Immune Cell Response to Proteins versus Peptides Using an IFN-γ ELISpot Assay after Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

  • Eva Wagner-Drouet
  • Daniel Teschner
  • Christine Wolschke
  • Kerstin Schäfer-Eckart
  • Johannes Gärtner
  • Stephan Mielke
  • Martin Schreder
  • Guido Kobbe
  • Inken Hilgendorf
  • Stefan Klein
  • Mareike Verbeek
  • Markus Ditschkowski
  • Martina Koch
  • Monika Lindemann
  • Traudel Schmidt
  • Anne Rascle
  • Sascha Barabas
  • Ludwig Deml
  • Ralf Wagner
  • Daniel Wolff

Abstract

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a major cause of morbidity and mortality following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Measuring CMV-specific cellular immunity may improve the risk stratification and management of patients. IFN-γ ELISpot assays, based on the stimulation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells with CMV pp65 and IE-1 proteins or peptides, have been validated in clinical settings. However, it remains unclear to which extend the T-cell response to synthetic peptides reflect that mediated by full-length proteins processed by antigen-presenting cells. We compared the stimulating ability of pp65 and IE-1 proteins and corresponding overlapping peptides in 16 HSCT recipients using a standardized IFN-γ ELISpot assay. Paired qualitative test results showed an overall 74.4% concordance. Discordant results were mainly due to low-response tests, with one exception. One patient with early CMV reactivation and graft-versus-host disease, sustained CMV DNAemia and high CD8+ counts showed successive negative protein-based ELISpot results but a high and sustained response to IE-1 peptides. Our results suggest that the response to exogenous proteins, which involves their uptake and processing by antigen-presenting cells, more closely reflects the physiological response to CMV infection, while the response to exogenous peptides may lead to artificial in vitro T-cell responses, especially in strongly immunosuppressed patients.

Bibliografische Daten

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Aufsatznummer312
ISSN2075-4418
DOIs
StatusVeröffentlicht - 15.02.2021
PubMed 33671952