Assessment of medical students' shared decision-making skills in simulated physician-patient encounters

Standard

Assessment of medical students' shared decision-making skills in simulated physician-patient encounters. / Waschwill, Alexander; Bittner, Anja; Harendza, Sigrid.

in: PATIENT EDUC COUNS, Jahrgang 103, Nr. 3, 03.2020, S. 500-504.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{ce5a00b87ab84d58b824f3edfc3846a6,
title = "Assessment of medical students' shared decision-making skills in simulated physician-patient encounters",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To compare shared decision-making skills of medical students who voluntarily translate medical documents into plain language with students who do not participate in this voluntary task.METHODS: 29 medical students who voluntarily translated medical documents for patients into plain language on the online-platform https://washabich.de (WHI group) and 29 medical students who did not (non-WHI group) participated in a simulated virtual consultation hour. Via skype, participants communicated with six simulated patients. All conversations were transcribed and a blinded rater assessed them with the OPTION scale for shared decision-making.RESULTS: The WHI group received significantly (p < .001) higher total scores for shared decision-making with the OPTION scale than the non-WHI group. The greatest differences in scores were found for the items {"}The clinician checks that the patient has understood the information.{"} (WHI: 2.98 ± 0.77 vs. non-WHI: 2.61 ± 0.89, p < .001) and {"}The clinician offers the patient explicit opportunities to ask questions during the decision-making process.{"} (WHI: 2.83 ± 1.00 vs. non-WHI: 2.40 ± 1.07, p < .001).CONCLUSION: Written translation of medical documents is associated with significantly better OPTION scores for shared decision-making in simulated physician-patient encounters.PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: To use written medial translation exercises in general to improve medical students' shared decision-making skills.",
author = "Alexander Waschwill and Anja Bittner and Sigrid Harendza",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.",
year = "2020",
month = mar,
doi = "10.1016/j.pec.2019.09.013",
language = "English",
volume = "103",
pages = "500--504",
journal = "PATIENT EDUC COUNS",
issn = "0738-3991",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessment of medical students' shared decision-making skills in simulated physician-patient encounters

AU - Waschwill, Alexander

AU - Bittner, Anja

AU - Harendza, Sigrid

N1 - Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

PY - 2020/3

Y1 - 2020/3

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To compare shared decision-making skills of medical students who voluntarily translate medical documents into plain language with students who do not participate in this voluntary task.METHODS: 29 medical students who voluntarily translated medical documents for patients into plain language on the online-platform https://washabich.de (WHI group) and 29 medical students who did not (non-WHI group) participated in a simulated virtual consultation hour. Via skype, participants communicated with six simulated patients. All conversations were transcribed and a blinded rater assessed them with the OPTION scale for shared decision-making.RESULTS: The WHI group received significantly (p < .001) higher total scores for shared decision-making with the OPTION scale than the non-WHI group. The greatest differences in scores were found for the items "The clinician checks that the patient has understood the information." (WHI: 2.98 ± 0.77 vs. non-WHI: 2.61 ± 0.89, p < .001) and "The clinician offers the patient explicit opportunities to ask questions during the decision-making process." (WHI: 2.83 ± 1.00 vs. non-WHI: 2.40 ± 1.07, p < .001).CONCLUSION: Written translation of medical documents is associated with significantly better OPTION scores for shared decision-making in simulated physician-patient encounters.PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: To use written medial translation exercises in general to improve medical students' shared decision-making skills.

AB - OBJECTIVE: To compare shared decision-making skills of medical students who voluntarily translate medical documents into plain language with students who do not participate in this voluntary task.METHODS: 29 medical students who voluntarily translated medical documents for patients into plain language on the online-platform https://washabich.de (WHI group) and 29 medical students who did not (non-WHI group) participated in a simulated virtual consultation hour. Via skype, participants communicated with six simulated patients. All conversations were transcribed and a blinded rater assessed them with the OPTION scale for shared decision-making.RESULTS: The WHI group received significantly (p < .001) higher total scores for shared decision-making with the OPTION scale than the non-WHI group. The greatest differences in scores were found for the items "The clinician checks that the patient has understood the information." (WHI: 2.98 ± 0.77 vs. non-WHI: 2.61 ± 0.89, p < .001) and "The clinician offers the patient explicit opportunities to ask questions during the decision-making process." (WHI: 2.83 ± 1.00 vs. non-WHI: 2.40 ± 1.07, p < .001).CONCLUSION: Written translation of medical documents is associated with significantly better OPTION scores for shared decision-making in simulated physician-patient encounters.PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: To use written medial translation exercises in general to improve medical students' shared decision-making skills.

U2 - 10.1016/j.pec.2019.09.013

DO - 10.1016/j.pec.2019.09.013

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 31543355

VL - 103

SP - 500

EP - 504

JO - PATIENT EDUC COUNS

JF - PATIENT EDUC COUNS

SN - 0738-3991

IS - 3

ER -