Worldwide use of intrauterine contraception

Standard

Worldwide use of intrauterine contraception. / Buhling, Kai J; Zite, Nikki B; Lotke, Pamela; Black, Kirsten; INTRA Writing Group.

In: CONTRACEPTION, Vol. 89, No. 3, 01.03.2014, p. 162-173.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Buhling, KJ, Zite, NB, Lotke, P, Black, K & INTRA Writing Group 2014, 'Worldwide use of intrauterine contraception', CONTRACEPTION, vol. 89, no. 3, pp. 162-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2013.11.011

APA

Buhling, K. J., Zite, N. B., Lotke, P., Black, K., & INTRA Writing Group (2014). Worldwide use of intrauterine contraception. CONTRACEPTION, 89(3), 162-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2013.11.011

Vancouver

Buhling KJ, Zite NB, Lotke P, Black K, INTRA Writing Group. Worldwide use of intrauterine contraception. CONTRACEPTION. 2014 Mar 1;89(3):162-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2013.11.011

Bibtex

@article{191ebe97dac440e5bb68279a68e58fbe,
title = "Worldwide use of intrauterine contraception",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Globally, 14.3% of women of reproductive age use intrauterine contraception (IUC), but the distribution of IUC users is strikingly nonuniform. In some countries, the percentage of women using IUC is <2%, whereas in other countries, it is >40%. Reasons for this large variation are not well documented. The aims of this review are to describe the worldwide variation in IUC utilization and to explore factors that impact utilization rates among women of reproductive age in different continents and countries.STUDY DESIGN: Published literature from 1982 to 2012 was reviewed, using Medline and Embase, to identify publications reporting diverse practices of IUC provision, including variation in the types of IUC available. Local experts who are active members of international advisory groups or congresses were also consulted to document variations in practice regulations, published guidelines and cost of IUC in different countries.RESULTS: Multiple factors appear to contribute to global variability in IUC use, including government policy on family planning, the types of health care providers (HCPs) who are authorized to place and remove IUC, the medicolegal environment, the availability of practical training for HCPs, cost differences and the geographical spread of clinics providing IUC services.CONCLUSIONS: Our review shows that the use of IUC is influenced more by factors such as geographic differences, government policy and the HCP's educational level than by medical eligibility criteria. These factors can be influenced through education of HCPs and greater understanding among policy makers of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of IUC methods.IMPLICATIONS: Globally, 14.3% of women of reproductive age use IUC, but the percentage of women using IUC is in some countries <2%, whereas in other countries, it is >40%. This paper reviews the reasons for this diverse and highlights possible starting points to improve the inclusion of IUC in contraceptive counseling.",
keywords = "Cost-Benefit Analysis, Counseling, Culture, Family Planning Services, Female, Government, Gynecology, Health Personnel, Health Policy, Humans, Intrauterine Devices, MEDLINE, Religion",
author = "Buhling, {Kai J} and Zite, {Nikki B} and Pamela Lotke and Kirsten Black and {INTRA Writing Group}",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.",
year = "2014",
month = mar,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.contraception.2013.11.011",
language = "English",
volume = "89",
pages = "162--173",
journal = "CONTRACEPTION",
issn = "0010-7824",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Worldwide use of intrauterine contraception

AU - Buhling, Kai J

AU - Zite, Nikki B

AU - Lotke, Pamela

AU - Black, Kirsten

AU - INTRA Writing Group

N1 - Copyright © 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

PY - 2014/3/1

Y1 - 2014/3/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: Globally, 14.3% of women of reproductive age use intrauterine contraception (IUC), but the distribution of IUC users is strikingly nonuniform. In some countries, the percentage of women using IUC is <2%, whereas in other countries, it is >40%. Reasons for this large variation are not well documented. The aims of this review are to describe the worldwide variation in IUC utilization and to explore factors that impact utilization rates among women of reproductive age in different continents and countries.STUDY DESIGN: Published literature from 1982 to 2012 was reviewed, using Medline and Embase, to identify publications reporting diverse practices of IUC provision, including variation in the types of IUC available. Local experts who are active members of international advisory groups or congresses were also consulted to document variations in practice regulations, published guidelines and cost of IUC in different countries.RESULTS: Multiple factors appear to contribute to global variability in IUC use, including government policy on family planning, the types of health care providers (HCPs) who are authorized to place and remove IUC, the medicolegal environment, the availability of practical training for HCPs, cost differences and the geographical spread of clinics providing IUC services.CONCLUSIONS: Our review shows that the use of IUC is influenced more by factors such as geographic differences, government policy and the HCP's educational level than by medical eligibility criteria. These factors can be influenced through education of HCPs and greater understanding among policy makers of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of IUC methods.IMPLICATIONS: Globally, 14.3% of women of reproductive age use IUC, but the percentage of women using IUC is in some countries <2%, whereas in other countries, it is >40%. This paper reviews the reasons for this diverse and highlights possible starting points to improve the inclusion of IUC in contraceptive counseling.

AB - BACKGROUND: Globally, 14.3% of women of reproductive age use intrauterine contraception (IUC), but the distribution of IUC users is strikingly nonuniform. In some countries, the percentage of women using IUC is <2%, whereas in other countries, it is >40%. Reasons for this large variation are not well documented. The aims of this review are to describe the worldwide variation in IUC utilization and to explore factors that impact utilization rates among women of reproductive age in different continents and countries.STUDY DESIGN: Published literature from 1982 to 2012 was reviewed, using Medline and Embase, to identify publications reporting diverse practices of IUC provision, including variation in the types of IUC available. Local experts who are active members of international advisory groups or congresses were also consulted to document variations in practice regulations, published guidelines and cost of IUC in different countries.RESULTS: Multiple factors appear to contribute to global variability in IUC use, including government policy on family planning, the types of health care providers (HCPs) who are authorized to place and remove IUC, the medicolegal environment, the availability of practical training for HCPs, cost differences and the geographical spread of clinics providing IUC services.CONCLUSIONS: Our review shows that the use of IUC is influenced more by factors such as geographic differences, government policy and the HCP's educational level than by medical eligibility criteria. These factors can be influenced through education of HCPs and greater understanding among policy makers of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of IUC methods.IMPLICATIONS: Globally, 14.3% of women of reproductive age use IUC, but the percentage of women using IUC is in some countries <2%, whereas in other countries, it is >40%. This paper reviews the reasons for this diverse and highlights possible starting points to improve the inclusion of IUC in contraceptive counseling.

KW - Cost-Benefit Analysis

KW - Counseling

KW - Culture

KW - Family Planning Services

KW - Female

KW - Government

KW - Gynecology

KW - Health Personnel

KW - Health Policy

KW - Humans

KW - Intrauterine Devices

KW - MEDLINE

KW - Religion

U2 - 10.1016/j.contraception.2013.11.011

DO - 10.1016/j.contraception.2013.11.011

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 24369300

VL - 89

SP - 162

EP - 173

JO - CONTRACEPTION

JF - CONTRACEPTION

SN - 0010-7824

IS - 3

ER -