Which Matters More in Incidental Category Learning: Edge-Based Versus Surface-Based Features

Standard

Which Matters More in Incidental Category Learning: Edge-Based Versus Surface-Based Features. / Zhou, Xiaoyan; Fu, Qiufang; Rose, Michael; Sun, Yuqi.

In: FRONT PSYCHOL, Vol. 10, 2019, p. 183.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{40e9b0daf1e2459993b76828f3f98500,
title = "Which Matters More in Incidental Category Learning: Edge-Based Versus Surface-Based Features",
abstract = "Although many researches have shown that edge-based information is more important than surface-based information in object recognition, it remains unclear whether edge-based features play a more crucial role than surface-based features in category learning. To address this issue, a modified prototype distortion task was adopted in the present study, in which each category was defined by a rule or a similarity about either the edge-based features (i.e., contours or shapes) or the corresponding surface-based features (i.e., color and textures). The results of Experiments 1 and 2 showed that when the category was defined by a rule, the performance was significantly better in the edge-based condition than in the surface-based condition in the testing phase, and increasing the defined dimensions enhanced rather than reduced performance in the edge-based condition but not in the surface-based condition. The results of Experiment 3 showed that when each category was defined by a similarity, there was also a larger learning effect when the category was defined by edge-based dimensions than by surface-based dimensions in the testing phase. The current study is the first to provide convergent evidence that the edge-based information matters more than surface-based information in incidental category learning.",
keywords = "Journal Article",
author = "Xiaoyan Zhou and Qiufang Fu and Michael Rose and Yuqi Sun",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00183",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "183",
journal = "FRONT PSYCHOL",
issn = "1664-1078",
publisher = "Frontiers Research Foundation",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Which Matters More in Incidental Category Learning: Edge-Based Versus Surface-Based Features

AU - Zhou, Xiaoyan

AU - Fu, Qiufang

AU - Rose, Michael

AU - Sun, Yuqi

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Although many researches have shown that edge-based information is more important than surface-based information in object recognition, it remains unclear whether edge-based features play a more crucial role than surface-based features in category learning. To address this issue, a modified prototype distortion task was adopted in the present study, in which each category was defined by a rule or a similarity about either the edge-based features (i.e., contours or shapes) or the corresponding surface-based features (i.e., color and textures). The results of Experiments 1 and 2 showed that when the category was defined by a rule, the performance was significantly better in the edge-based condition than in the surface-based condition in the testing phase, and increasing the defined dimensions enhanced rather than reduced performance in the edge-based condition but not in the surface-based condition. The results of Experiment 3 showed that when each category was defined by a similarity, there was also a larger learning effect when the category was defined by edge-based dimensions than by surface-based dimensions in the testing phase. The current study is the first to provide convergent evidence that the edge-based information matters more than surface-based information in incidental category learning.

AB - Although many researches have shown that edge-based information is more important than surface-based information in object recognition, it remains unclear whether edge-based features play a more crucial role than surface-based features in category learning. To address this issue, a modified prototype distortion task was adopted in the present study, in which each category was defined by a rule or a similarity about either the edge-based features (i.e., contours or shapes) or the corresponding surface-based features (i.e., color and textures). The results of Experiments 1 and 2 showed that when the category was defined by a rule, the performance was significantly better in the edge-based condition than in the surface-based condition in the testing phase, and increasing the defined dimensions enhanced rather than reduced performance in the edge-based condition but not in the surface-based condition. The results of Experiment 3 showed that when each category was defined by a similarity, there was also a larger learning effect when the category was defined by edge-based dimensions than by surface-based dimensions in the testing phase. The current study is the first to provide convergent evidence that the edge-based information matters more than surface-based information in incidental category learning.

KW - Journal Article

U2 - 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00183

DO - 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00183

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 30792675

VL - 10

SP - 183

JO - FRONT PSYCHOL

JF - FRONT PSYCHOL

SN - 1664-1078

ER -