Research ExplorerPublicationsWas sind übertragungsdeutungen und wie wirken sie?

Was sind übertragungsdeutungen und wie wirken sie?

Standard

Was sind übertragungsdeutungen und wie wirken sie? Eine systematische übersicht. / Brumberg, Joachim; Gumz, Antje.

In: Z PSYCHOSOM MED PSYC, Vol. 58, No. 3, 01.01.2012, p. 219-35.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journal › SCORING: Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Brumberg, J & Gumz, A 2012, 'Was sind übertragungsdeutungen und wie wirken sie? Eine systematische übersicht', Z PSYCHOSOM MED PSYC, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 219-35. https://doi.org/10.13109/zptm.2012.58.3.219

APA

Brumberg, J., & Gumz, A. (2012). Was sind übertragungsdeutungen und wie wirken sie? Eine systematische übersicht. Z PSYCHOSOM MED PSYC, 58(3), 219-35. https://doi.org/10.13109/zptm.2012.58.3.219

Vancouver

Brumberg J, Gumz A. Was sind übertragungsdeutungen und wie wirken sie? Eine systematische übersicht. Z PSYCHOSOM MED PSYC. 2012 Jan 1;58(3):219-35. https://doi.org/10.13109/zptm.2012.58.3.219

Bibtex

@article{b62e6de611364603a77c18115b35e465,
title = "Was sind {\"u}bertragungsdeutungen und wie wirken sie?: Eine systematische {\"u}bersicht",
abstract = "In clinical theory transference interpretations represent a central therapeutic technique and a specific mechanism of change in psychodynamic psychotherapies. However, the empirical basis lags behind the theoretical considerations. This article reviews both the results of empirical research on transference interpretations and their definitions of the measures employed (systematic database search for the timespan 1970-2011). The empirical results are rather heterogeneous and in part contradictory. As it turns out, specific patient characteristics (e.g., the quality of object relations), the amount and quality of transference interpretations as well as the patients' immediate reaction all decisively influence the potency of the change of transference interpretations. Currently, it is not possible to develop clear therapeutic strategies based on previous findings. Careful use of transference interpretations is generally recommended. Various methods for measuring transference interpretations exist, but the definitions do not correspond completely. A standardization of definitions would increase the comparability and interpretability of findings and greatly improve concordance with theory.",
keywords = "Humans, Object Attachment, Physician-Patient Relations, Psychoanalytic Interpretation, Psychoanalytic Theory, Psychoanalytic Therapy, Transference (Psychology)",
author = "Joachim Brumberg and Antje Gumz",
year = "2012",
month = jan,
day = "1",
doi = "10.13109/zptm.2012.58.3.219",
language = "Deutsch",
volume = "58",
pages = "219--35",
journal = "Z PSYCHOSOM MED PSYC",
issn = "1438-3608",
publisher = "Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht GmbH and Co. KG",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Was sind übertragungsdeutungen und wie wirken sie?

T2 - Eine systematische übersicht

AU - Brumberg, Joachim

AU - Gumz, Antje

PY - 2012/1/1

Y1 - 2012/1/1

N2 - In clinical theory transference interpretations represent a central therapeutic technique and a specific mechanism of change in psychodynamic psychotherapies. However, the empirical basis lags behind the theoretical considerations. This article reviews both the results of empirical research on transference interpretations and their definitions of the measures employed (systematic database search for the timespan 1970-2011). The empirical results are rather heterogeneous and in part contradictory. As it turns out, specific patient characteristics (e.g., the quality of object relations), the amount and quality of transference interpretations as well as the patients' immediate reaction all decisively influence the potency of the change of transference interpretations. Currently, it is not possible to develop clear therapeutic strategies based on previous findings. Careful use of transference interpretations is generally recommended. Various methods for measuring transference interpretations exist, but the definitions do not correspond completely. A standardization of definitions would increase the comparability and interpretability of findings and greatly improve concordance with theory.

AB - In clinical theory transference interpretations represent a central therapeutic technique and a specific mechanism of change in psychodynamic psychotherapies. However, the empirical basis lags behind the theoretical considerations. This article reviews both the results of empirical research on transference interpretations and their definitions of the measures employed (systematic database search for the timespan 1970-2011). The empirical results are rather heterogeneous and in part contradictory. As it turns out, specific patient characteristics (e.g., the quality of object relations), the amount and quality of transference interpretations as well as the patients' immediate reaction all decisively influence the potency of the change of transference interpretations. Currently, it is not possible to develop clear therapeutic strategies based on previous findings. Careful use of transference interpretations is generally recommended. Various methods for measuring transference interpretations exist, but the definitions do not correspond completely. A standardization of definitions would increase the comparability and interpretability of findings and greatly improve concordance with theory.

KW - Humans

KW - Object Attachment

KW - Physician-Patient Relations

KW - Psychoanalytic Interpretation

KW - Psychoanalytic Theory

KW - Psychoanalytic Therapy

KW - Transference (Psychology)

U2 - 10.13109/zptm.2012.58.3.219

DO - 10.13109/zptm.2012.58.3.219

M3 - SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz

C2 - 22987490

VL - 58

SP - 219

EP - 235

JO - Z PSYCHOSOM MED PSYC

JF - Z PSYCHOSOM MED PSYC

SN - 1438-3608

IS - 3

ER -