Validation of the Spanish version of the 9-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire

Standard

Validation of the Spanish version of the 9-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire. / De Las Cuevas, Carlos; Perestelo-Perez, Lilisbeth; Rivero-Santana, Amado; Cebolla-Martí, Ausiàs; Scholl, Isabelle; Härter, Martin.

In: HEALTH EXPECT, Vol. 18, No. 6, 2015, p. 2143-2153.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

De Las Cuevas, C, Perestelo-Perez, L, Rivero-Santana, A, Cebolla-Martí, A, Scholl, I & Härter, M 2015, 'Validation of the Spanish version of the 9-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire', HEALTH EXPECT, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 2143-2153. https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.12183

APA

De Las Cuevas, C., Perestelo-Perez, L., Rivero-Santana, A., Cebolla-Martí, A., Scholl, I., & Härter, M. (2015). Validation of the Spanish version of the 9-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire. HEALTH EXPECT, 18(6), 2143-2153. https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.12183

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{ea5f9f763a2841628951f83e05f9e1fc,
title = "Validation of the Spanish version of the 9-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To translate and assess the psychometric properties of the 9-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) for measuring patients' perceptions of how clinicians' performance fits the SDM process.DESIGN: Cross-sectional study.SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Data were collected in primary care health centres. Patients suffering from chronic diseases and facing a medical decision were included in the study.MEASUREMENTS: The original German SDM-Q-9 was translated to Spanish using the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-reported measures as the methodological model for Spanish translation. Reliability (internal consistency) and construct validity [exploratory (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA)] were assessed.RESULTS: The final Spanish version of the SDM-Q-9 was tested in a primary care sample of 540 patients. The SDM-Q-9 presented adequate reliability and acceptable validity. Internal consistency yielded a Cronbach's alpha of 0.885 for the whole scale. EFA showed a two-factorial solution, and for the CFA, the best solution was obtained with a one-dimensional factor with the item 1 excluded, which produced the best indexes of fit.DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The Spanish version of the SDM-Q-9 showed adequate reliability and acceptable validity parameters among primary care patients. The SDM-Q-9 is suitable for use in Spain and other Spanish-speaking countries with similarly organized health-care systems. The use of the SDM-Q-9 may contribute to the evaluation of SDM process from the patient's perspective.",
author = "{De Las Cuevas}, Carlos and Lilisbeth Perestelo-Perez and Amado Rivero-Santana and Ausi{\`a}s Cebolla-Mart{\'i} and Isabelle Scholl and Martin H{\"a}rter",
note = "06/2015: Epub ahead of print",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1111/hex.12183",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "2143--2153",
journal = "HEALTH EXPECT",
issn = "1369-6513",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Validation of the Spanish version of the 9-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire

AU - De Las Cuevas, Carlos

AU - Perestelo-Perez, Lilisbeth

AU - Rivero-Santana, Amado

AU - Cebolla-Martí, Ausiàs

AU - Scholl, Isabelle

AU - Härter, Martin

N1 - 06/2015: Epub ahead of print

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To translate and assess the psychometric properties of the 9-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) for measuring patients' perceptions of how clinicians' performance fits the SDM process.DESIGN: Cross-sectional study.SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Data were collected in primary care health centres. Patients suffering from chronic diseases and facing a medical decision were included in the study.MEASUREMENTS: The original German SDM-Q-9 was translated to Spanish using the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-reported measures as the methodological model for Spanish translation. Reliability (internal consistency) and construct validity [exploratory (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA)] were assessed.RESULTS: The final Spanish version of the SDM-Q-9 was tested in a primary care sample of 540 patients. The SDM-Q-9 presented adequate reliability and acceptable validity. Internal consistency yielded a Cronbach's alpha of 0.885 for the whole scale. EFA showed a two-factorial solution, and for the CFA, the best solution was obtained with a one-dimensional factor with the item 1 excluded, which produced the best indexes of fit.DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The Spanish version of the SDM-Q-9 showed adequate reliability and acceptable validity parameters among primary care patients. The SDM-Q-9 is suitable for use in Spain and other Spanish-speaking countries with similarly organized health-care systems. The use of the SDM-Q-9 may contribute to the evaluation of SDM process from the patient's perspective.

AB - OBJECTIVE: To translate and assess the psychometric properties of the 9-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) for measuring patients' perceptions of how clinicians' performance fits the SDM process.DESIGN: Cross-sectional study.SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Data were collected in primary care health centres. Patients suffering from chronic diseases and facing a medical decision were included in the study.MEASUREMENTS: The original German SDM-Q-9 was translated to Spanish using the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-reported measures as the methodological model for Spanish translation. Reliability (internal consistency) and construct validity [exploratory (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA)] were assessed.RESULTS: The final Spanish version of the SDM-Q-9 was tested in a primary care sample of 540 patients. The SDM-Q-9 presented adequate reliability and acceptable validity. Internal consistency yielded a Cronbach's alpha of 0.885 for the whole scale. EFA showed a two-factorial solution, and for the CFA, the best solution was obtained with a one-dimensional factor with the item 1 excluded, which produced the best indexes of fit.DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The Spanish version of the SDM-Q-9 showed adequate reliability and acceptable validity parameters among primary care patients. The SDM-Q-9 is suitable for use in Spain and other Spanish-speaking countries with similarly organized health-care systems. The use of the SDM-Q-9 may contribute to the evaluation of SDM process from the patient's perspective.

U2 - 10.1111/hex.12183

DO - 10.1111/hex.12183

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 24593044

VL - 18

SP - 2143

EP - 2153

JO - HEALTH EXPECT

JF - HEALTH EXPECT

SN - 1369-6513

IS - 6

ER -