Utility of Amino Acid PET in the Differential Diagnosis of Recurrent Brain Metastases and Treatment-Related Changes: a meta-analysis

Standard

Utility of Amino Acid PET in the Differential Diagnosis of Recurrent Brain Metastases and Treatment-Related Changes: a meta-analysis. / Schlürmann, Timo; Waschulzik, Birgit; Combs, Stephanie; Gempt, Jens; Wiestler, Benedikt; Weber, Wolfgang; Yakushev, Igor.

In: J NUCL MED, Vol. 64, No. 5, 05.2023, p. 816-821.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{6348b72cb4d3468586d351190853253d,
title = "Utility of Amino Acid PET in the Differential Diagnosis of Recurrent Brain Metastases and Treatment-Related Changes: a meta-analysis",
abstract = "Amino acid PET is an established method to assist differential diagnosis of therapy-related changes versus recurrence in gliomas. However, its diagnostic value in brain metastases is yet to be determined. The goal of this study was to summarize evidence on the diagnostic utility of amino acid PET in recurrent brain metastases. Methods: The medical databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were screened for English-language studies with at least 10 patients who had undergone first-line treatment including radiotherapy and in whom a final diagnosis had been determined by histologic examination or imaging and clinical follow-up. Pooled estimates with 95% CIs were calculated. Heterogeneity was assessed using I2 statistics. Results: Following the above criteria, 12 studies with the tracers methyl-[11C]-methionine (n = 6), O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-l-tyrosine (n = 3), methyl-[11C]-methionine and O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-l-tyrosine (n = 1), and 6-[18F]fluoro-L-dopa (n = 2), with a total of 547 lesions in 397 patients, were included. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were 82% (95% CI, 76-86) and 84% (95% CI, 79-88), respectively. Pooled positive and negative predictive values were 84% (95% CI, 77-90) and 83% (95% CI, 77-88), respectively. Positive and negative likelihood ratios, and diagnostic odds ratio were 3.8 (95% CI 3.0-4.8), 0.3 (95% CI 0.2-0.3), and 16.7 (95% CI 10.8-25.9), respectively. Heterogeneity was overall low. Conclusion: The present meta-analysis indicates a good accuracy of amino acid PET in the differential diagnosis of recurrent brain metastases. In particular, specificity of 84% suggests that amino acid PET may reduce the number of invasive procedures and overtreatment in patients with treatment-related changes. This study provides class IIa evidence on the utility of amino acid PET in the differential diagnosis of recurrent brain metastases.",
author = "Timo Schl{\"u}rmann and Birgit Waschulzik and Stephanie Combs and Jens Gempt and Benedikt Wiestler and Wolfgang Weber and Igor Yakushev",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2022 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Inc.",
year = "2023",
month = may,
doi = "10.2967/jnumed.122.264803",
language = "English",
volume = "64",
pages = "816--821",
journal = "J NUCL MED",
issn = "0161-5505",
publisher = "Society of Nuclear Medicine Inc.",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Utility of Amino Acid PET in the Differential Diagnosis of Recurrent Brain Metastases and Treatment-Related Changes: a meta-analysis

AU - Schlürmann, Timo

AU - Waschulzik, Birgit

AU - Combs, Stephanie

AU - Gempt, Jens

AU - Wiestler, Benedikt

AU - Weber, Wolfgang

AU - Yakushev, Igor

N1 - Copyright © 2022 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Inc.

PY - 2023/5

Y1 - 2023/5

N2 - Amino acid PET is an established method to assist differential diagnosis of therapy-related changes versus recurrence in gliomas. However, its diagnostic value in brain metastases is yet to be determined. The goal of this study was to summarize evidence on the diagnostic utility of amino acid PET in recurrent brain metastases. Methods: The medical databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were screened for English-language studies with at least 10 patients who had undergone first-line treatment including radiotherapy and in whom a final diagnosis had been determined by histologic examination or imaging and clinical follow-up. Pooled estimates with 95% CIs were calculated. Heterogeneity was assessed using I2 statistics. Results: Following the above criteria, 12 studies with the tracers methyl-[11C]-methionine (n = 6), O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-l-tyrosine (n = 3), methyl-[11C]-methionine and O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-l-tyrosine (n = 1), and 6-[18F]fluoro-L-dopa (n = 2), with a total of 547 lesions in 397 patients, were included. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were 82% (95% CI, 76-86) and 84% (95% CI, 79-88), respectively. Pooled positive and negative predictive values were 84% (95% CI, 77-90) and 83% (95% CI, 77-88), respectively. Positive and negative likelihood ratios, and diagnostic odds ratio were 3.8 (95% CI 3.0-4.8), 0.3 (95% CI 0.2-0.3), and 16.7 (95% CI 10.8-25.9), respectively. Heterogeneity was overall low. Conclusion: The present meta-analysis indicates a good accuracy of amino acid PET in the differential diagnosis of recurrent brain metastases. In particular, specificity of 84% suggests that amino acid PET may reduce the number of invasive procedures and overtreatment in patients with treatment-related changes. This study provides class IIa evidence on the utility of amino acid PET in the differential diagnosis of recurrent brain metastases.

AB - Amino acid PET is an established method to assist differential diagnosis of therapy-related changes versus recurrence in gliomas. However, its diagnostic value in brain metastases is yet to be determined. The goal of this study was to summarize evidence on the diagnostic utility of amino acid PET in recurrent brain metastases. Methods: The medical databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were screened for English-language studies with at least 10 patients who had undergone first-line treatment including radiotherapy and in whom a final diagnosis had been determined by histologic examination or imaging and clinical follow-up. Pooled estimates with 95% CIs were calculated. Heterogeneity was assessed using I2 statistics. Results: Following the above criteria, 12 studies with the tracers methyl-[11C]-methionine (n = 6), O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-l-tyrosine (n = 3), methyl-[11C]-methionine and O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-l-tyrosine (n = 1), and 6-[18F]fluoro-L-dopa (n = 2), with a total of 547 lesions in 397 patients, were included. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were 82% (95% CI, 76-86) and 84% (95% CI, 79-88), respectively. Pooled positive and negative predictive values were 84% (95% CI, 77-90) and 83% (95% CI, 77-88), respectively. Positive and negative likelihood ratios, and diagnostic odds ratio were 3.8 (95% CI 3.0-4.8), 0.3 (95% CI 0.2-0.3), and 16.7 (95% CI 10.8-25.9), respectively. Heterogeneity was overall low. Conclusion: The present meta-analysis indicates a good accuracy of amino acid PET in the differential diagnosis of recurrent brain metastases. In particular, specificity of 84% suggests that amino acid PET may reduce the number of invasive procedures and overtreatment in patients with treatment-related changes. This study provides class IIa evidence on the utility of amino acid PET in the differential diagnosis of recurrent brain metastases.

U2 - 10.2967/jnumed.122.264803

DO - 10.2967/jnumed.122.264803

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 36460343

VL - 64

SP - 816

EP - 821

JO - J NUCL MED

JF - J NUCL MED

SN - 0161-5505

IS - 5

ER -