Using the patient's perspective to develop function short forms specific to total hip and knee replacement based on WOMAC function items

Standard

Using the patient's perspective to develop function short forms specific to total hip and knee replacement based on WOMAC function items. / Liebs, T R; Herzberg, W; Gluth, J; Ruether, Wolfgang; Haasters, J; Russlies, M; Hassenpflug, J.

In: BONE JOINT J, Vol. 95-B, No. 2, 01.02.2013, p. 239-43.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Liebs, TR, Herzberg, W, Gluth, J, Ruether, W, Haasters, J, Russlies, M & Hassenpflug, J 2013, 'Using the patient's perspective to develop function short forms specific to total hip and knee replacement based on WOMAC function items', BONE JOINT J, vol. 95-B, no. 2, pp. 239-43. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.95B2.28383

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{ebbda839924f4748b613dc62bc08b82d,
title = "Using the patient's perspective to develop function short forms specific to total hip and knee replacement based on WOMAC function items",
abstract = "Although the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) osteoarthritis index was originally developed for the assessment of non-operative treatment, it is commonly used to evaluate patients undergoing either total hip (THR) or total knee replacement (TKR). We assessed the importance of the 17 WOMAC function items from the perspective of 1198 patients who underwent either THR (n = 704) or TKR (n = 494) in order to develop joint-specific short forms. After these patients were administered the WOMAC pre-operatively and at three, six, 12 and 24 months' follow-up, they were asked to nominate an item of the function scale that was most important to them. The items chosen were significantly different between patients undergoing THR and those undergoing TKR (p < 0.001), and there was a shift in the priorities after surgery in both groups. Setting a threshold for prioritised items of ≥ 5% across all follow-up, eight items were selected for THR and seven for TKR, of which six items were common to both. The items comprising specific WOMAC-THR and TKR function short forms were found to be equally responsive compared with the original WOMAC function form.",
keywords = "Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip, Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Health Priorities, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Multicenter Studies as Topic, Ontario, Osteoarthritis, Hip, Osteoarthritis, Knee, Prospective Studies, Questionnaires, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Severity of Illness Index, Treatment Outcome",
author = "Liebs, {T R} and W Herzberg and J Gluth and Wolfgang Ruether and J Haasters and M Russlies and J Hassenpflug",
year = "2013",
month = feb,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1302/0301-620X.95B2.28383",
language = "English",
volume = "95-B",
pages = "239--43",
journal = "BONE JOINT J",
issn = "2049-4394",
publisher = "British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Using the patient's perspective to develop function short forms specific to total hip and knee replacement based on WOMAC function items

AU - Liebs, T R

AU - Herzberg, W

AU - Gluth, J

AU - Ruether, Wolfgang

AU - Haasters, J

AU - Russlies, M

AU - Hassenpflug, J

PY - 2013/2/1

Y1 - 2013/2/1

N2 - Although the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) osteoarthritis index was originally developed for the assessment of non-operative treatment, it is commonly used to evaluate patients undergoing either total hip (THR) or total knee replacement (TKR). We assessed the importance of the 17 WOMAC function items from the perspective of 1198 patients who underwent either THR (n = 704) or TKR (n = 494) in order to develop joint-specific short forms. After these patients were administered the WOMAC pre-operatively and at three, six, 12 and 24 months' follow-up, they were asked to nominate an item of the function scale that was most important to them. The items chosen were significantly different between patients undergoing THR and those undergoing TKR (p < 0.001), and there was a shift in the priorities after surgery in both groups. Setting a threshold for prioritised items of ≥ 5% across all follow-up, eight items were selected for THR and seven for TKR, of which six items were common to both. The items comprising specific WOMAC-THR and TKR function short forms were found to be equally responsive compared with the original WOMAC function form.

AB - Although the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) osteoarthritis index was originally developed for the assessment of non-operative treatment, it is commonly used to evaluate patients undergoing either total hip (THR) or total knee replacement (TKR). We assessed the importance of the 17 WOMAC function items from the perspective of 1198 patients who underwent either THR (n = 704) or TKR (n = 494) in order to develop joint-specific short forms. After these patients were administered the WOMAC pre-operatively and at three, six, 12 and 24 months' follow-up, they were asked to nominate an item of the function scale that was most important to them. The items chosen were significantly different between patients undergoing THR and those undergoing TKR (p < 0.001), and there was a shift in the priorities after surgery in both groups. Setting a threshold for prioritised items of ≥ 5% across all follow-up, eight items were selected for THR and seven for TKR, of which six items were common to both. The items comprising specific WOMAC-THR and TKR function short forms were found to be equally responsive compared with the original WOMAC function form.

KW - Aged

KW - Aged, 80 and over

KW - Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip

KW - Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee

KW - Female

KW - Follow-Up Studies

KW - Health Priorities

KW - Humans

KW - Male

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Multicenter Studies as Topic

KW - Ontario

KW - Osteoarthritis, Hip

KW - Osteoarthritis, Knee

KW - Prospective Studies

KW - Questionnaires

KW - Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

KW - Severity of Illness Index

KW - Treatment Outcome

U2 - 10.1302/0301-620X.95B2.28383

DO - 10.1302/0301-620X.95B2.28383

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 23365035

VL - 95-B

SP - 239

EP - 243

JO - BONE JOINT J

JF - BONE JOINT J

SN - 2049-4394

IS - 2

ER -