Uninterrupted anticoagulation with non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation catheter ablation: Lessons learned from randomized trials
Standard
Uninterrupted anticoagulation with non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation catheter ablation: Lessons learned from randomized trials. / Cardoso, Rhanderson; Willems, Stephan; Gerstenfeld, Edward P; Verma, Atul; Schilling, Richard; Hohnloser, Stefan H; Okumura, Ken; Nordaby, Matias; Brouwer, Marc A; Calkins, Hugh.
In: CLIN CARDIOL, Vol. 42, No. 1, 01.2019, p. 198-205.Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journal › SCORING: Review article › Research
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Uninterrupted anticoagulation with non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation catheter ablation: Lessons learned from randomized trials
AU - Cardoso, Rhanderson
AU - Willems, Stephan
AU - Gerstenfeld, Edward P
AU - Verma, Atul
AU - Schilling, Richard
AU - Hohnloser, Stefan H
AU - Okumura, Ken
AU - Nordaby, Matias
AU - Brouwer, Marc A
AU - Calkins, Hugh
N1 - © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
PY - 2019/1
Y1 - 2019/1
N2 - Catheter ablation has been established as a rhythm control strategy in selected patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who have failed or wish to avoid anti-arrhythmic drugs. Uninterrupted oral anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) peri-ablation is associated with a lower risk of thromboembolic and bleeding complications as compared to interrupted oral anticoagulation and bridging heparin. However, a substantial portion of patients with AF are treated with non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs). Herein, we perform an in-depth review and comparison of three recent randomized trials of uninterrupted oral anticoagulation with NOACs vs VKAs in patients undergoing AF catheter ablation. Furthermore, we report pooled results of these randomized trials. The pooled incidence of major bleeding was significantly lower with NOACs as compared to VKAs (2% vs 4.9%, respectively; odds ratio [OR] 0.40; 95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.16-0.99). Similarly, cardiac tamponade was also reduced in the NOAC group (0.4% vs 1.5%; OR 0.27; 95% CI 0.07-0.97). Thromboembolic complications were not significantly different between groups. Overall, these findings support the 2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement's class I recommendation for uninterrupted NOAC use in patients undergoing AF catheter ablation.
AB - Catheter ablation has been established as a rhythm control strategy in selected patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who have failed or wish to avoid anti-arrhythmic drugs. Uninterrupted oral anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) peri-ablation is associated with a lower risk of thromboembolic and bleeding complications as compared to interrupted oral anticoagulation and bridging heparin. However, a substantial portion of patients with AF are treated with non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs). Herein, we perform an in-depth review and comparison of three recent randomized trials of uninterrupted oral anticoagulation with NOACs vs VKAs in patients undergoing AF catheter ablation. Furthermore, we report pooled results of these randomized trials. The pooled incidence of major bleeding was significantly lower with NOACs as compared to VKAs (2% vs 4.9%, respectively; odds ratio [OR] 0.40; 95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.16-0.99). Similarly, cardiac tamponade was also reduced in the NOAC group (0.4% vs 1.5%; OR 0.27; 95% CI 0.07-0.97). Thromboembolic complications were not significantly different between groups. Overall, these findings support the 2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement's class I recommendation for uninterrupted NOAC use in patients undergoing AF catheter ablation.
KW - Administration, Oral
KW - Anticoagulants/administration & dosage
KW - Atrial Fibrillation/complications
KW - Catheter Ablation/methods
KW - Humans
KW - Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
KW - Thromboembolism/etiology
KW - Vitamin K/antagonists & inhibitors
U2 - 10.1002/clc.23120
DO - 10.1002/clc.23120
M3 - SCORING: Review article
C2 - 30460702
VL - 42
SP - 198
EP - 205
JO - CLIN CARDIOL
JF - CLIN CARDIOL
SN - 0160-9289
IS - 1
ER -