Understanding how the motivational dimension of learning is influenced by clinical teaching in medical education: A prospective cohort study

Standard

Understanding how the motivational dimension of learning is influenced by clinical teaching in medical education: A prospective cohort study. / Moll-Khosrawi, Parisa; Cronje, Jonathan Steven; Zöllner, Christian; Kubitz, Jens Christian; Schulte-Uentrop, Leonie.

In: ANN MED SURG, Vol. 65, 102366, 05.2021.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{f5c4378a4de744d08c374902b4dcdc44,
title = "Understanding how the motivational dimension of learning is influenced by clinical teaching in medical education: A prospective cohort study",
abstract = "Introduction: Many changes of medical curricula have been conducted in the past years. Based on learning psychology, three dimensions of learning have to be covered, in order to create the best possible curricula: Cognitive, metacognitive and motivational. The metacognitive and cognitive dimension (what/how to teach) have always been considered and the motivational dimension has been neglected, although the importance and benefits of motivation in learning have been emphasized repeatedly. One way to influence motivation in medical curricula are the teaching formats, as it has been shown that the construction of a curriculum can influence students' motivation. So far, evidence about the motivational effects of teaching formats are scarce.Methods: In a prospective interventional cohort study, 145 3rd year medical students were sampled. The effects of a 3-day bedside teaching in the operating theatre and two simulation-based trainings on students' motivation (outcome measure) were analysed. It was hypothesized, that the simulation training and the bedside teaching enhance autonomous motivation and decrease controlled motivation.Results: The bedside-teaching decreased external (controlled) motivation (-0.14, p = .013, 95% CI [-0.24, -0.03]), alongside with identified (autonomous) motivation (-0.22, p < .001, 95% CI [-0.34, -0.10]). The simulation-based trainings did not change students' motivation.Conclusion: To prevent the unintended decrease of identified (autonomous) motivation, undergraduates should be supervised and introduced carefully, when attending bedside teaching in unknown medical fields. Simulation-based medical education certainly has plenty of benefits in medical education but its effects on the motivational dimension of learning needs further investigations.",
author = "Parisa Moll-Khosrawi and Cronje, {Jonathan Steven} and Christian Z{\"o}llner and Kubitz, {Jens Christian} and Leonie Schulte-Uentrop",
note = "{\textcopyright} 2021 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of IJS Publishing Group Ltd.",
year = "2021",
month = may,
doi = "10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102366",
language = "English",
volume = "65",
journal = "ANN MED SURG",
issn = "2049-0801",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Understanding how the motivational dimension of learning is influenced by clinical teaching in medical education: A prospective cohort study

AU - Moll-Khosrawi, Parisa

AU - Cronje, Jonathan Steven

AU - Zöllner, Christian

AU - Kubitz, Jens Christian

AU - Schulte-Uentrop, Leonie

N1 - © 2021 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of IJS Publishing Group Ltd.

PY - 2021/5

Y1 - 2021/5

N2 - Introduction: Many changes of medical curricula have been conducted in the past years. Based on learning psychology, three dimensions of learning have to be covered, in order to create the best possible curricula: Cognitive, metacognitive and motivational. The metacognitive and cognitive dimension (what/how to teach) have always been considered and the motivational dimension has been neglected, although the importance and benefits of motivation in learning have been emphasized repeatedly. One way to influence motivation in medical curricula are the teaching formats, as it has been shown that the construction of a curriculum can influence students' motivation. So far, evidence about the motivational effects of teaching formats are scarce.Methods: In a prospective interventional cohort study, 145 3rd year medical students were sampled. The effects of a 3-day bedside teaching in the operating theatre and two simulation-based trainings on students' motivation (outcome measure) were analysed. It was hypothesized, that the simulation training and the bedside teaching enhance autonomous motivation and decrease controlled motivation.Results: The bedside-teaching decreased external (controlled) motivation (-0.14, p = .013, 95% CI [-0.24, -0.03]), alongside with identified (autonomous) motivation (-0.22, p < .001, 95% CI [-0.34, -0.10]). The simulation-based trainings did not change students' motivation.Conclusion: To prevent the unintended decrease of identified (autonomous) motivation, undergraduates should be supervised and introduced carefully, when attending bedside teaching in unknown medical fields. Simulation-based medical education certainly has plenty of benefits in medical education but its effects on the motivational dimension of learning needs further investigations.

AB - Introduction: Many changes of medical curricula have been conducted in the past years. Based on learning psychology, three dimensions of learning have to be covered, in order to create the best possible curricula: Cognitive, metacognitive and motivational. The metacognitive and cognitive dimension (what/how to teach) have always been considered and the motivational dimension has been neglected, although the importance and benefits of motivation in learning have been emphasized repeatedly. One way to influence motivation in medical curricula are the teaching formats, as it has been shown that the construction of a curriculum can influence students' motivation. So far, evidence about the motivational effects of teaching formats are scarce.Methods: In a prospective interventional cohort study, 145 3rd year medical students were sampled. The effects of a 3-day bedside teaching in the operating theatre and two simulation-based trainings on students' motivation (outcome measure) were analysed. It was hypothesized, that the simulation training and the bedside teaching enhance autonomous motivation and decrease controlled motivation.Results: The bedside-teaching decreased external (controlled) motivation (-0.14, p = .013, 95% CI [-0.24, -0.03]), alongside with identified (autonomous) motivation (-0.22, p < .001, 95% CI [-0.34, -0.10]). The simulation-based trainings did not change students' motivation.Conclusion: To prevent the unintended decrease of identified (autonomous) motivation, undergraduates should be supervised and introduced carefully, when attending bedside teaching in unknown medical fields. Simulation-based medical education certainly has plenty of benefits in medical education but its effects on the motivational dimension of learning needs further investigations.

U2 - 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102366

DO - 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102366

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 34007448

VL - 65

JO - ANN MED SURG

JF - ANN MED SURG

SN - 2049-0801

M1 - 102366

ER -