Treatment patterns in inpatient depression care

Standard

Treatment patterns in inpatient depression care. / von Wolff, Alessa; Meister, Ramona; Härter, Martin; Kriston, Levente.

In: INT J METH PSYCH RES, Vol. 25, No. 1, 03.2016, p. 55-67.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{182e8cb21e984f7faa94dbdddb44e428,
title = "Treatment patterns in inpatient depression care",
abstract = "This study aimed to identify latent patterns of treatment combinations in inpatient depression care. A secondary analysis of routinely collected data on inpatient depression treatment from 2133 patients was conducted. Exploratory latent class modeling was used to identify distinct classes of treatment combinations based on antidepressant medication, psychotherapeutic interventions, and additional treatments. The classes were compared with regard to patient characteristics and treatment outcomes. Eight different classes of inpatient treatment combinations could be identified: 22.8% of the patients were treated with a combination labelled {"}standard modern antidepressants{"}, 14.6% with {"}standard tricyclic antidepressants{"}, 12.2% with {"}high intensity innovative strategies{"}, 12.1% with {"}standard selective-reuptake-inhibitors{"}, and 11.6% with {"}low intensity{"}, 9.6% with {"}somatic{"}, 8.8% with {"}high intensity traditional{"}, and 8.3% with {"}high intensity psychosocial{"} care, respectively. Patients treated with different patterns of interventions differed statistically significantly regarding demographic and clinical characteristics. Responder rates ranged from 68.4% to 86.6% across treatment classes. The presented attempt of empirical modeling of a complex multifactorial intervention by means of latent class analysis proved to be a promising way of capturing the complexity of routine inpatient depression treatment. The identified classes of treatment combinations may provide relevant information for a re-evaluation and improvement of inpatient depression treatment strategies. Copyright {\textcopyright} 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.",
author = "{von Wolff}, Alessa and Ramona Meister and Martin H{\"a}rter and Levente Kriston",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.",
year = "2016",
month = mar,
doi = "10.1002/mpr.1487",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "55--67",
journal = "INT J METH PSYCH RES",
issn = "1049-8931",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Treatment patterns in inpatient depression care

AU - von Wolff, Alessa

AU - Meister, Ramona

AU - Härter, Martin

AU - Kriston, Levente

N1 - Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

PY - 2016/3

Y1 - 2016/3

N2 - This study aimed to identify latent patterns of treatment combinations in inpatient depression care. A secondary analysis of routinely collected data on inpatient depression treatment from 2133 patients was conducted. Exploratory latent class modeling was used to identify distinct classes of treatment combinations based on antidepressant medication, psychotherapeutic interventions, and additional treatments. The classes were compared with regard to patient characteristics and treatment outcomes. Eight different classes of inpatient treatment combinations could be identified: 22.8% of the patients were treated with a combination labelled "standard modern antidepressants", 14.6% with "standard tricyclic antidepressants", 12.2% with "high intensity innovative strategies", 12.1% with "standard selective-reuptake-inhibitors", and 11.6% with "low intensity", 9.6% with "somatic", 8.8% with "high intensity traditional", and 8.3% with "high intensity psychosocial" care, respectively. Patients treated with different patterns of interventions differed statistically significantly regarding demographic and clinical characteristics. Responder rates ranged from 68.4% to 86.6% across treatment classes. The presented attempt of empirical modeling of a complex multifactorial intervention by means of latent class analysis proved to be a promising way of capturing the complexity of routine inpatient depression treatment. The identified classes of treatment combinations may provide relevant information for a re-evaluation and improvement of inpatient depression treatment strategies. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

AB - This study aimed to identify latent patterns of treatment combinations in inpatient depression care. A secondary analysis of routinely collected data on inpatient depression treatment from 2133 patients was conducted. Exploratory latent class modeling was used to identify distinct classes of treatment combinations based on antidepressant medication, psychotherapeutic interventions, and additional treatments. The classes were compared with regard to patient characteristics and treatment outcomes. Eight different classes of inpatient treatment combinations could be identified: 22.8% of the patients were treated with a combination labelled "standard modern antidepressants", 14.6% with "standard tricyclic antidepressants", 12.2% with "high intensity innovative strategies", 12.1% with "standard selective-reuptake-inhibitors", and 11.6% with "low intensity", 9.6% with "somatic", 8.8% with "high intensity traditional", and 8.3% with "high intensity psychosocial" care, respectively. Patients treated with different patterns of interventions differed statistically significantly regarding demographic and clinical characteristics. Responder rates ranged from 68.4% to 86.6% across treatment classes. The presented attempt of empirical modeling of a complex multifactorial intervention by means of latent class analysis proved to be a promising way of capturing the complexity of routine inpatient depression treatment. The identified classes of treatment combinations may provide relevant information for a re-evaluation and improvement of inpatient depression treatment strategies. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

U2 - 10.1002/mpr.1487

DO - 10.1002/mpr.1487

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 26283617

VL - 25

SP - 55

EP - 67

JO - INT J METH PSYCH RES

JF - INT J METH PSYCH RES

SN - 1049-8931

IS - 1

ER -