Treatment during cerebral vasospasm phase-complication association and outcome in aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage

  • Isabel C Hostettler (Shared first author)
  • Kornelia Kreiser (Shared first author)
  • Nicole Lange
  • Nina Schwendinger
  • Dominik Trost
  • Samira Frangoulis
  • Theresa Hirle
  • Jens Gempt
  • Maria Wostrack (Shared last author)
  • Bernhard Meyer (Shared last author)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Aneurysm treatment during cerebral vasospasm (CVS) phase is frequently considered as particularly dangerous, mainly because of the risk of cerebral infarct.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the risk of aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (aSAH)-specific complications and functional outcome in patients treated during CVS phase.

METHODS: We retrospectively analysed a large, retro- and prospectively collected database of aSAH patients admitted to our department between March 2006 and March 2020. We conducted a uni- and multivariable logistic regression analysis to evaluate influencing factors on rebleeding, cerebral infarct, Glasgow Outcome Score (GOS) at discharge and mortality and assessed the rate of angiographic vasospasm on admission.

RESULTS: We included 853 patients. The majority of patients were female (66.6%), mean age was 57.3 years. Out of 853 included patients, 92 (10.8%) were treated during CVS phase, 312 (36.6%) underwent clipping and 541 (63.4%) endovascular treatment. Treatment during CVS phase was significantly associated with cerebral infarct in the multivariable logistic regression analysis, unrelated to the nature of intervention (OR 2.42, 1.29-4.54 95% CI p-value = 0.006). However, patients treated during CVS phase did not have increased risk of unfavourable outcome by GOS on discharge. In addition, they did not have a higher rate of rebleeding or mortality.

CONCLUSIONS: Treatment during CVS phase was significantly associated with a higher rate of cerebral infarct as confirmed by imaging. This did not reflect on GOS on discharge, rebleeding, or mortality. Aneurysm treatment during CVS phase is relatively safe and should not be postponed due to the risk of rebleeding and subsequent devastating deterioration.

Bibliographical data

Original languageEnglish
ISSN0340-5354
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 10.2022
Externally publishedYes

Comment Deanary

© 2022. The Author(s).

PubMed 35729347