Transabdominal Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Enterography in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Results of an Observational Retrospective Single-Center Study

TY - JOUR

T1 - Transabdominal Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Enterography in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Results of an Observational Retrospective Single-Center Study

AU - Calavrezos, Lenika

AU - Bannas, Peter

AU - Warncke, Malte

AU - Wiegard, Christiane

AU - Huber, Samuel

AU - Manthey, Carolin

N1 - The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

PY - 2022/1

Y1 - 2022/1

N2 - Purpose Transabdominal ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) are used to assess disease activity and extent in IBD, but their impact on therapeutic decisions is unclear. Therefore, our study has two goals: to compare the usefulness of US and MRE in assessing disease extent and activity in the small and large bowel, and to determine the relevance for clinical decisions in IBD. Materials and Methods We included 54 IBD patients who had undergone both MRE and US within three months. We used the construct reference standard model to compare MRE and US for detecting inflammation and examined the impact on clinical decisions in IBD patients. Results In 54 IBD patients (44 patients Crohn's disease (CD), 5 ulcerative colitis (UC), 5 indeterminate colitis (IC)), 42 patients (77.8%) showed inflammation either in the small or large bowel. Small bowel disease was present in 34 patients (77.3%). Complications were found in 19 patients (35.2%). MRE and US both showed high sensitivity (90.5 and 88.1%) and moderate specificity (50% in MRE and US) for detecting inflammation. MRE revealed higher sensitivity than US for detecting conglomerate tumors without statistical significance (85.7 vs. 71.4%, p=1.0) and equal specificity (97.9 vs 97.7, p=1.0). Therapeutic decisions included steroids in 20 patients (47.6%) and surgery/percutaneous drainage in six patients (14.3%), these decisions were triggered by results of US or MRE in equal distribution. Conclusion US and MRE have comparable sensitivity and specificity for detecting intestinal inflammation and complications in IBD patients. Therefore, both methods are sufficient for making clinical decisions.

AB - Purpose Transabdominal ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) are used to assess disease activity and extent in IBD, but their impact on therapeutic decisions is unclear. Therefore, our study has two goals: to compare the usefulness of US and MRE in assessing disease extent and activity in the small and large bowel, and to determine the relevance for clinical decisions in IBD. Materials and Methods We included 54 IBD patients who had undergone both MRE and US within three months. We used the construct reference standard model to compare MRE and US for detecting inflammation and examined the impact on clinical decisions in IBD patients. Results In 54 IBD patients (44 patients Crohn's disease (CD), 5 ulcerative colitis (UC), 5 indeterminate colitis (IC)), 42 patients (77.8%) showed inflammation either in the small or large bowel. Small bowel disease was present in 34 patients (77.3%). Complications were found in 19 patients (35.2%). MRE and US both showed high sensitivity (90.5 and 88.1%) and moderate specificity (50% in MRE and US) for detecting inflammation. MRE revealed higher sensitivity than US for detecting conglomerate tumors without statistical significance (85.7 vs. 71.4%, p=1.0) and equal specificity (97.9 vs 97.7, p=1.0). Therapeutic decisions included steroids in 20 patients (47.6%) and surgery/percutaneous drainage in six patients (14.3%), these decisions were triggered by results of US or MRE in equal distribution. Conclusion US and MRE have comparable sensitivity and specificity for detecting intestinal inflammation and complications in IBD patients. Therefore, both methods are sufficient for making clinical decisions.

U2 - 10.1055/a-1781-4410

DO - 10.1055/a-1781-4410

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 36172490

VL - 8

SP - E22-E28

JO - ULTRASOUND INT OPEN

JF - ULTRASOUND INT OPEN

SN - 2509-596X

IS - 1

ER -