Trabecular bone microarchitecture predicts fragility fractures in postmenopausal women on denosumab treatment

Abstract

BACKGROUND: High-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) represents a three-dimensional tool for the screening of osteoporosis patients i.e., regarding fracture risk. The purpose of this study was to determine the baseline and follow-up bone microarchitecture in relation to incident fracture risk in postmenopausal women on denosumab treatment.

METHODS: We have retrospectively evaluated data from 182 postmenopausal women treated with denosumab that underwent an initial HR-pQCT scan before the initiation of the treatment; and at least one second HR-pQCT after 12 months. Women were assigned to two groups based on documented fragility fractures for the following 2.9 ± 1.1 years: fracture (n = 22) and no fracture (n = 160). Baseline parameters from DXA, HR-pQCT and bone turnover were compared between the two groups. Furthermore, ROC and multiple regression analyses of the baseline and follow-up data were performed to evaluate the predictive value regarding incident fractures.

RESULTS: At baseline, trabecular parameters were significantly reduced in the fracture group and showed the best predictive value for new fractures, while DXA results could not predict fractures. A multiple regression model identified BV/TV and age as the best baseline parameters for incident fracture risk. At 12 months, cortical and trabecular parameters increased in the non-fracture group, while no significant increase was noted in the fracture group. However, no significant differences regarding the changes of these parameters could be detected between the non-fracture and fracture cohort.

CONCLUSIONS: Trabecular bone microstructure at baseline is crucial for incident fracture risk in postmenopausal women on denosumab treatment, especially in comparison to DXA values. In this context, the microstructural follow-up results seemed to be of lesser importance regarding fracture risk. The results of this exploratory study should be validated in independent populations.

Bibliographical data

Original languageEnglish
ISSN8756-3282
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 09.2018
PubMed 29960080